Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd eat some of the people on the forum.


Now that you mention it, I rather fancy your liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.


> And that's Catholics HAL, not Christians per se.


No - I don't think so. All Christians (even vegans) are supposed to take communion - even if only symbolically. Otherwise they're not true Christians. What sort of Christians were you thinking of?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I used to decant a 1.5 pint Bachelors packet soup mix into three equal portions and eat with two

> slices of bread and a one inch-cubed square of cheddar ('number two') - every day - for two years.


Is that what brought on the asterisks?

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it took my life to save ten I'd happily give

> it.......so I wouldn't do absolutely 'anything' to

> survive. We are nothing important at the end of

> the day. The world will not stop turning because

> anyone of us lives or dies.

------------------------------------------------


I TOTALLY agree!

I mean if it were like 8 or 9 people there is no way I'd do myself in for that!!

Anything over ten is cool though.

;-)

I think when push comes to shove most people would do anything to survive.

We live in a very insulated society and most people seriously believe that events like genocide happen to 'other people and not us'.

I'm not so certain how far we really are from all that.

We just kid ourselves.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My point is that it's only symbolic if you're not

> Catholic - it's still just bread and wine. Only

> Catholics suppose themselves to be eating the

> actual body and blood of Christ through the magic

> of transubstantiation.

______________________________________________


Add some cheese & a few "hail bloody marys" for a Sunday hangover picnic

These days I think it behoves us all to take along some Ryvita breakfast biscuits when travelling by plane over the Andes or hiking in the mountains, so that we don't HAVE to eat each other. That said, I don't think you can slit the jugular and drink the still-warm blood of a biscuit.

Hmmm...how far would you go if alone, if with a loved one or with strangers...


If I knew there was no other option, I might consider cutting my arm off but being an optimistic type usually, I think I'd probably hope that someone did come along to my godforsaken spot and wait until I was too weak to actually survive cutting off my arm and die anyhow...


Plane-wise - I do count the seats to the emergency exit and if in a window seat with people who don't look like good survival candidates in the aisle rows, I have amused myself by figuring out the best route over the top of the seats to avoid being stuck behind them. :-$

Usually in an air crash they are sweeping up tiny bits and pieces from a three mile radius, and in the case of the Lockerby crash it left a crater deep enough to drop a four storey block of flats.


The idea of hopping across the backs of seats to beat everyone to safety is unlikely.


When there is an investigation following a crash, most of the time is spent working out who died first and what the order of death came to the travellers for the sake of insurance companies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Leave it white then new people can paint to their taste - that is why in show properties, they are white throughout or neutral. Def no feature wall. Might consider a lump sum for flooring as opposed to going grey. Ideally no curtains at all but if you wish then maybe blinds in lounge and bedroom.
    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...