Jump to content

A general thread to discuss Trump


intexasatthe moment

Recommended Posts

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And is Trumps filing to run again in 2020 have any

> particular significance ?


Does anyone know if that is standard practice (i.e. did Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, etc do it) or is this something newly cooked up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen reports for back in the day, certainly Obama didn't file to run for his second term until April 2011 for the 2012 election.


ETA Just looked, Trump at 47 months off the election is the earliest filer in recent memory by a long chalk - Obama at 19 months off next, Reagan and Bush snr latest filers at 12 months out. I guess a president has to get his application in in good time so he can do fundraising, but it looks very much as though Trump's team have spotted a loophole in their favour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's being described as unusual


http://www.azfamily.com/story/34380443/trump-breaks-precedent-files-on-first-day-as-candidate-for-re-election



" According to campaign filings with the Federal Election Commission, Trump?s filing as a candidate comes more than two years earlier in his term than any incumbent presidential candidate in at least 38 years."




47 months- Donald Trump filed on Jan. 20, 2017 for the 2020 election.

19 months- Barack Obama filed on April 4, 2011 for his 2012 re-election bid.

18 months- George W. Bush filed on May 16, 2003 to run for re-election in 2004.

19 months- Bill Clinton filed on April 14, 1995 for his 1996 re-election campaign.

12 months- George H.W. Bush cut it even closer, not filing until Oct. 11, 1991 for the 1992 election.

12 months- Reagan had similarly close timing, filing on October 17, 1983 to run in 1984.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Australia PM is just being polite I reckon - although they do say "abruptly ended" rather than "hung up".


"The call ended courteously, that's all I want to say about that,"


"Australia Sky News sources reported that the President "yelled" at Malcolm Turnbull "

"Mr Trump reportedly criticized the Prime Minister .. and boasted about his electoral college win."

"Mr Trump hung up after 25 minutes and said "This was the worst call by far"

"He also reportedly said to Mr Turnbull he was "going to get killed" ..... politically" :)



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-yelled-hang-up-phonecall-australia-prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull-refugee-immigrants-a7559381.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sick of him. Like it or not he was democratically elected (although his next election I fear may be less then democratic). Unless he carks it of natural causes we are in for a shit storm, but leaving the EU means we will suck up to him as much as we possibly can, probably by necessity, so probably best to develop a thick skin early and just hope that he has a degree of sanity and does not start a war!


If someone kills him it will be a shitstorm of biblical proportions!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I e found it particularly galling to see how quickly politicians have fallen in behind Trump (especially those on the right). Often politicians that generally I respect, or would have expected to speak out more. This article puts it well https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/05/donald-trump-lies-belief-totalitarianism?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Link to comment
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is easy, with so much craziness, to almost

> become immune to it.


That is exactly right, and why we should keep posting and (where appropriate) re-threading. This from Trump for me is key:


"I say it's better to get along with Russia than not. And if Russia helps us in the fight against Isis [so-called Islamic State], which is a major fight, and Islamic terrorism all over the world - that's a good thing. Will I get along with him? I have no idea. (square brackets inserted by the rather overly-squeamish BBC news editor).


He knows very well (given the half-recognised fact that he is a simulation of himself) that he must identify an overwhelmingly self-evident foe to anchor his presidency in 'reality' (the judicial fight back against his immigration orders, though absolutely right, will reinforce his support).


Meanwhile, Ukraine is greatly destabilised and he is promising to "get along" with Putin to fight the greater foe of Isis. Now I wonder what opportunity that presents to Russia?


The UK govt meanwhile is frightened out of its wits. It knows that it is moving us out of the natural security of the EU and feels it must now depend on a "special" relationship with Trump. At some point Parliament will wake up: but I doubt it will be in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Finally, top secret filming has revealed the face behind the shadow of one dulwich Be afraid, be very afraid because V is coming for you in your nightmares 
    • Something smells fishy here.  Two separate people, multiple purchase, each time saying chicken was off.  If that's the case Environmental Health would be all over the shop like ants swarming a carcass.  Can't quite put my finger on what's really going on here 🤔  
    • If anyone has a Nectar card and shops at Dog Kennel Hill it will learn what you buy. I regularly get Nectar prices/offers on things I buy to donate to the Albrighton. The donation I plan to take round next week contains toothpaste that was on offer at a Nectar price. Tins of tomatoes, pasta and cereal have also come up in the past.    Put the item in your trolley and drop it in the donation box on the way out. Multi use offer buy some every day, take it home then donate a few. 
    • I am faintly amused by the cries of horror when the overtly political actions of Southwark Council Labour (their car hatred does after all form part of their manifesto) is countered by what might possibly be political action of others (although there is some evidence to support it being a groundswell of purely local and not party-affiliated activity). Who is behind Southwark Labour party one might ask - is it Militant Trotskyites? From where are they being funded? The Kremlin, Beijing?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...