Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We are/ were in the process of buying our first property. Our offer was accepted below the asking price, solicitor instructed. Then came the call, that someone put a much higher offer in. We did not budge we thought/ still think agent was bluffing, 2 days later agent franticly calls that vendor changed their mind they still want to go with our offer. Than five days later agent calls, there is a real offer on the table that is higher than we put in. Now we are furious, we think for all this time we were led on, whilst agent still conducted viewings behind our back. We already spent couple of hundreds of pounds on solicitor/ mortgage fees.

Is there any advice out there for us, what we could have done better? We were assured by agent that they have cancelled all viewings..Also agent said that vendor does not wish to disclose how much higher was the offer and that the offer come from another estate agent who was also advertising the property.

The estate agent works for the vendor and as such will try to get as much as they can for a property as that maximises the commission they get

With two agents in play they normally charge a higher percentage to the vendor as there is a bigger risk of not making anything over the sale should the other agent sell it.

Sadly there is nothing you can do although it may be worth finding the other agent and putting an offer in slightly higher then you have now to see if it is accepted, if it is your agent is bluffing remove the other (higher) offer and hold your ground ... If your new offer isn't accepted then you have to consider your next move.

There is not much you can do unfortunately. It's easy to blame the agents, but it's the seller's decision whether to keep taking viewings after accepting an offer and whether to allow/encourage gazumping (it's pretty unethical in my opinion).
...in fact, you might want to write a polite letter to the seller, explaining how their behaviour has caused you unnecessary stress and expense and that you think it's pretty poor. it might make them think about their actions (or not), but at the least, it could prove cathartic.

Using more than one agent can be a sign of a seller who is very keen to maximise the selling price.


When an offer is accepted, its worth asking that you see this acceptance in an email (written from the seller to the agent). It's not a legal commitment, but its at least evidence that the seller has accepted your offer and that they state that the house is off the market.


maybe next time ask to see something like this before engaging solicitors / suffering costs


In your case, whilst agent 1 may not have being taking additional viewings, as he's happy to have a sale and the commission, he cant speak for agent 2, who still wants to steal the sale. Hence it's useful to have something informal in writing from the vendors that no one is still advertising the property for sale.


All a little too late now though. Bad luck, not a very nice outcome.

Agree that it's the vendor who is likely to be more at fault than the agent.


I don't agree with this from Artful: "The estate agent works for the vendor and as such will try to get as much as they can for a property as that maximises the commission they get "


Of course, they will try to get as much as possible for the property, but the stronger driver for them will be to clinch a sale regardless of it maybe being a small % below asking. For example if they are on 2% with the vendor and the property is worth ?500K, a sale at ?485k still brings in fee of ?9.7k. So whilst the vendor may not be best pleased about a drop of ?15K the agent can probably live with dropping ?300 - especially if a likely outcome is that if he doesn't put that deal through, his competitor might sell it and he'll get nothing.

Always make your offer conditional on the house being taken off the market.


Assuming the seller agrees, make sure you check the listings have been updated to 'sold' the next day, and phone the estate agent to chase them up if (when) you find they haven't. Also do a regular RightMove search until you have exchanged, in case the seller advertises again via another agent - that happened to me when buying my current house, and a quick call to remind them (via the original agent) that the offer was subject to the house being off the market, had the desired effect.


Sellers will be cheeky and try to get a higher offer if they can. But they are often more worried about losing the offer they already have, so your position is usually stronger than you might feel. (In fairness, buyers are often cheeky too - simultaneous offers on multiple properties, fully intending to cancel all but one. Just the rules of the game really.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Which is why I was careful to specify "the true definition"! A bit like "dilemma", generally used for any tricky decisions but should really be where there are only two options, both with equally bad outcomes...
    • I raise your pedantry. Language evolves and Merriam Webster gives the meaning as "drastically reduced especially in number." The word originally derived from the Roman practice of killing every tenth soldier in a mutinous army but I'm sure nobody uses the word in that context now.
    • Thanks all for the replies.  When the roofer come to look at the roof more recently,  there were holes in the felt in the same place that the original leak had been,  as well as where the new leak is.  There doesn't seem to be a reason why a hole the the felt was the cause of one leak and not the other.  It would have been good to have got everything sorted at the same time,  rather than having to put scaffolding up again.  But my main issue is around the vagueness of a 10 year guarantee.  After work was done the first time,  the roofer gave us a summary of the work and just wrote '10 Yr guarantee' after, without specifying what exactly that means.   If a roofer comes and doesn't diagnose the problem quite right (which i imagine is common with roofs, given it's not always clear what's causing a leak), the guarantee doesn't seem to apply. But anyway,  we'll be getting a different roofer, because we think he should have checked the felt under the tiles the first time round.  
    • We used to feed the birds, but once the parakeets discovered this they just took over, scaring away all the other species and eating everything in sight. I tried scaring them away with a Nerf gun, but they just didn't care. I know it will open a can of worms (no pun intended) but I really think  the parakeet population needs to be reduced; yes they are pretty, but they are just like a plague of locusts when it comes to food supplies.  PS apologies for pedantry @malumbu but the true definition of "decimate" is to reduce by a tenth... 🫤
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...