Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Smiler Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Love my Bee but isn't going to work for 2 kids -

> boo hoo!



Smiler makes a good point.


Knowing what I know now, if I had my time again I would go for a phil & teds, as I had to get one anyway after I had number 2! I would also have a maclaren for the car.

We just did an intensive John Lewis session :-) and found it really useful. They give good impartial advice and you get a lot of information about the different alternatives. We still haven't actually bought one - but we're leaning towards the bugaboo bee


We found that the crucial difference between brands came down to whether the baby could face you, weight and ease of folding - both elements that (I think) will make all the difference getting on and off public transport. We came to the conclusion that if you were mainly pushing it around town and occasionally loading it in and out of a car then paying the extra for the bugaboo wasn't necessarily worthwhile - but if you'll be doing a lot of getting on and off buses/ trains then the bugaboo might just be worth paying the exorbitant sum you have to pay for it!


Don't know if others with experience would agree?

Tommy's on Peckham Rye have a good range and they're lovely chaps so go along and give them all a feel....the buggies, not the chaps.


We ended up with a mamas and papas thing. It's comfy, easy to use and light which means i can go on the underground, but really doesn't cope with Irish country roads so our ill advised graco behemoth works wonders there.

I have a bugaboo which i bought second hand on ebay. Love it. I took it when I went travelling as I was on my own with my son (now 19 months) to Italy, India, etc. I love the fact I can face my child and talk to him. It handles well. Has good storage space. And everything else other people say.

Then I was persuaded that I should swap for a Maclaren because it's so practical and light in comparison. Bought one on ebay very cheap because had a prob with suncanopie (?10). Tried it once. Hated it. It fell backwards when my toddler got out of it smashing the shopping on the floor, I can't see my son as it is so low (carbon dioxide level) and facing out, and lots more wrong with it.

I guess it is a matter of preference but my preference def goes to the bugagboos. And not for the look.

I will add that I have a Bugaboo and really love it. Unfortunately it was broken twice by BA on long haul flights. Once the chassis broke and once the brake handle was broken off. I was still within the year warrantee and both times Bugaboo sent me a new chassis within two says and collected the old one. I have never had any other problems with the frame - I didnt purchase the travel bag and in hindsight doing so many trips maybe I should have. But as far as everyday use my son loves it. I do have a Maclaren for the car and he really doesnt enjoy the ride, wont sleep in it etc. In his Bugaboo he will sleep soundly and he is now 2.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...