Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know I don't officially currently live in ED (but will be back soonish) and its a compliment that I value the opinions here .. so ladies please don't shake your heads in despair (I know hubby is ;-) .. but the expat forum here is pretty formal and general (no feeling in it!)


So we were staying in an awesome spot on Vietnam's coast and had intended going diving - I had a small thought about hubby and I both being away from our son in a off land, under water, foreign country etc - but I dismissed it quickly. We're completely ok with leaving him in the hotel with a sitter as they're all so lovely and he's a friendly contented chap so has loads of fun. A day later my hubby mentioned the same thought .. so we decided not to go diving 'in case' something happened to us .. are we being silly? over reacting? will we ever feel ok about doing slightly 'wilder' sports? because of kids? He's only 15 months so maybe we're still newish parents ..

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13817-parents-worries/
Share on other sites

Poor you Linzkg, but your instinct is right. I know once I had kids I was still OK with putting me or my husband in slightly risky situations, but never together at the same time - just in case. Statistically the increased risk is probably not born out, but instinctively you both need to act to ensure that one of you will be around to protect & raise your babe. I guess it's natures way of ensuring survival of the species? Anyway I'd like to tell you that it gets easier to ignore the instinct as they get older, but if anything I've found the opposite to be true, possibly cos we've had more kids so the stakes are raised. Now, even traveling on Sensiblemans motorbike with him to the other side of London gives me pause for thought. Ah well, watch out adrenaline junkies cos I'll be coming to join you when the kids are grown.

That's a good way of looking at it - I'll blame it on nature and natural instinct - not me being silly and overacting!! I'm hoping the kiddies will eventually join us on our pursuits too.

Over night we've even now discussed giving up our driver in a few months (giving us a while to settle into the local way of life) and swapping onto mopeds as the kids seem to behave naturally and safely on them.

Thanks :-)

Molly - no, its what we were expecting - can't wait to get stuck in! A lot more expensive though .. they automatically put the "western" hat on you and assume you're rolling in it as your company pays for everything - but we're breaking them down so they're taking it easy on us - especially when it comes to house hunting (or 'villas' as they like to call them here) as they're not showing us the complete castles anymore but reasonable sized and manageable villas. The food is yummmmmmy. You'll have to come see for yourselves though ;-) ps, the girls will be celebrities here. x

Makes perfect sense - we would have gone one at a time.


Equally, though, it would have been to avoid using the local bbsitter. We would never leave the ch with someone we did not know inside out personally. Things do happen, one in a million, perhaps, but that's enough for me.

Ah good to hear from you, and glad you're settling in okay.

Totally natural and normal instinct to have re leaving the boy while you do something adventurous. There's a series on BBC1 at the mo, a 4 parter on Sunday nights in case you can get it on i-player, called Single Father. Mother of 4 kids gets killed on her bike, leaving Dad (David Tenant) to bring up the kids. I felt sick the whole way through watching it, decided never to cycle to work EVER again, and that I would start writing my son letters telling him what he's like and what I'm like so that if I died he would know (imagining that my husband would be a bit rubbish at that kind of thing). I even thought: "I know! I'll hide the letters in his red book and then they'll be found". I'm probably confessing a bit too much here, and I'm not even drunk, but irrational or not, the idea of leaving our bubs to fend for themselves is heartbreaking.

Lou - darn, was hoping you'd miss this one ;-) Back to work soon hey - good luck x

Polly - we can't get iPlayer here (gutted as missed finale of Britain's next top model and my family's crazy gap year, can't watch Australia's masterchef ..) but that series does sound interesting, sad as well. Imagine its good for the men to watch too. Ha ha, I'm sure every mother lets that thought slip into their head at some stage - the 'what ifs' but letters are an interesting thought - even in general to write them for fun almost and your son can read them when he grows up regardless .. horrible thought though :-(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...