Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Please explain more - Is this just a talking shop with no powers or purpose? Or are you organising this meeting on behalf of an authority or recognised organisation? It sounded a bit odd that you will send details of the venue and timings to those who PM you. Wouldn't it be better if you posted the details for all to see - or perhaps you are just trying to judge numbers?

Hi, No im not working for any authority im just wanting to discuss how everybody feels about Peckham being in the negative side of the papers. the meeting is ongoing and all the timings and the venue will be organised tommorow so i would let everybody know the dates and timings of the meeting.

Thanks

Uzzy

Yep as I said its many peoples opinion but the media has influenced on peoples opinions. As if someone gets shot in Peckham it reaches the headlines but in other places it doesn?t make such of a difference. That?s why I have made a meeting in spite of this inviting many people from the media reporters to local councillors. So Come along and get the answers.

Thanks

Uzzy

Honestly, what do you hope to achieve by staging this pointless gathering? Validating hysteria in the company of other needlessly frightened peers?


I tell you what, why don't you bring along some knitting to do afterwards whilst you all watch re-runs of Crimewatch. And you can round the evening off by getting Arthur and Stanley to do their impressions of those fackin' coloured kids from Peck'am.


Seriously, this meeting you propose will have absolutley no long-term benefit to the community.


Instead of focusing on all the negatives, and devoting your spare time to tabloid rumour mills, why not pre-occupy yourselves with all the positive aspects of Peckham. It's only 'bad' because you've allowed the gutter press to convince you that you live in an area that's comparable to Beirut. It's not


In other words, pay less attention to the media pointing at shadows that aren't there. You'll feel alot better for it.

Uzzy12, you say that you have invited media and local councillors. Have any agreed to come?

Also, just to clarify, are you suggesting that the media reports crime in Peckham at a disproportionate frequency to elsewhere in London/UK, or that somehow the same level of reporting has more effect on local opinion in this area due to some localised susceptibility to the press?


Oh, and what's the purpose? Are you intending to attempt to gag the press or are you after some sort of positive PR campaign for Peckham?

The Meeting that will be taking place is about how Peckham is not deprived as the media say there are many benefits the meeting will be like that emphasising on the goodness of Peckham and then the down falls. The Media and the councillors said they would get back to me next week to appoint someone but there will be people from the media coming.

Well Peckham in the papers has always been in the eye about all the bad things but its time to change gets Peckham in the papers for a good reason like this meeting. And yes we will be having a little campaign to the media for the positive in Peckham to go in. I hope this answered all the questions please come on join on Tuesday 19th October 2010 @t 2.00pm - 3.00pm At The Harris Academy @ Peckham

Thanks

Uzzy

Sorry Uzzy12, I'm having real trouble understanding your posts. I suspect that you are typing on a blackberry, or similar, and don't realise that one sentence is running straight into the next. Any chance of a bit of punctuation to make sense of that last one?

You say that the media are coming; it would be helpful to judge the worth of attending if you would let us know which media outlets are sending representatives. Will it be mainstream media or just local papers?


I think you are suggesting that the press gives an unfairly negative impression of Peckham. On a personal note I would say that this is not my impression. My experience of Peckham is that it has high levels of crime but, as long as you are conscious of that, then it's a vibrant place to live, work and shop. I'm not convinced that the mainstream media identifies Peckham as any different. If I lived in the North of the country I might have far more to complain about in terms of media generated image.


I'm surprised that you are having this meeting during the day when only the retired, home-makers and unemployed will be able to attend. If the media do send representatives that may not send the right message - it would be a real shame if they reported that the local populous was dominated by non-taxpayers. That is unlikely to benefit the media image.

peterstorm1985 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm surprised that you are having this meeting

> during the day when only the retired, home-makers

> and unemployed will be able to attend. If the

> media do send representatives that may not send

> the right message - it would be a real shame if

> they reported that the local populous was

> dominated by non-taxpayers. That is unlikely to

> benefit the media image.

--------------------------------------------------

+1, Was about to highlight this very point. Glad you mentioned it as

you put it far more eloquently than i ever could ;)


But seriously, how many people do you expect to turn up when you arrange

for such a ridiculous time!

To be fair to Uzzy, sometimes it does seem that Peckham is only known for Fools & Horses or Damilola Taylor according to the press; but those of us who live there know that's not the only story.


Do we really care what others think? It leaves Peckham for us who know better. I'm cool with that.

^another good point :)

I'm not sure many of us share Uzzy concern, i for one don't see all this negative press?


Bellenden has a fantastic vibe about it with some excellent pr going on.

The Windigameigery thing in the park last weekend, Antony Gormley, Franks - The pop up bar...


What has East Dulwich??

We had a shooting on Barry Road last year, rape earlier this year etc etc


Depends what you read and how you interpret things i guess....??

yepp sorry im typing on my blackberry. Depends what you read and how you interpret things i guess....?? yepp this is the point of the media influencing others opinion on our society, Well it depends who turns up really you would have your questions answered the time might get changed within the next day depending on how many people are to come. But the real point is making a change in our society a day for your views to be expressed. And with the media I would think they would focus more on the meeting then the other statements wriiten above.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...