Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ridgely you never used get people getting violent on the herb. They were too stoned.


People who are susceptible to mental illness shouldn't smoke cannabis. It makes their symptoms worse. I don't like skunk. Skunk is far too high in THC. I do not remember so many cases of mental illness through smoking cannabis/marijuana since the advent of hydroponic skunk. It just didn't happen.

Exactly Brendan. How much violence is caused by excessive drinking by pissed up idiots who can't handle their drink. Blockheads who just want to have fight when their drunk. Anybody working in casualty in a hospital will you that most of the people they get through their doors every weekend are taken up by binge drinking drunks.

Everything has its place.


I wouldn't sit around puffing it all day (er, not any more anyway) but if you're going to a festival and filling your boots with all the rest, nothing other then skunk will really touch the sides.


The problem with skunk is that it's so widely in demand (I blame 'the youth' - and indeed 'the meeja' for glorifying the stuff massively at every opportunity) that it's hard to find any decent alternatives amongst the duff resin and commercial weed full of twigs usually on offer.

I had a friend once, who took it to wind down. He wound down so far he couldnt work,he got the sack. He went on to pester all his friends for money to get his fix. It went on from there ,he chased the dragon, His marriage broke up after he beat his wife up. Moved in with his mother, beat her up got her in debt,and smashed her home up. He did die in Kings , overdose.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...