Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ridgely you never used get people getting violent on the herb. They were too stoned.


People who are susceptible to mental illness shouldn't smoke cannabis. It makes their symptoms worse. I don't like skunk. Skunk is far too high in THC. I do not remember so many cases of mental illness through smoking cannabis/marijuana since the advent of hydroponic skunk. It just didn't happen.

Exactly Brendan. How much violence is caused by excessive drinking by pissed up idiots who can't handle their drink. Blockheads who just want to have fight when their drunk. Anybody working in casualty in a hospital will you that most of the people they get through their doors every weekend are taken up by binge drinking drunks.

Everything has its place.


I wouldn't sit around puffing it all day (er, not any more anyway) but if you're going to a festival and filling your boots with all the rest, nothing other then skunk will really touch the sides.


The problem with skunk is that it's so widely in demand (I blame 'the youth' - and indeed 'the meeja' for glorifying the stuff massively at every opportunity) that it's hard to find any decent alternatives amongst the duff resin and commercial weed full of twigs usually on offer.

I had a friend once, who took it to wind down. He wound down so far he couldnt work,he got the sack. He went on to pester all his friends for money to get his fix. It went on from there ,he chased the dragon, His marriage broke up after he beat his wife up. Moved in with his mother, beat her up got her in debt,and smashed her home up. He did die in Kings , overdose.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...