Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Especially since the money to set these up is coming from state schools, there is no requirement on those establishing free schools o demonstrate there is a need for places, and in freezing school building programmes the govt has ceased to fund the expansion in school places that was required in many areas. Money is being diverted from where it was needed to meet a need due to a shortage, to establish free schools elsewhere... purely political.
The thing that screamed at me was how the guy leading a free school project just didn't listen to the boy who showed him around a comprehensive school. All we need is more dictators creating oppressed truanting children in our education system. Free schools should live upto their name by producing free thinkers.

"pet project" is a bit of disparaging description of possibly the most radical change to education in decades. Obviously everyone wants "decent state schools" but the government has decided this is best way of acheiving that. Surveys of results elsewhere are a bit inconclusive, but the most positive ones show that not only are the free schools better for pupils but they pull up the performance of other schools as well.


I missed the programme but presumably "Heston" was Toby Young. I'm not sure you can take his views as representative of how free schools will work in general.

njc97 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I missed the programme but presumably "Heston" was

> Toby Young. I'm not sure you can take his views as

> representative of how free schools will work in

> general.



No but it encapsulates how parents are not necessarily the best people to lead education reform if they adopt the 'we know what's best' approach. It's 100 years back to 'force feeding' (he used that term not me).

I objest very strongly about schools being established where there is no shortage of places, given the money is being diverted from existing schools, many of which need major investment in poor or indequate buildings, and may not have sufficient places.


For instance, in the LA where I work, there is a need for an extra 10 forms of entry for Year 7 within 8 years. Noe all building plans are frozen, and money is being diverted to free schools in other areas. If we were the families affected by this, we would be up in arms!!

I've yet to watch the program although I've read plenty of Toby Young's comments on this. The thing that struck me was that he explains his drive to open a school being that to live in London and pay for one child to be privately educated is do-able, but since be has 4 children it's not possible. Well, do you know what mate, just don't have so many children!! I'd love to have a huge brood but I can't afford it!


I'm with Fuschia re objecting to schools being opened (at cost to us) whilst there are spaces available in existing schools and fear it is consigning the kids in non achieving schools to the scrap heap for good. I don't know what the solution is (other than to ban private schools lol) but I'm not sure this is it..

Toby Young's father was Michael Young who helped create the Open University and Which Magazine. His mother was Sasha Moorsom

a writer who also founded Lauderdale House Arts Centre in Highgate. Can't imagine they'd be too chuffed with the whole free

school thing.....

Hi njc97,

I'm not aware of any research to show the Swedish 'free schools' modfel as producing anything other than average results.


Hi Fuschia,

I'm with you on this one for host of reasons. Fortunately free schools is yet to prove popular - it takes a lot to create a viable school.

The Tories in the colaition government wanted free schools. In exchange the Lib Dems get the Pupil Premium - where schools get extra money for every child from a disdvantaged background - based on Dutch idea. The first tranche of Pupil Premium arrives Sept 2011.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


In exchange the Lib Dems get the Pupil

> Premium - where schools get extra money for every

> child from a disdvantaged background - based on

> Dutch idea. The first tranche of Pupil Premium

> arrives Sept 2011.


Only schools in deprived areas like the one I work in, which already got enhanced funding through various mechanisms, will apparently lose out substantially as the same money gets spread across more LEAS/more schools. So the pupils in our area will actually get less. And although it was promised schools would be "protected" we are going to have to fork out to pay for many services that we used to receive for free or subsidised, as spending cuts decimate the LEA. I estimaate the effect of these two factors will be cuts upwards of 10% in my school.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "North Korea style propaganda rants, I remind myself that he thinks Kemi Badenoch is the solution" Kemi is much better than mad raving Starmer and his other two stooges Reeves whose wrecking ball tactics are causing the UK economy to go of the side of a cliff and oh what happened to Rayner, where is she exactly, as she's gone so quiet or has Starmer put her back on a short leash again.  I hate to disagree with you, no chage that you, I happily disagree with you, the three stooges Starmer, Reeves and Rayner, couldn't have made more of a balls up in the first three months even if they had where all blindfolded. 
    • It’s just the way things are prioritised how much was spent on revamping that waiting room to show exclusive art shows while  there are still no usable lifts to the platforms
    • Fully appreciate your concerns rollflick, but (as you say) it's good news that contracts have finally been awarded. Feels like people want to bemoan its failure before work has even started, which seems a tad negative.
    • The first 9 months hasn't been a total calamity - not if you compare it to what came before. People have lost all sense of proportionality if they think Labour are THAT bad But If 2015 went differently we would have avoided Corbyn Brexit 5 prime ministers in 6 years   seems like a fair trade
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...