Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Theresa May just hasn't got it yet - if you ring Trump he'll just shout at you (especially if you happen to be a woman). I can only imagine her frustration (or maybe she really is robotic enough not to care)


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/trump-berated-theresa-may-over-brexit-and-iran-from-air-force-one-a3989721.html

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

"This is the kind of life that Donald Trump wishes he was living. Everything in his house is gold and yet he literally could never make this piano work. It's not about the gold; it's about the swagger. Queen Elizabeth has that Gold Piano Energy. Donald Trump has that Rusty Harmonica at a Yard Sale Energy."


https://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/a25684406/queen-elizabeth-gold-piano-christmas/

  • 1 month later...

Interesting. Just watching ?Beyond 100 Days? on the BBC News Channel.


The point was made how important the coming Presidential Election is in terms of whether Trump has done anything wrong.


If Mueller has a case against Trump it has to be brought before 5 years due to a statute of limitations. However if Trump wins again he will be protected by his office and it will be too late to bring the case.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If Mueller has a case against Trump it has to be

> brought before 5 years due to a statute of

> limitations. However if Trump wins again he will

> be protected by his office and it will be too late

> to bring the case.


I have heard it rumoured that the intention was always for him to do his four novelty years before claiming ill health or some such and handing the baton to Pence, but he hadn't anticipated the legal trouble and is playing exactly the game you mention.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > If Mueller has a case against Trump it has to

> be

> > brought before 5 years due to a statute of

> > limitations. However if Trump wins again he

> will

> > be protected by his office and it will be too

> late

> > to bring the case.

>

> I have heard it rumoured that the intention was

> always for him to do his four novelty years before

> claiming ill health or some such and handing the

> baton to Pence, but he hadn't anticipated the

> legal trouble and is playing exactly the game you

> mention.


In my view Pence could be worse - not as mad but possible badder. His views are strange to say the least.

Pence would be worse. He takes Revelations literally. A Republican SCOTUS and a hardcore Christian in the Oval? Handmaids Tale will start to look eerily familiar...


I?ve also often felt that Trump was just keeping it wa for Pemce; to be fair the Dem?s are doing themselves no favours, they?re as fractured as Labour, just hiding it better right now. The ?progressives? - who we would see as moderate Tories but the flyover states see as full on socialists (another concept the US doesn?t really understand) - hurting them. The Dem?s stand a good chance of losing 2020 Unless they can coalesce under one candidate capable of appealing to the middle ground. Right now they?re just running to the extremes (like everyone else).


Trump never expected to win, and the GOP thought they could control him. Since then everyone has been trying to work out what next, and Trump only cares about looking good.


His attacks on the media were comical at first, but now they?re getting pretty worrying. The First Amendment has the force of God over there, but that won?t stop a nutterwirh a gun...Trump is empowering bigotry and hatred, actively empowering it, because it all distracts from his problems.

Someone on Quora asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" Nate White, a Brit responded.


A few things spring to mind.


Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.


For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.


So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump?s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.


Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.


I don?t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.


But with Trump, it?s a fact. He doesn?t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.


Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.


And scarily, he doesn?t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.


There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It?s all surface.


Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.


Well, we don?t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.


And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.


Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.


He?s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.


He?s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.


And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.


That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.


There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.


So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy? is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.

* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.


This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.


After all, it?s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.


God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.


He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.


In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.


And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:


'My God? what? have? I? created?


If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.

  • 4 months later...

So we have a British Trump now (that's for another thread). A chap who was telling me how good this was also said how Trump is regularly quoted out of context by the liberal media, including his recent twitter storm (go back to your own country). I thought perhaps he has a point and I only saw a selected part of the article. So as someone who wants an objective view I checked. The full quote was:


"interesting to see ?Progressive? Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run"


I can't see how this was selected or abridged. It appears to be the full tweet. So I expect this chap just followed some right wing news feed and decided that it must be correct.

G W Bush has a well developed sense of humour, he?s a funny guy, self deprecating and aware.


Trump is uniquely vacant in the ?funny ha ha? despot department.



And and and.....who ever said ?British Trump?? in connection to BJ ?


Nobody, other than vainglorious TMP himself.

Someone messed with the Presidential Seal when Trump spoke at the Turning Point group. The seal had a double headed eagle, golf clubs and a new motto.


https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/25/trump-appears-altered-presidential-seal-turning-point-usa-event/1824386001/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
    • I think, from memory for LHR, we are under a holding pattern so if LHR is backed up we may get more planes overhead. There are multiple holding patterns so it is not always ours that is used and it generally depends on the wind direction as to which is used. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...