Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's not the case that anything negative about Kingsdale is automatically deleted, but it is the case that libellous comments and ones with direct reference to the exam investigation are removed, as they should be.


I beg to differ. A question from me just mentioning the said investigation was taken off this precise thread. I do not understand why just mentioning the investigation could be deemed libellous.


I'm not worried about the investigation - there is very much more to it than meets the eye.


There has been a complete news blackout about the investigation and its progress. I think it is not really appropriate when so many year 6 parents are making potential life shaping decisions about their child's future.

Prickle - your message was removed as it invited responses which once again would open the thread up to libellous comments and responses. I do not remove threads that simply give a balanced negative/positive view on the school as a whole.

All I can suggest to those of you wanting more information is that you contact the school, or relevant investigatory bodies. Remember that this is a public forum on which anyone can post, and the accuracy of information/intention of posters cannot be verified by ourselves.


I would imagine that once the investigation is complete the results will be made public either via the school or local press.


Thanks for your understanding,


FRM

BB100 - I can tell you that two posts have been removed from this thread. One asking for more information on the investigation, and one by yourself making reference to previous posts on another thread, also relating to the investigation. I do not remove comments that are simply negative about the school, only ones that make reference to topics which we have previously explained are not to be discussed here.
  • Administrator

Please contact the school directly of information, please don't rely on this forum for making potential life shaping decisions about your child's future, that would be silly.


Libellous comments are removed so users many have not seen all of them. If you do see any please report them.


If users are wish to continue discussing topics which we have asked them not to discuss for legal reason then please post up your real name, address and contact number with each post so that you can be contacted directly by any legal bodies that wish to contact you. That way we can continue running the forum without being hassled because of comments by a few.


ps Please note that the user Prickle is different from the user Pickle.

Hello Again,

I visited the school with my Husband,Daughter also my best friend and her Daughter.

We was very impressed with what the school has to offer and also was a good experiance to see the school on a working day, Which so far not many schools do.

Have heard from a few more parents that they are happy with the school and am visiting again with another friend as she has heard positive feedback also.

Headmaster seems like he has his head and heart in making sure your child has a good education,Also a pleasant experiance while at scool.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I completely agree.  Mickey did some work for a couple I know and from this, I asked him to do some plastering for me.  He works to a really high standard, is reliable, fair priced and very clean and considerate.  He does the work himself, so you do not get random people coming to your home.  If you are looking for a trades person MJ Lawless Plastering Services is your person.  His number is 07930 678 989
    • Current status of Planning Application 24/AP/2314 is the approval document was published 31 December 2025 with effect 1 January 2026.  https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/files/E5F5EC6005598720843BC00D7E6A7D11/pdf/24_AP_2314-DECISION_NOTICE_-_MAJOR_-_GRANT-4194604.pdf It has 41 conditions many of which must be confirmed via further applications into Southwark Council before works on site can begin. I've not seen any applications to start discharging those conditions yet - amazed some of these have not been prepared by the developer. No work of any kind is allowed on site until some of those conditions are discharged. Additionally the sites proximity to the rail tracks means Network Rail will have to be heavily involved. My work experiences with Network Rail would suggest quite some delay will come rom them alone.  With the national government and Southwark Council planning to reduce the proportion of social housing from 35% to 20%, and some schemes in Southwark are now only provided 2% social housing. It would be amazing if the developer doesn't seek an amended viability appraisal to reduce social housing for the scheme or even taller buildings.
    • I did the same on a bus.  The whole bus cheered!  The religious nut shut up.  It is not acceptable for people to try and force their beliefs on you
    • Hello    Any one selling a second hand coshh cabinet?    Thanks xx 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...