Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just reminds me of the odd time I travel on the tube (or at a gig) when occasionally someone shoves their way through and even at my advanced age I give them a little shove, elbow, kick. Was gobsmacked - we know the bloke is no statesman but this is just bullying (and makes the nation a laughing stock). Shame the chap from Montenegro didn't deck him one! Wonder what the excuse will be this time.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just reminds me of the odd time I travel on the

> tube (or at a gig) when occasionally someone

> shoves their way through and even at my advanced

> age I give them a little shove, elbow, kick. Was

> gobsmacked - we know the bloke is no statesman but

> this is just bullying (and makes the nation a

> laughing stock). Shame the chap from Montenegro

> didn't deck him one! Wonder what the excuse will

> be this time.


I'd likeep to think that Mentenegro chap has plotted some super passive agressive revenge. Maybe he's going to swap Trump?s well done steak for rare, or some chocolate cake from poundland.

Trump has done more for climate change than any other person on the planet - in one stroke he has united the world to reaffirm their commitment to the Paris agreement [& even more] & has even united much of the US in favour of climate change - even the Mayor of Pittsburgh has affirmed their approval of the Paris agreement. We should be greatful to Trump for his good efforts.
I'm left wondering how far US cities and states might be able to create an alternative power structure in the country. The mayors and governors pledging to support the Paris Accord and the sanctuary city network could act as a model for that. That's the strength of the federal system I guess - it offers a powerful alternative to Presidential control.

A few months old but still relevant: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-meyerson-trump-state-conflict-20170201-story.html


Trump could punish liberal states like California by withholding federal payments. But California could counter by withholding federal taxes, or adding state tax to imports, such as vehicles that do not comply to CA's strict emissions laws.

Thanks Saffron. Very interesting piece. So yes - with California and New York City in a leadership role, we might be entering an era of reduced US Federal control and increased State and City power. From a historical/political perspective that would be fascinating.
Macron is doing well at home since his election. There was a fear that as he had no established party as such, he would be a lame duck President when it came to getting his reforms through the French parliament. But his En Marche! movement is now expected to do very well in their up-coming elections, giving him a clear majority to carry them out...https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-france-election-poll-idUKKBN18S5M3

Yes. And he looks happy to job-share the 'Leader of the Free World' role with Merkel and Trudeau.


It'll be really interesting to see how far France changes. That France is essentially 'unchangeable' seems to have been a mantra for a very long time. It can't hold true forever.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Macron is doing well at home since his election.

> There was a fear that as he had no established

> party as such, he would be a lame duck President

> when it came to getting his reforms through the

> French parliament. But his En Marche! movement is

> now expected to do very well in their up-coming

> elections, giving him a clear majority to carry

> them

> out...https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-france-ele

> ction-poll-idUKKBN18S5M3



Wait and see. I think the unions might have something to say about down-sizing its bloated civil service and ending the 35-hour working week.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> WTF HTF can the US use anti-science to pull out of

> the climate change agreement. Arrogant, ignorant,

> small minded, shockiing.



Not necessarily. It's generally accepted that the Paris Accord, while being the best international agreement we have so far, will do very little to solve climate change.


At the moment we have green technology subsidised by tax payers that doesn't work. Wind turbines that need to be turned off if it's too windy. Solar panels that cost more to produce and run than the energy they provide.


It amuses me that Facebook and Apple are pretending to be outraged. Between them they have probably been responsible or more electricity consumption (in the West at least) manufacturing tablets and phones, constantly recharging them, to engage in social media.


Resist the knee-jerk reaction malumbu.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Not necessarily. It's generally accepted that the

> Paris Accord, while being the best international

> agreement we have so far, will do very little to

> solve climate change.


What's your definition of "generally accepted"? Every nation in the world has signed up to it except (now) the USA, Syria and Nicaragua. That's pretty general, really.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It amuses me that Facebook and Apple are

> pretending to be outraged. Between them they have

> probably been responsible or more electricity

> consumption (in the West at least) manufacturing

> tablets and phones, constantly recharging them, to

> engage in social media.


Oh, and what utter nonsense. Yeah, global warming is down to people using mobile telephones for social media, not two centuries of carbon belching factories and petrol engines. "More electricity consumption..." Than what?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...