Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lovely forumites...a little question I can't seem to find an answer to in any of the other threads on pushchairs....


For Christmas my mother-in-law is kindly buying us a second buggy for the car, holidays, flights, etc and to last us as Baby Knomester gets to big for his pram (we have a very good but rather large Britax B-Smart with carrycot).


I've had a quick look at the Maclaren range which everyone seems to be a fan of and just wondered whether, with experience, you would go for the XT or the XLR (the main differences I can see are that the XLR is slightly bigger, heavier and comes with foot muff included)....?


Thank you!

We sold our well-loved XT and bought an XLR so that we could take advantage of being able to strap an infant carrycot to the top of the XLR (you can't with the XT), turning it into a mini-pram, parent-facing. It's slightly wider and bigger than the XT, and much more expensive. I'd suggest you go with the XT unless the infant carrycot is useful for you - and I think the Knomelet is beyond that stage?

We have an XT, we got it as a lighter alternative to the travel system buggy and now we only ever use the XT! I'd say if it's just for car/holidays etc then definately go with the XT on the basis of weight and size. We found we could put the footmuff from our old buggy on it and have also bought a lightweight one that folds up nicely with it.


K

How old will your baby be by then? The Quest is lighter than either of those, but think it's 6 months and up (or poss 3 months? does have several recline positions, but not fully flat hence not from birth) - and poss a better car/holiday option as such?
We also had a britax vigour which i suspect is the "ancestor" of the one you have. great but too heavy to get around now baby is older. we were going to buy a quest which is sold in the uk/us as suitable from 3 months but in europe from 6. the idea was to have a lighter buggy for public transport. in the end we got an xt because our order got messed up. we are very happy with it but i agree with belle and ko quest is probably best option as a second buggy. i think xlr is great but for newborns because of carrycot option. it is also wider than xt or quest. we use two footmuffs on our xt, one maclaren and another thinner oner. we have no problem folding the buggy with them on.
Thank you thank you! I think we'll definitely rule out the XLR and road (shop) test the XT and the Quest. I think I'm erring towards the XT as the Quest is only 0.4kg lighter than the XT and not much more compact but the XT looks like it'll be a more comfortable ride for Baby Knomester.

I was between the Techno and Quest, I erred towards Techno until my partner pointed out that the whole purpose of a second buggy was a small light buggy for holidays

, boot of car and bus travel. Def look at the two together, the wheels on the Techno are much larger as is the frame, doesn't fold as small either.


Happy with my Quest although def wouldn't want as an only buggy!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...