Jump to content

A City for All Londoners - Sadiq Khan's vision for London - opportunity for feedback


Recommended Posts

A City for All Londoners



http://www.london.gov.uk/get-involved/have-your-say/all-consultations/city-all-londoners




Start date: 24 October 2016


End date: 11 December 2016



The Mayor, Sadiq Khan, has published a new vision for London: A City for All Londoners.


This document outlines the capital?s top challenges and opportunities across priority policy areas, as well as the changes that City Hall wants to deliver over the next four years.


We want people to tell us what they think about this document. So, over the next few weeks, we're inviting stakeholders, community and voluntary organisations, and Londoners to take part in workshops and discussions to shape City Hall policy.


There are three stages of consultation, outlined below. You can also tell us what you think throughout this process (from now until 11 December) by emailing [email protected].

.

Making sure ALL council tax is paid in would be a start....council tax arrears- then maybe councils might be able to afford to maintain services instead of blaming central government for shortfalls. All this posturing is a big waste of money- consultations ffs- the only beneficiaries are the consultants!

I know! That's dedicated work-avoidance for you!


In my defence I didn't start off counting until I got a few pages in and noticed I had seen Sadiq several times in different poses - Smiling Sadiq, Authoritative Sadiq, Concerned Sadiq, Happy Sadiq, Laughing Sadiq, In-charge Sadiq, etc.


I do think he missed an opportunity though - no Holding a Baby Sadiq pic.

Just the 3 involving a bus. Two of him stood in front of a bus brandishing a 2 journeys for the price of 1 leaflet and one of him on a bus brandishing an Oyster card.


You are correct about his Dad - as Sadiq explains in his Foreword to the brochure, his dad was indeed a bus driver in London.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I *think* his dad was a bus driver......


Yes, I think I vaguely recall a rumour along those lines. I guess he doesn't like to talk about his background much.

Given he mentions it the forward of the brochure, saying he doesn't like to talk about it seems a bit off the mark...


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nigello Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I *think* his dad was a bus driver......

>

> Yes, I think I vaguely recall a rumour along those

> lines. I guess he doesn't like to talk about his

> background much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...