Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I received a text appointment reminder for an NHS physio appointment. The text also laid out the costs of not attending to the NHS. I can of course understand this as a tool to prevent missed appointments by making people feel accountable. I would also expect from an ethical perspective that the amount quoted would be accurate.


The amount quoted was ?160, which surprised me greatly given I could easily find a private option for ?50-60. Are the costs really ~3x higher for the NHS? If so surely it is a no brainier for the NHS to outsource these treatments to a private sector provider and make an instant saving?


This probably misses some additional costs that would be incurred in administering and qualifying external providers, however given the bulk buying power the NHS would have discounted prices could surely be negotiated to at least offset this somewhat.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/
Share on other sites

Barts did a test on how to reduce missed appointments - and used ?160 as the figure


https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-missed-hospital-appointments-using-text-messages/a-zero-cost-way-to-reduce-missed-hospital-appointments


Maybe it isn't a real figure just nicked from the survey :)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077496
Share on other sites

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I got a reminder for something entirely different

> and that was ?160.00 too. Maybe they use that

> amount for everything.


I've had the same rate for two completely different things so I think it is just an average across all appointments - which I'm happy with. I wouldn't want someone spending the time to get an exact figure just to encourage me to turn up

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077498
Share on other sites

AM, PW,


If AM was quoted the same amount for a different treatment then it is probably an average for all missed appointments. In that case the text is at best poorly written and at worst deliberately misleading. I suppose you could argue that the end justifies the means even if it's the latter.


Miga,


The appointment was with a physio at an NHS hospital so not already outsourced. A comparable appointment at a private practice would be ?50-60 in central London at most places.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077501
Share on other sites

Hiya Loz, I always get a text the day before my appointments, from the hospital, the dentist and the quack (yep, I'm that high medical maintenance).


I'm ashumin' you got you one them portable style telephones, so jus' let 'em know yer digits an' they'll telegraph ya!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077814
Share on other sites

I think this figure is quite revealing. A home visit by a physio only costs ?50 (I book them for my father). So, if we take the figure on trust it suggests imputed costs are completely out of control. This corroborates the fact that real spending on the NHS (i.e. after inflation) has gone up every year for over a decade and yet services are 'at breaking point'. They know this which is why hospitals now tag disposable items with their cost to dissuade unnecessary use - but that is certainly not the problem.


Talking to a heart surgeon a while ago, he said he was doing half the operations he got through fifteen years ago. He is now completely encumbered by bureaucracy/paperwork. Administrators, managerialism have taken over.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1077947
Share on other sites

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hiya Loz, I always get a text the day before my

> appointments, from the hospital, the dentist and

> the quack (yep, I'm that high medical

> maintenance).

>

> I'm ashumin' you got you one them portable style

> telephones, so jus' let 'em know yer digits an'

> they'll telegraph ya!


The doc and the dentist are fine with new tech - it's the hospital specialists that seem to be refusing to be dragged into the 21st century.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1078281
Share on other sites

A driver from the company with the franchise for hospital transport told me (in 2012) they were charging the NHS ?300 for the 10 minute trip from KCH to Dulwich. This carried just my mother in a 10 seater transporter from and to Dulwich- ie ?600 for the round trip. The driver was told not to take one of her neighbours from the same road, as they would be charging that journey on a separate bill, thus leaving exhausted sick people hanging around the transport waiting room. We never used the transport service again. Also it would only have cost ?30 for a cab. This company has the franchise for several hospitals.


At another hospital they are installing 20 Dyson 50 watt led uplighters at ?1000 each to light up a ceiling that they have just painted black.


A tiny glimpse at NHS costs before healthcare begins.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1079185
Share on other sites

I think these useless people get jobs through mates. I am convinced of this after Tessa Jowell used her friend Anthony Gormless's horrible lumps of metal around this area. And sticking statues of men on the beach, and the Angel of the North....yuk....what is wrong with Nature in the natural state...

The stone outside UCLH

https://www.ft.com/content/8e10bb3c-a7d1-11e4-be63-00144feab7de

I had occasion to visit someone there on and off for 2 years for 3 or 4 weeks at a time after that was placed and I can say that ALL the patients I saw were outside the back entrance having a fag....wheeled drip stands alongside them (metal sculptures in themselves- and they are difficult to get in some hospitals)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133062-nhs-costs/#findComment-1079384
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Community payback already exists   https://www.gov.uk/community-sentences/community-payback
    • Thanks for that - none  of mine  have been Mordena - whilst vulnerable cat, think I will just take my chances… Will be having flu though - certainly not by choice - much prefer not to but in vulnerable group.. Avoided them until last year…. Luck of drawer if you are as sick as fog  or just sore arm … assume - god knows - that flu jab is same throughout country.       
    • Wow, that is what it costs for one prisoner. So they get full board and lodging, 24 hour  monitoring  in over populated prison, we are led to believe, minimum exercise, assume a tv in each cell provided - in USA it is together with wash hand basin and c toilet - some have showers as well.   Clearly this amount of money takes  into account overstretched and overworked prison officers, protection for them, counselling which is, in my opinion a bare minimum dealing with prisoners in all settings. Do if Sweden can look outside the box, why can’t we? Or are we just not bothered at all / read statistics some where that reoffending is normal and to be frank, with economy as it is at the moment re employment, cost of living and homelessness..not surprised they reoffend to get back inside - food provided, roof over your head - much better than street living, mixing with wrong crowd, trying to get roof over your head, find a job where 90 % won’t employ you as been inside..
    • @beansprout The Swedes seem to have a useful strategy with regard to offenders  which has reduced repeat offending.  I agree that prison time for minor offences is a complete waste of time. Even worse is that prisons are "colleges of crime" where inmates learn about how to be do crimes and worst of all, become exposed to drug taking. I wouldn't advocate having chain gangs as in the USA but some strategy for getting them into say manual work under supervision might be useful - especially if it came with a modest wag. This would be significantly cheaper than the £51,100 it costs per year for  keeping one in jail.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...