Jump to content

Recommended Posts

OK this has been getting on my goat all day and I've finally found the time to make a thread about it.


Today has been a lovely day, and a scheduled check up at the GP this morning resulted in me leaving the car at home and walking to Crystal Palace Road. Roughly a 15 minute walk.


Along route I couldn't help but notice the dangerous number of bushes and hedges which are totally out of control. Not only do they scale dramatic heights, but many are simply growing out into the pavement restricting pedestrians from using the public footpath. On more than one occasion I was forced out into the road, and with cars being so closely parked to the road it is often a dangerous trip hazard. Fellow residents of East Dulwich, could you please trim back your bushes in time for the winter season as this is simply not acceptable. On average I would say every fourth house on CPR had an unruly bush.


Is there anyone I can contact about this? James Barber is this a council issue? I'm all for lovely hedges and beautiful front gardens, so don't take this thread the wrong way everyone. Just some simple maintenance and being mindful that disabled and elderly people struggle to negotiate these overgrown monstrosities.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/125854-trim-your-bushes-please/
Share on other sites

It could be that some of the houses in question are rented out and the landlords/landladies simply CBA. It could also be that they belong to people who are not physically able to do it, so a gentle offer of help could work here - if you know that is the case. Perhaps, though, even the most able-bodied house-owners are just too lazy to be bothered.


The council can and will cut the bushes back but they'll do it in a very utilitarian way and then charge you for it.


Some of the spots are dangerous because the foliage grows out to such an extent as to make people have to leave the pavement, not a great idea if you are pushing a buggy, walking a dog or are not as nimble on your feet as you were (or are in a wheelchair, etc).

We've had a warm, wet summer which has made for ideal growing conditions and more growth than usual. It's now the time of year when people think about cutting back excessive foliage in preparation for winter and I suspect cutting back overgrown shrubs and trees will already be on a 'to do' list for many without any prompting.


What's that saying about the none so righteous as the converted?!!


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1532452

How can the height of someone's hedge be of any relevance to a passer-by ?


Ah, but what about a nosy passer-by?


(and you are advised not to have hedges so high that a passer-by couldn't see someone trying to enter your property nefariously - but that's to your advantage not that of the passer-by)


Additionally some local authorities do have bye-laws about hedge or wall heights.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How can the height of someone's hedge be of any

> relevance to a passer-by ?


KK it isn't the height, it's the way some hedges take up virtually the whole width of the pavement.


If you are pushing a buggy, for example, you have to step into the road to get by.


It is at best annoying and inconvenient, and at worst dangerous.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice spot nxjen - vaguely remembered Louisa had

> posted on this before but hadn't realised she'd

> had such a major change in her opinion on the bush

> :)


diazie did it better, and wasn't even on a wind-up...:)

Well I'm afraid 'it' IS the height, the OP set the scene with "Not only do they scale dramatic heights..."


I know not any reason why a passer-by would have concern over a private hedge height.

I have a very tall one and, being a caring citizen, need to be aware of impacts it may have on a fellow member of the community - perhaps it causes 'excessive shadow' causing people to think they're in a ghetto at night when actually it's a sunny day ?

Having said that, I know the OP was a wind-up.

Hedges over 2 mtrs (6.5ft)

Creating light loss to neighbouring properties.


The law


The law giving local councils powers to deal with complaints about high hedges is contained in Part 8 of the Anti Social Behaviour Act 2003 ("the Act") and the High Hedges (Appeals) (England) Regulations 2005 ("the Appeal Regulations").


DulwichFox

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We've had a warm, wet summer which has made for

> ideal growing conditions and more growth than

> usual. It's now the time of year when people

> think about cutting back excessive foliage in

> preparation for winter and I suspect cutting back

> overgrown shrubs and trees will already be on a

> 'to do' list for many without any prompting.

>

> What's that saying about the none so righteous as

> the converted?!!

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?2

> 0,1532452


Indeed nxjen. My bush has since been kept in check regularly, however, being as I am, tucked away in a corner my front garden never has been overly grown to such an extent that it prevents people from gaining access to the footpath outside. Some of the hedges I was privy to yesterday were extreme in their overgrowth to say the very least.


Louisa.

Overgrown hedges are of a particular Hazard to Blind people who are likely to walk straight into them.


For anyone who doesn't know, there is a home for the blind/ partially sighted at the Forest Hill end of Underhill. Residents often walk locally, particularly (obviously) up Underhill.

The OP was not a wind up. Being poked in the eye by some bushes in the dark is no fun

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whilst we are on the subject of space- it would be

> very considerate of those who have hedges to trim

> them back to their property border because I am

> sick of not being able to walk down some streets

> with my partner without nipping into the road

> every 100 yards. The guilty parties probably never

> walk anywhere so they do not realise they are

> 'stealing' one third of the walkway.

> You have been warned- I am going to log your

> addresses and inform the council- or- if your

> hedge overhangs the public highway I may even be

> able to legally remove your overhang as long as I

> throw it into your front garden.


And that was in May 2013...it is a problem around here and if there is dog mess as well...I thought that because of the 2012 olympics we were all supposed to be trying to keep active...my son is 6'3" and there are loads of bushes he has to duck under. BTW- didn't have time to do the above but my annoyance has been rekindled...

My neighbor's one was pretty wild back at the start of summer, so I just got the hedge trimmer and took it back about 1 meter so it was level with the wall and our hedge (after making sure no birds was nesting in it). Didn't do the top or owt cos that's not my business and I don't care what it looks like. They did the top within days haha!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...