Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I did wonder that about the pile of fly-tipped rubbish next to the Peckham Rye guys - it looked like a tipper truck had just up-ended and dumped all that stuff, and all the travellers only had Transit-like vans, some with extra seats and child seats in the back. I know fly-tippers are scum, I wonder if they saw the traveller caravans and thought "great, we don't have to go to all the bother of driving to some scenic country lane, we can just leave this load here and everyone will blame the travellers."


I feel a bit guilty that I didn't have the balls to ask "so did you dump all that rubbish there?"


The site on Peckham Rye is now completely clear - I have to say, Southwark Council's guys did an amazing job of cleaning it all up very very quickly.

Pierre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I did wonder that about the pile of fly-tipped

> rubbish next to the Peckham Rye guys - it looked

> like a tipper truck had just up-ended and dumped

> all that stuff, and all the travellers only had

> Transit-like vans, some with extra seats and child

> seats in the back. I know fly-tippers are scum, I

> wonder if they saw the traveller caravans and

> thought "great, we don't have to go to all the

> bother of driving to some scenic country lane, we

> can just leave this load here and everyone will

> blame the travellers."

>

> I feel a bit guilty that I didn't have the balls

> to ask "so did you dump all that rubbish there?"

>

> The site on Peckham Rye is now completely clear -

> I have to say, Southwark Council's guys did an

> amazing job of cleaning it all up very very

> quickly.



If they knew they would be blamed for this pile of rubbish why did they not go and put a stop to who was dumping it?

You are kidding, aren't you?


Firstly, no-one has said they would know they could be blamed. Secondly, no-one has said that has definitely happened here. Thirdly, if it's so easy to put a stop to fly-tipping, why don't you do it?

Imagine your neighbour doesn't like you, you see a gang of people with baseball bats vandalising his car - are you going to go out and risk your safety just to make sure nobody blames you? Amazing, we've gone from travellers being blamed for being criminals to now being blamed for not being policemen!

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Imagine your neighbour doesn't like you, you see a

> gang of people with baseball bats vandalising his

> car - are you going to go out and risk your safety

> just to make sure nobody blames you? Amazing,

> we've gone from travellers being blamed for being

> criminals to now being blamed for not being

> policemen!


That's a really bizarre way of interpreting it.


Imagine if you were only ever planning to be temporarily parked up in one place, but you thought that place was OK so you'd like to stay a while, if they could put up with you.


Imagine if you had to live in a perpetually nervous state of always having to be ready to pack up your generator, hitch up your caravan - your home - and get back on the road to somewhere else. Maybe somewhere you'd only heard about through a phone conversation with a trusted friend that you're not literate enough to have written down in a useful way.


Imagine if a large group of teenage girls show up at your latest stop, screaming and throwing conkers and food, or a couple of grinning, menacing guys in a tipper truck arrive at your pitch and dump a load of rubble next to you because they know you can't fight them off on your own and you haven't a leg to stand on because the locals will blame you, while they can pick up more rubbish (and take money for it) and dump it half way up Layhams on Tuesday morning and you'll still get the blame?


Imagine how transient you'd feel, wherever you stopped to park up, and how resistant you'd have to become to the taunts and the shouts and the prejudice of those who were all too keen to make you feel you're not Part Of Their Community. And imagine how little you'd then care about dropping some litter, or driving across some grass, or leaving a mess, that's not all your own making, in a place that you thought might be good for a short while but has very swiftly taken on all the prejudices and hatred you and your children are so used to facing...?


--


Sorry, slightly inebriated rant but it's very easy to try and paint this in terms of black and white, but the fear and protectiveness I saw in the travellers of that group that I spoke to when they were attacked made me remember that they're people, human, parents, not the evil predatory monsters that we're so keen to believe in. And maybe the fly-tipped pallets and building waste wasn't their fault. But may have hastened their departure.

Pierre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Imagine your neighbour doesn't like you, you see

> a

> > gang of people with baseball bats vandalising

> his

> > car - are you going to go out and risk your

> safety

> > just to make sure nobody blames you? Amazing,

> > we've gone from travellers being blamed for

> being

> > criminals to now being blamed for not being

> > policemen!

>

> That's a really bizarre way of interpreting it.

>

> Imagine if you were only ever planning to be

> temporarily parked up in one place, but you

> thought that place was OK so you'd like to stay a

> while, if they could put up with you.

>

> Imagine if you had to live in a perpetually

> nervous state of always having to be ready to pack

> up your generator, hitch up your caravan - your

> home - and get back on the road to somewhere else.

