Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> That Xoco is gone really is a shame.


I was unaware of that too. That's disappointing as it was good the one time I tried it.


excellent trip advisor rating too https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowUserReviews-g186338-d10868451-r451931662-Xoco_Bar_Grill-London_England.html

I don't think it's surprising that Xoco has gone.


It had a strange menu, strange decor and terrible music. They turned it off when we asked because we were the only people in there, but if we hadn't been, I'm not sure I could have stayed.


The food we had was OK but by no means outstanding.


I'm sorry to see such a new business fail, but I'm really not surprised.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think it's surprising that Xoco has gone.

>

> It had a strange menu, strange decor and terrible

> music. They turned it off when we asked because we

> were the only people in there, but if we hadn't

> been, I'm not sure I could have stayed.

>

> The food we had was OK but by no means

> outstanding.

>

> I'm sorry to see such a new business fail, but I'm

> really not surprised.


It would seem none of that had anything to do with why it closed..


Foxy.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't think it's surprising that Xoco has

> gone.

> >

> > It had a strange menu, strange decor and

> terrible

> > music. They turned it off when we asked because

> we

> > were the only people in there, but if we hadn't

> > been, I'm not sure I could have stayed.

> >

> > The food we had was OK but by no means

> > outstanding.

> >

> > I'm sorry to see such a new business fail, but

> I'm

> > really not surprised.

>

> It would seem none of that had anything to do with

> why it closed..

>

> Foxy.



Why did it close, then?


It had only just opened, after months of brown paper over the windows!

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> derwentgrove Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > Why did it close, then?

> >

> > It hasn't traded since the recent police raid.



>

>

> Is that actually true, or a not very funny

> "joke"?

>

> Fox, you seem to know, so why not tell us??!


It's not a joke. I was told about the raid by another restaurant owner on LL last night.

Eyes on the prize everyone please. This thread is about Swedesh. I've searched the planning portal to no avail, it does seem suspicious to me that a whole row of shops are now empty in a prime retail spot sandwiched between a cinema and a successful butchery. Does anyone have more information on this? Do Parkhill own those buildings?


Louisa.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Sue... Just drop it.



Why did you post about it on this thread then? It wasn't me who brought up Xoco, nor me who posted that it had closed, nor me who hinted as to the "real reasons".


FFS.


If you want it dropped, maybe practice what you preach, eh?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > Sue... Just drop it.

>

>

> Why did you post about it on this thread then? It

> wasn't me who brought up Xoco, nor me who posted

> that it had closed, nor me who hinted as to the

> "real reasons".

>

> FFS.

>

> If you want it dropped, maybe practice what you

> preach, eh?


I did not mention Xoco.. Michael Palaeologus did.. and I simply said it had closed..


It is your very self that continues to harp on about why it has closed..

and I do not know the facts of why it has closed.. So I have nothing further to say on the matter..


Appology accepted in advance.


Foxy.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy, if you're going to drop gnomic comments

> about Sue's assumed reasons for the closure,

> telling her those aren't the reasons, it's fair

> enough for her to ask what you mean, isn't it?


That is enough.. This thresd is about Swadesh closing.


DF.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Foxy, if you're going to drop gnomic comments

> > about Sue's assumed reasons for the closure,

> > telling her those aren't the reasons, it's fair

> > enough for her to ask what you mean, isn't it?

>

> That is enough.. This thresd is about Swadesh

> closing.

>

> DF.


I take it then you'll be going back and deleting your several comments about Xoco closing, about other LL restaurant related matters not specific to Swadesh and your little divertissement with Lou about the prices at a curry house in Cardiff?


Hypocrisy thy name is Foxy.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > >

> > > Sue... Just drop it.

> >

> >

> > Why did you post about it on this thread then?

> It

> > wasn't me who brought up Xoco, nor me who

> posted

> > that it had closed, nor me who hinted as to the

> > "real reasons".

> >

> > FFS.

> >

> > If you want it dropped, maybe practice what

> you

> > preach, eh?

>

> I did not mention Xoco.. Michael Palaeologus

> did.. and I simply said it had closed..

>

> It is your very self that continues to harp on

> about why it has closed..

> and I do not know the facts of why it has

> closed.. So I have nothing further to say on the

> matter..

>

> Appology accepted in advance.

>

> Foxy.


Oh please. So tedious for those of us making the mistake of reading this thread thinking it's about the closure of Swadesh. zzzzz

That's what happens with forum threads.


They're like everyday conversation. They touch on loosely associated issues as well as the thread topic.


If it had stuck to the closure of Swadesh the thread would have come to a natural close ages ago and be way down the page of threads by now.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's what happens with forum threads.

>

> They're like everyday conversation. They touch on

> loosely associated issues as well as the thread

> topic.

>

> If it had stuck to the closure of Swadesh the

> thread would have come to a natural close ages ago

> and be way down the page of threads by now.


I don't mind threads like that. They're fine. It's the puerile bickering that gets me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...