Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What we have to ask ourselves here is: To what extent do we want our society to put a value on wealth?


I would rather a society where value is placed on merit instead. I don't see any reason to prefer otherwise, unless you are someone who has gained their wealth through means other than merit.


Therefore we should encourage those who advertise themselves on the basis of merit, and discourage those who advertise themselves on the basis of wealth.


One way would be to sabotage attempts at display of wealth. If rich people found that parking their expensive cars on the street lead to them being damaged, they would be less likely to purchase such vehicles. They could sponsor worthy causes instead, for example.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By displaying their wealth in such an ostentatious

> way they are showing a disregard for the feelings

> of those less fortunate than them.

>

> Ok, I'm feeding the troll here, but it's

> Friday...

>

> Do you mean like using drinking water for flushing

> your toilet, whilst a lot of the world goes

> thirsty?

>

> Or by throwing away a large percentage of

> perfectly good food whilst a lot of the world goes

> hungry?

>

> Relatively, this whole country is, in world terms,

> that ostentatious person you hate.


Of course, and I am all in favour of actions which try and reduce this inequality.


(Although your drinking water point is a bit of a misplaced one)

jrussel Wrote:


If rich people found that parking their

> expensive cars on the street lead to them being

> damaged, they would be less likely to purchase

> such vehicles.


Where else do to you expect them to park?


Honestly, you've spouted so much rubbish on here you're just not worth engaging with.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Posh people's car tend to be nicer to look at and

> reasonably new. I'd be happier to make this

> regressive and torch any of the myriad old, ugly,

> clapped out, polluting, dangerous bangers that

> London's streets are full of.


Ideally, we would rid our streets of all private cars. But that is another discussion.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jrussel Wrote:

>

> If rich people found that parking their

> > expensive cars on the street lead to them being

> > damaged, they would be less likely to purchase

> > such vehicles.

>

> Where else do to you expect them to park?

>


If they don't have the expensive cars in the first place, they won't have to park them anywhere.


Come on - it's not that difficult!

jrussel. I feel similarly about people flaunting their unearned advantages over me. Therefore I've started hitting pretty people with brick. I've since moved on to breaking the legs of tall people, cutting the tongues out of eloquent people and poking the eyes out of people who can see further than me. I know it's only a little step towards equality but I feel it helps.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you have a car no matter how much you paid for

> it you've got to park it somewhere and ummm...

> oooh let me think...ummm that'll be the street

> then. Jeez!


That's right. They can park their reasonably priced cars on the street, instead of vulgar and expensive ones. Just like everyone else does. I'm not sure what you're getting all worked up about.

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> That's right. They can park their reasonably

> priced cars on the street, instead of vulgar and

> expensive ones. Just like everyone else does. I'm

> not sure what you're getting all worked up about.


Damn right. I have no idea what everyone is getting worked up about either.


It's obvious that the vulgar and expensive cars should go in the garage.

Any other boringsville cars they own can be left on the street where they belong. Really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...