Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Area: Dulwich Wood Park / Paxton Green

Time/Date: c. 10-10am Tue 3rd Jan

Age/Gender: 20-ish/male


While this is marginally out of the ED area, this individual will be transient.


He approached a woman who had pulled up and parked on a side road. He ran up to the drivers window screaming for her to get out brandisihg a chisle like weapon. Unsuccessful, he walked to the nearest bus stop and took a bus.


** Police **

From 999 to the team turning up, 'MD' Soutwark Police, excellent and clear communication with support. Great guys!


Specific details have not been included for good reason.



fM.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> why/ so I can exclude any tall raving men with

> chisels from any concern?


Yeah you've got a point, I mean why even include age or gender in the description


Just 'screaming chisel wielding person' would have sufficed

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DMW23 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Love the fact he got a bus instead, bet he used

> > his Oyster card too

>

>

> If he did, could he be traced via that?


Yes I suppose a description of the person is way too much of a giveaway. It takes the intrigue out of it if you know what you're looking for


I can see it now on crime watch "Did you see a Male with a chisel and an Oyster card"


Seriously, this is lame. What did the man with the chisel actually look like?


Simple question, or was he in disguise?

This is about the 'what happened'.


Discriptions are in the hands of the police. Male and 20-ish are purely indicators. Remember 'chisel-like'. its neither a 'chisel' nor a 'like'.


Nay over estimate nor query, just get the event.



You have all been remarkably astute!



fM.

"This is about the 'what happened'. "


It's also about people being aware. For their safety, which I consider fairly important.


If not for a good bit of gossip, the purpose of this thread is to make people aware, alert and vigilant, so that they can stay safe, and perhaps report possible suspects (Although obviously that is less relevant now.)


The point is, providing a better description would help keep people safer and make the guy more likely to meet justice.


Perhaps I'm wrong, and there is legitimate "good reason" not to describe them, in which case that's acceptable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Maybe if you indicated what you were reviewing, pub, gastro pub, high-end gourmet, local Italian etc. - whatever classifications you wanted, then you need only indicate that your stars referred to overall quality in that category. So it it's pub grub then 5 stars means it's great pub grub, but not the same experience as 5 stars in a high end gourmet category. Your star system could then include implicitly value for money as well. 
    • Does OP know they can sell everything but alcohol even without a license?😄
    • Thanks, it's a real dilemma whether to do star ratings. A few people have asked me to do them but I've tried to resist as they are too reductive - people will look at them and won't read review! and they are difficult too - my last review of Victoria Inn, i'd give it five stars for value for money - how can you knock two courses for £18? – but 2 stars for quality - edible but nothing special. Which I guess is why some sites give star ratings for different things...
    • ok - Jeremy himself is against mandatory vaccines. Is he as extreme as his brother? No? Is it fair to discuss how the overall view of that family would inform Jeremy's response to the pandemic? I would argue very much so    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...