Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What we have to ask ourselves here is: To what extent do we want our society to put a value on wealth?


I would rather a society where value is placed on merit instead. I don't see any reason to prefer otherwise, unless you are someone who has gained their wealth through means other than merit.


Therefore we should encourage those who advertise themselves on the basis of merit, and discourage those who advertise themselves on the basis of wealth.


One way would be to sabotage attempts at display of wealth. If rich people found that parking their expensive cars on the street lead to them being damaged, they would be less likely to purchase such vehicles. They could sponsor worthy causes instead, for example.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By displaying their wealth in such an ostentatious

> way they are showing a disregard for the feelings

> of those less fortunate than them.

>

> Ok, I'm feeding the troll here, but it's

> Friday...

>

> Do you mean like using drinking water for flushing

> your toilet, whilst a lot of the world goes

> thirsty?

>

> Or by throwing away a large percentage of

> perfectly good food whilst a lot of the world goes

> hungry?

>

> Relatively, this whole country is, in world terms,

> that ostentatious person you hate.


Of course, and I am all in favour of actions which try and reduce this inequality.


(Although your drinking water point is a bit of a misplaced one)

jrussel Wrote:


If rich people found that parking their

> expensive cars on the street lead to them being

> damaged, they would be less likely to purchase

> such vehicles.


Where else do to you expect them to park?


Honestly, you've spouted so much rubbish on here you're just not worth engaging with.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Posh people's car tend to be nicer to look at and

> reasonably new. I'd be happier to make this

> regressive and torch any of the myriad old, ugly,

> clapped out, polluting, dangerous bangers that

> London's streets are full of.


Ideally, we would rid our streets of all private cars. But that is another discussion.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jrussel Wrote:

>

> If rich people found that parking their

> > expensive cars on the street lead to them being

> > damaged, they would be less likely to purchase

> > such vehicles.

>

> Where else do to you expect them to park?

>


If they don't have the expensive cars in the first place, they won't have to park them anywhere.


Come on - it's not that difficult!

jrussel. I feel similarly about people flaunting their unearned advantages over me. Therefore I've started hitting pretty people with brick. I've since moved on to breaking the legs of tall people, cutting the tongues out of eloquent people and poking the eyes out of people who can see further than me. I know it's only a little step towards equality but I feel it helps.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you have a car no matter how much you paid for

> it you've got to park it somewhere and ummm...

> oooh let me think...ummm that'll be the street

> then. Jeez!


That's right. They can park their reasonably priced cars on the street, instead of vulgar and expensive ones. Just like everyone else does. I'm not sure what you're getting all worked up about.

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> That's right. They can park their reasonably

> priced cars on the street, instead of vulgar and

> expensive ones. Just like everyone else does. I'm

> not sure what you're getting all worked up about.


Damn right. I have no idea what everyone is getting worked up about either.


It's obvious that the vulgar and expensive cars should go in the garage.

Any other boringsville cars they own can be left on the street where they belong. Really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I hate the idea of someone with a genuine disability losing money, it's heart-breaking. I thought the whole idea of these cuts was to get kids with mental health issues, which we used to call 'the human condition', off benefits and into a job. Before anyone says anything, I'm not talking about people with severe autism.  If the tests are so astringent, Spartacus, how come healthy youngsters with anxiety are getting benefits? It's ludicrous.  This from The Times:  Then there is mental health. This is the fastest-growing category of claim; anxiety and depression is now the single biggest reason to claim PIPs, accounting for 16 per cent of spending. Including problems such as autism and ADHD, there are 1.4 million people claiming for “psychiatric disorders”, almost 40 per cent of the total.   NHS figures on Thursday found that 23 per cent of people of working age now have a mental disorder, up from 18 per cent a decade ago, rising to 26 per cent in 16 to 24 year-olds. Young people are most likely to claim benefits for mental health problems and there is growing concern about a generation who may do so for decades. The number of children on disability living allowance, the precursor to PIPs, will reach a million by the end of the decade, double pre-Covid levels. Most of these are for behavioural problems such as ADHD or learning disabilities  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...