> Maybe somewhere you'd only heard about through a

> phone conversation with a trusted friend that

> you're not literate enough to have written down in

> a useful way.

>

> Imagine if a large group of teenage girls show up

> at your latest stop, screaming and throwing

> conkers and food, or a couple of grinning,

> menacing guys in a tipper truck arrive at your

> pitch and dump a load of rubble next to you

> because they know you can't fight them off on your

> own and you haven't a leg to stand on because the

> locals will blame you, while they can pick up more

> rubbish (and take money for it) and dump it half

> way up Layhams on Tuesday morning and you'll still

> get the blame?

>

> Imagine how transient you'd feel, wherever you

> stopped to park up, and how resistant you'd have

> to become to the taunts and the shouts and the

> prejudice of those who were all too keen to make

> you feel you're not Part Of Their Community. And

> imagine how little you'd then care about dropping

> some litter, or driving across some grass, or

> leaving a mess, that's not all your own making, in

> a place that you thought might be good for a short

> while but has very swiftly taken on all the

> prejudices and hatred you and your children are so

> used to facing...?

>

> --

>

> Sorry, slightly inebriated rant but it's very easy

> to try and paint this in terms of black and white,

> but the fear and protectiveness I saw in the

> travellers of that group that I spoke to when they

> were attacked made me remember that they're

> people, human, parents, not the evil predatory

> monsters that we're so keen to believe in. And

> maybe the fly-tipped pallets and building waste

> wasn't their fault. But may have hastened their

> departure.



Another good post.


I hope some of the people on here who have been so quick to lay blame read it and feel even a tiny bit ashamed.

Every week I (my family) generate about a bin and a half (or more) of rubbish (of one sort or another) - often made up of 'unnecessary' packaging. I am lucky; as someone of fixed abode, Veolia comes round each week to collect and dispose of the rubbish for me - as a community charge payer I also get free access to waste collection sites to dispose of other rubbish, or can pay for Southwark to collect bulky items. Travellers are excluded from these services (which I acknowledge they don't pay for anyway) - but they will still, in normal life, be generating rubbish at least at the rate I do. I do not excuse their fly-tipping - but it should be acknowledged that their options are limited. Better rubbish collection services can be organised on permanent traveller sites, but these are few and far between.


Whilst we marginalise travellers we cannot be surprised if they marginalise us - caring as much for our sensibilities as we clearly do for theirs.

Massive eviction taking place about 11AM as I rode past, from the empty land opposite Harris Academy on Bellenden Road. Maybe they'd done something wrong, or hadn't moved when first told, but it looked like massive overkill to the naked eye: four police riot vans, three squad cars, thirty odd officers and the same number of private security men, some of them with attack dogs (one of the buggers (dog) tried to leap at me as I rode past, which didn't say much for the level of control their handlers have).
  • 2 weeks later...

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Travellers are excluded from these services


> Better rubbish collection services can be organised on permanent

> traveller sites, but these are few and far between.


Regarding the 'official' sites, local authorities are required to provide sites. I believe Southwark operates 4, but that info might be a bit out of date so I'm happy to stand corrected if anyone knows better.


A problem with official sites is that they tend to be run by a particular family, and where that is the case then whether spaces are available to you can, in practice, be a function of gypsy politics. So the system is there, it's a question of making it work. There should be no need for pitching up on land you're not allowed to use.


Regarding waste collection: Brighton & Hove City Council's approach is interesting. When travellers appear, B&H waste services rock up with bins, I think they install temporary toilets too. They certainly make a proactive effort to anticipate rubbish. Meanwhile, the neighbouring Sussex councils have a totally different approach: co-ordinated multi-agency teams visit unauthorised traveller sites within 24 hours of pitching. Trading standards check who is licensed to do what, and keep tabs on any work being done locally. The police check vehicle insurance etc. Children's social care finds out who is looking after whose kids. Places are found in schools. Etc.


You can guess which side of the authority borders travellers in that area tend to pitch.


Sounds like Southwark have acted at least similarly to the southern county councils. To me, there's nothing wrong with saying "Here is where you can pitch", and as long as sufficient provision is made then enforcing the law to discourage unauthorised pitches.

Phlox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here is a picture, sorry it's wonky, don't know

> how to do screengrab. Cringe indeed.



Thanks. Oh dear.


BTW screengrab: If you are using a PC or laptop, there should be a key on your keyboard which says "print screen".


Press it when you've got the screen up in front of you you want to grab.


Then go into a new page/document in something like Word or Notepad (in landscape format probably) and just press control V which will paste the screengrab onto the page, and then you can save it.


Don't know how to do it on a phone yet though, sorry.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...