Jump to content

Gay lib outside the charity shop (contains rudeness)


Recommended Posts

Ooooh - you are so right Bob - Russian Goggles seemed absolutely bewildering - can you imgaine trying to mug someone using that method? Imagine the evidence you'd have to give in court!


One day I think I am going to start a thread asking people to divulge how often they check this forum and where they do it. I think the stats could be shocking... no wonder UK productivity is down this year!

Seagulling is when you have a wank, collect the fluid in your hand and then run out into the playground to slap it into the face of some poor unfortunate fellow pupil while yelling "Seagull!!".


Not something I've ever done, but then I'm 36!



Charlie

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rudeness and eye-opening colourful colloquialisms.

> Though next time I wander past a playground I may

> keep my eyes shut...just to be safe!!


And your mouth. Better safe than sorry.

this thread has sparked a debate in my office about the subject of seagulling, which has found itself launched into a heated conversation about tea-bagging......(I'm in an office with 3 male I.T.technicians!)

perfect friday afternoon conversations.....:-S

Isn't it amazing how a thread mutates. I was just about to reply to BB's latest post when I realised it would start to make this a thread about films


Personally I like the way this happens - usually - but I can see how frustrating it is for some people


I would take the conversation to the Film Theatre thread - but amazingly there isn't one (is there?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's not fair to hold Corbyn's brother's views against him when he has never explicitly or implicitly endorsed them. And he has enough of his own terrible positions to criticise anyway.
    • Completely unacceptable. They need to fund a proper, permanent park warden presence or this sort of behaviour will get worse. Parks should be safe for all to enjoy and being assaulted and threatened by teenage gangs may put more vulnerable people off using the park altogether. If they are prepared to threaten to hurt an animal then where might it lead? Sorry Alice but we'll have to disagree on this one. This does not sound like kids just being silly; lobbing water bombs at each other is one thing, but targeting complete strangers out for a walk and minding their own business and trying to kick their dog is, in my view, no laughing matter. A group of 15 teenagers can be intimidating, not to everyone but for some it can be, especially if their behaviour is aggressive.  
    • Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
    • A quick Google says that it is not undersubscribed unlike many subject schools so those claims mentioned above may not be true. Last Ofsted was good.  You are definitely right about the money. This is what trusts do. Remove word ‘subject’ above Remove word ‘subject’ above I can’t edit my ridiculous errors but would like to apologise  for messy post
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...