Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In theory, if a healthy bull/cow is cloned there is nothing to worry about. All that's happened is the original beast has been copied. It's a bit like taking a cutting from a plant.


In practice though (and this may be something to do with cloning techniques), many cloned animals are disfigured and suffer deformities/abnormalities (not unlike dogs bred for Crufts). For this reason the RSPCA has objections (to animal welfare not the quality of meat/milk) and the EU has banned cloned meat (and other foodstuffs) for human consumption.

Health wise I wouldn't worry a jot


What I would worry about is, similar to GM food generally, are we giving up the ability to grow our own food, independent of food cos. Contamination means you won't be able to grow, say, your own spuds should the company which owns the right to the relevant copyright so choose.


Simar withlibestocm

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Health wise I wouldn't worry a jot

...


> Simar withlibestocm



Really Sean, really, really, really?


I wouldn't worry overly, but not a jot seems wanton, you drunken sot - what the hell is this simar withlibestocm?

Well I read the Daily Mail this morning over someone?s shoulder and I now have it on good authority that if you eat this European satanic beef you will die immediately and your children will be eaten by gypsies. Best course of action is to stay indoors and not to take any calls from foreigners.

Homeopathic gypsies, tramps and thieves*, they're coming for your children. Whom they will clone before eating, always cloning the clones until all flavour has been lost, cloning cloning cloning until there's nought but one cell of the original, but that's when they're most delicious.


* Cher in a cagoule and birkenstocks

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That line i had to type blind as the letters were

> not showing on screen. Tis true!


Actually, wait a minute, back up, back up. YOU SEE THAT IPHONE ARGUING MAN? (whom I'm terribly sorry but I have forgotten who it was, because I don't really care all that very much, but just enough to be annoying in victory), but do you see that? The letters weren't showing on the screen. They weren't showing. On the screen.


Ergo jury rules for the blackberry (and me!)

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Money is the root of all evil, and that is why we

> are now having cloned meat sneaked into the food

> chain. The lesson of mad cow decease. forgotten.

> We are also eating geneticlly modified,

> maize,corncobs.cheese,etc etc.



and if we eat genetically modified stuff? what happens to us? what are the health implications?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...