Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My son is due to start school next September but as he is a summer born child we are exploring the possibility of him delaying his entry into primary school until September 2018..


I wonder if anyone in the local area has experience of this or is considering it for their child next year? He will most likely go to Ivydale Primary School.

Hello

A friend of mine has a summer born son and he has started 4 days a week. I know others than have done half days for a set period of time. It maybe worth considering reduced hours as an option? Appreciate only you know whats best for your child. I myself have an August born very shy 4 year old and decided not to delay her start. I am so glad I didn't delay as she is really growing in confidence and loving it. I thought she would struggle with the social and emotional side but the school have been fantastic and she seems to be settling in better than I could have expected. She gets tired and finds the after school club a little overwhelming but all in all its been great.

You can definitely delay/defer (our younger is May born, but was due in mid-July and we are going to do it because while nursery/reception can be fine, the jump to Year 1 is apparently a huge change so we'd prefer her to be older). Try FB group "Flexible Admissions for Summer Borns" and local FB groups out of that main one - there is definitely one in Lewisham. You need to speak to the school head teacher, but if a state school then it's the LA's decision. Lewisham is very supportive, I imagine Southwark is too. You do need to make the application as usual for schools and also submit a delay application. Good luck!

It's not 100% the LA's decision. The head teacher also has a say in it, but ultimately needs to take a decision 'in the best interest of the child'. If you join the FB group that devsdev recommends, there is a 'pinned section' (or whatever it's called) at the start which has all the relevant sections of the school admissions code in it. Apparently Southwark is pretty good in allowing it, but again the HT needs to be on board too.


We're looking at delaying as well.

That doesn't immediately make sense Passiflora. There are guidelines in place that allow for this and many teachers (including my sister in law) are generally supportive of allowing summer babies to be held back when its in the best interest of the child.


I should add, I have a winter baby so I'm not defending anything I've done personally. My sister in law teaches reception though and she absolutely thinks for some children its the appropriate thing to do.

From what I have heard of Ivydale they are very supportive in these circumstances so I would def speak to the head about it. She is very experienced and I have found her very sympathetic when speaking to her over the years. (I should add that I am not affiliated with the school in any way other than that I live very close by, my son goes to reception at a different school).


Good Luck!

Either is possible. It all depends on what the school and parents think is most appropriate for the child. If your baby is born after April 1st and before August 31st there are a host of options available, including going part time, skipping reception and going straight into year one when they turn 5 (only if they are born in the summer) or starting reception at 5 (only if they are born in the summer).


Here is the statutory guidance.


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/389448/Summer_born_admissions_advice_Dec_2014.pdf

Ok so mine are well beyond reception but on reflection my concerns would be that if they were to join straight into year 1 then they would not be going back over the work they had missed out on and so they would be behind in that way. My eldest is summer born and has just done her mock GCSEs but way back when she started primary her school had a split start and automatically put her with the January starters. Nobody went back over the work she had missed out on during that first term. I was new to the whole system and wasn't aware of this. Looking back she can remember feeling behind the others and aware that she didn't know stuff they did. However her learning really kicked in during year 1 and her age soon made no difference. So I guess what I'm saying is if you are delaying their start and they are going to go into year 1 then make sure you are teaching them yourself so they are not behind unless they are going to be able to start in reception a year late and then it can be a more relaxed extra year before school.


I know all children develop at different rates and will take different things in at different rates but for a child to miss out on reception then they are missing out on lots of learning opportunities that they will take in at their own pace and also a gentle intro to the formality of school life.

Mrs TP - current guidance means a summerborn child can delay the whole year (and therefore start with a new cohort in reception rather than skipping reception altogether which is what the old rules used to mandate). But your point about missing a term in reception (since no child has to be full-time till January in any event) is well noted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 [email protected] Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...