Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James Plymouth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To the negatives in the group i think you all need

> to grow up. Fighting screaming and vomiting,

> please, and every weekend? Adventure had their

> trial period of 2am finishing and it worked, you

> making it sound like a bad day in beirut. It's on

> the lane, out of the way and unless you live with

> 5 seconds on that place i doubt quite highly that

> this is going to cause any real bother. If people

> want a drink till 2, let them, and since when did

> Dulwich become so bloody high and mighty, i

> absolutely love this area and the occasional 2am

> finish is fine by me. Do we really have to worry

> about this? If it's vomit you are worried about

> give me a call and i'll come and clean it up

> myself.


Ah well if the occasional 2am finish is fine by you then everybody else best shut up and do what you say!!


Jesus, what's the view like from having your head up your own arse?!?!?

Heh, I think everyone's got a bit heated on this so I'll try and bring it back a bit. I live a lot more than 5 seconds from the Adventure Bar, and it's not every weekend, but it's often enough that the designated driver has left his/her car near my house and the drunken passengers vocalise their walk back down our side street. It wouldn't be so bad if there was ambient noise but it's dead quiet here otherwise so their voices cut through the night waking us up. And sometimes they puke up on the way, or have a laugh smacking all the wing mirrors on their way back to the car.

If it's a weekend we grumble and go back to sleep - yes we were young once - but the days after Thursday and Sunday will be school nights come September and it's not fair on the kids. Maybe you've not noticed but there's a lot of them round here.

James Plymouth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By all means, because clearly you and all the

> other pathetic people ALL live on the lane and are

> all going to lose sleep over this, lets ask the

> police and see whether they have had to be called

> to all these supposed 'disruptions'. Yes you are

> right about people having their opinions, it's

> great we can all find somewhere to talk about all

> the really important things that are going to

> decimate our everyday lives, i suppose you lot all

> contribute to charity too. Is this the only thing

> disrupting your lives? I hope they leave a

> traffic cone shoved with dog mess in your prized

> magnolias.


This could have, of course, a positive effect!

  • 3 weeks later...

That will be welcome news for those residents that opposed and it is interesting to note that anti-social behaviour and under aged drinking were cited as reasons in part for refusal.


Southwark Licensing do take complaints and breaches seriously so use them if ever you have issues with a licensed premise.

"... Having heard from the applicant and Mr Blissett, the LSC was satisfied that the applicant had taken satisfactory steps to address the licensing objective of the prevention of nuisance by reason of the escape of music from the premises. Having considered the written representations of local residents and having heard from those residents present, the LSC was not satisfied that the applicant had adequately addressed the licensing objective of the prevention of nuisance in so far as it related to anti-social behaviour as aggravated by the excessive consumption of alcohol.


"The LSC noted that two sixteen year old girls had recently been admitted to the premises and had been served alcoholic cocktails. The LSC was not satisfied that the bar staff and door staff were taking adequate steps to refuse entry and service to those under the influence of alcohol. The LSC noted that the premises had no outdoor space and that many complaints related to the consequences of drunken behaviour outside the premises and in nearby streets, in particular, fighting, shouting, slamming of card doors, public urination and vomiting. The LSC noted that Mr Jackson (the DPS) visited the premises once or twice a week and appeared to be unaware of these problems which residents stated had been exacerbated since the licence was varied on 20 April 2009. The LSC noted that resident A20 (page 62 of the agenda) complained of nuisance on three occasions when a Temporary Event Notice (TEN) had been granted in July 2010.


"Accordingly the LSC considered it was both necessary and proportionate, having regard to the licensing objective of the prevention of nuisance to refuse the application in so far is it related to the extension of hours for licensable activities..."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Since you’re clearly not experiencing what we are I’m not sure I agree with any of your points. I also asked for anyone else having a similar problem… it’s absolutely fine if you’re not but I’d appreciate less of the “go live your life”. There is no need to comment with that tone, it doesn’t provide us with any help for the matter. Nor is it polite. We’re a very kind family simply not wanting damage and don’t find the actions necessary. It’s been the same driver/delivery for a while and this never used to happen. I wouldn’t post this on the forum if it wasn’t getting so frustrating. Again, the kids and myself have kindly asked for this to stop a few times with no success. We all work hard for our living and would never want (nor are we trying) to rid someone of their livelihood. But similarly, I don’t find it fair. Please feel free to PM me if anyone has any advise or shares the same.  
    • And now we have the worst labour government in many many decades who by moving to your position on the right are ushering in a far right reform government. Well done you.
    • You implied he did a good job in your first paragraph when you said you would have hated to see Corbyn lead the country through Covid - the alternative being Johnson, presumably? With the results we all saw. Unite - you have a problem with unions? Who work hard to see that their members get a fair deal in their workplace? How exactly are these people and groups "all as bad as each other"? In what way? Labour "purging their party of the far-left" has given us a weak prime minister who has apparently deserted any "left" (aka caring for other people and having decent moral principles) leanings he ever had. Which is why people appear to be leaving Labour in droves and voting, or intending to vote, Green or Lib Dem or for an independent Left candidate. Starmer has shot himself in the foot, in my opinion. But what would I know. What worked?! I don't know enough about what you are talking about to comment, but "believing" you know the reason someone did something does not make it true. I don't believe that Corbyn ever got "starstruck" or "forgot about his politics", but if you can provide evidence that those things are true, then fair enough. I don't think you can, though.
    • I think you need to get a grip If it's who I am thinking of, she's a young black girl in her twenties, has braids with bright colours through them and - I suspect - works with her father. It's always the same man behind the wheel and he's older than her, always in the same van, so I'm assuming it's a father-daughter combo which, if it is, I think is rather sweet.  They hustle hard in a job that is poorly paid, has little prospects, is relentless and thankless. The fact that they have stuck it out since the pandemic says a lot about them.  I think she's a lovely girl, who's perhaps a little shy - but she'll smile or chat back if you make the effort with her. And I admire her for sticking with that job for so long. Perhaps she's just one of these people who's naturally a bit clumsy or bashes things, the same way some people are heavy on their feet when they walk. But I wouldn't dream of jeopardising her job because she closes the slams the gate and doesn't 'kiss' the ring doorbell with her fingers.  Perhaps she's being passive aggressive because you are. And perhaps she also wishes she got to spend her time worrying about potential damage to her letterbox or her gate.  As for your gate / letterbox - you're talking about hypotheticals. Has there been any damage? No. Then go and live your life and worry about it when it happens.  (apols we have the wrong person, but some of my points still stand). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...