Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sean depsite my typos and incomplete sentences (forums are a cruel exposition) I'll will soldier on...


What I was saying was that you seek to redistrubute wealth no other reason other than it is 'fair' (as nebuoluos a concept if ever there were one). It is far fairer that people were self -relaint and only those in need were assisted.



I don't think giving money to the deserving and not so deserving helps anyone else. Speaking from experience of those close to me, it breeds dependency and before you know it, it's too late.


Neither will you be less likely to be mugged. What you will get is those who work being less likely to work hard and seeing the point at which the lines of the benefit of working and not working cross ever lower. It is simply unproductive.


The equality issue should be about equal access to education because that is where social mobility arises.

whoah - I turn my back for 2 minutes and how many replies???


In order the (I think!)


Jeremy: my point exactly. Limited amount of top jobs so if we over-compensate those people ther is less for the majority. Plus there was a genreal feeling amongst the Slytherins (oh come on I mean it well ;-) ) that if only people pulled up their socks they too could be in the money, when mathematically they just can't


Alan - I presume you mean there IS a finite amount of money to share out? In any case I don't thin we need to reduce the obsecenly wealthy to penury and bread queues - such melodrama! To take a tiny example, in the recent budget the abolition of the 10p tax band was at the expense of the poorest and used to pep up those well off. It wasn't a huge burden on the middle-classes was it?


Dave R and Jeremy Pt 2 - I'm not against a market economy. I think I've said that a number of times. Instead of holding up a communist/soci-alist state I have already used Scandanavian market-economy models (and to a lesser extent the European model) as a "fairer" example of a genuine stakeholder society. Speaking of fairness


Downsouth - indeed the definition is up for debate. But everyone on here knows exaactly what I'm talking about. And to rebut (if I may) the crime wouldn't reduce, again I refer you to countries outside the US/UK model which manage to incorporate a free market into a fairer society (speaking of free markets and US protectionism... oh that can wait until later). Also re: your education point I can agree that it is the best starting point but once again - even if everyone did their utmost and there were no slackers, some will be better suited to the top jobs, the so-so jobs and the plain shockers - why condemn them to penury of they just aren't equipped?


There lingers a nasty condemnation of poor people as deserving of their fate and that ain't always so

Just a minor aside..


My old history prof lived in East Berlin (before the demise of the wall, obviously). He had some interesting things to say about what East Berliners (the people, not the hot dogs) thought about the society forced upon them. He honestly felt that (for all its faults) there was a sense of 'fairness' amongst the common people, that he hasn't felt anywhere else since.


He also missed the wall coming down cos he was in the pub and didn't believe it when someone came in to spread the news.

But by the time that happens I'd hazard some will have left this solar system to 'colonise' a new part of space. Infinity is what you make of it. I share your view that the earth's resources are finite but then in terms of layers we've only scratched 1-2% of the surface. The amount of heat and minerals etc... much deeperi in the crust and core will - barring armageddon, natural or otherwise - probably keep the human race going for a while yet.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Limited amount of top

> jobs so if we over-compensate those people ther is

> less for the majority.


But City traders aren't over compensated. As someone else pointed out (was it Mockney?), they are paid according to how much money they earn for the company. They're paid what they're worth... no more, no less. "Fat-cat" CEOs are a different matter, that's not what I'm discussing here.



> Plus there was a genreal

> feeling amongst the Slytherins (oh come on I mean

> it well ;-) ) that if only people pulled up their

> socks they too could be in the money, when

> mathematically they just can't


I never said that people were guaranteed a top job if they pulled their socks up. You have to be smarter and harder working than the competition - and it's not for everyone. But I don't have a problem with the top n% earning a lot of money.

The idea that you're paid "what you're worth" doesn't ring true to me. Are you telling me a city trader is 'worth' dozens of the rest of us? What does that mean? Is he more important (for it usually is a bloke - generally speaking a pompous, white, over-privileged, aggressive twat - for these are the characteristics that help you thrive in this line of work).

Alan - yeah you're right, the City is not entirely a meritocracy. I was trying to point out that some people from modest backgrounds manage to land very, very well paid jobs. And as I've said before, times are changing... I guess you know that the banks are shifting more and more to conventional recruitment paths. Maybe because of the changing skills needed to be a succesful trader.


James - didn't mean to imply that they're worth more as individuals than the rest of us. That's obviously not true. I am purely talking in financial terms - percentages of how much money they bring in. In fact I'm pretty sure you know what I mean, but are just picking an argument. The stereotypical description of a trader is slightly outdated, and not really relevant to the points I'm trying to get across.


Sean - I think I'm talking about another post. However, I have read the post you mention, and it sounds incredibly unlikely that they would have made the same amount by investing in a high street savings account (and anyway, how do you think high street banks make their money?) The argument doesn't really hold any water. Investing and trading is central to the economy. Even in Scandanavia.

I can only refute the charge that i am agin trade and investment so many times before i feel the need to do something more useful. . .


the point is not to argue against capitalism but to harness it for as much good as possible before we do run out of resources or come up with a better plan.


so we have established that the scandancviam countries are capitalist countries. At last. Now can we look at how they do some things a little differently for the benefit of their citizens while seemingly managing to avoid everyone being on the bread line? Can we? Great. . .

So where do people stand on tax breaks, including income tax breaks for vcs and reports that more and more massive companies aren't paying corporate tax in one way or another.


I assume that most of us think that huge profits for companies are fine as long as the benefit for the greater community is evident through tax revenues, employment and trade.


So what do we think when the bonuses being paid out are on largely untaxed profits and the possibility that the tax breaks given to VCs and the asset-stripping investment banks aren't putting as much in the national coffers as we might wish?


Even though the forum is be no means wholly set out against the bonusses, we should keep in mind that 'earning money for their company' in many of these cases, isn't the same as 'earning money for the economy' especially where tax is concerned.


Add to this the argument that many of the individuals recieving the bonusses aren't paying the same % tax as most of us and the pay gap isn't between the 'super rich' and the 'poor' but the 'super rich' and 'everyone else'. Surely there is good reason to feel just a little peeved.


SeanMacG's point is right. It is about encouraging and harnessing trade and growth in a way that benefits society to the greatest extent. Is it that at the moment, we don't feel that this is the case and that city bonusses are an example of this?




Still, the bonus bubble seems to now have burst thanks to efforts by the US to get more people on the property ladder. Swings and rounabouts.

> So where do people stand on tax breaks, including income tax breaks for vcs


I have no problem with this. Do you?


"The pensions and other payments listed below are to be disregarded as stated. These are non-taxable war pensions and any increase in pension payable as a result of injury on duty or a work-related illness


A wounds pension or disability pension to the extent disregarded under S315(1) of ICTA 1988 (War Pension)

An annuity or additional pension payable to a holder of the Victoria Cross, George Cross or any other decoration mentioned in Section 317 of the Taxes Act 2001. (War pension)"

Bear in mind that companies pay VAT, NI contribtutions, business rates, corporation tax, stamp duty and myriad of other taxes. Looking at corporation tax muddies the water. Also consider employment and the resultant benefits.


And no, I do get peeved off that some people are super rich and I am not.

Businesses start up in the full knowledge of teh range of tax they need to pay - avoidance is not a "hidden cost"


A certain global media group which may or may not be owned by someone from teh southern hemisphere is famous for avoiding most of the taxes you mention above, while at the same time seeking british nationality


Ditto anyone rich enough to afford decent accountants can (and do) avoid most UK taxes on an individual basis - what make them "better" than us exactly?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...