Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> That Xoco is gone really is a shame.


I was unaware of that too. That's disappointing as it was good the one time I tried it.


excellent trip advisor rating too https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowUserReviews-g186338-d10868451-r451931662-Xoco_Bar_Grill-London_England.html

I don't think it's surprising that Xoco has gone.


It had a strange menu, strange decor and terrible music. They turned it off when we asked because we were the only people in there, but if we hadn't been, I'm not sure I could have stayed.


The food we had was OK but by no means outstanding.


I'm sorry to see such a new business fail, but I'm really not surprised.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think it's surprising that Xoco has gone.

>

> It had a strange menu, strange decor and terrible

> music. They turned it off when we asked because we

> were the only people in there, but if we hadn't

> been, I'm not sure I could have stayed.

>

> The food we had was OK but by no means

> outstanding.

>

> I'm sorry to see such a new business fail, but I'm

> really not surprised.


It would seem none of that had anything to do with why it closed..


Foxy.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't think it's surprising that Xoco has

> gone.

> >

> > It had a strange menu, strange decor and

> terrible

> > music. They turned it off when we asked because

> we

> > were the only people in there, but if we hadn't

> > been, I'm not sure I could have stayed.

> >

> > The food we had was OK but by no means

> > outstanding.

> >

> > I'm sorry to see such a new business fail, but

> I'm

> > really not surprised.

>

> It would seem none of that had anything to do with

> why it closed..

>

> Foxy.



Why did it close, then?


It had only just opened, after months of brown paper over the windows!

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> derwentgrove Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > Why did it close, then?

> >

> > It hasn't traded since the recent police raid.



>

>

> Is that actually true, or a not very funny

> "joke"?

>

> Fox, you seem to know, so why not tell us??!


It's not a joke. I was told about the raid by another restaurant owner on LL last night.

Eyes on the prize everyone please. This thread is about Swedesh. I've searched the planning portal to no avail, it does seem suspicious to me that a whole row of shops are now empty in a prime retail spot sandwiched between a cinema and a successful butchery. Does anyone have more information on this? Do Parkhill own those buildings?


Louisa.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Sue... Just drop it.



Why did you post about it on this thread then? It wasn't me who brought up Xoco, nor me who posted that it had closed, nor me who hinted as to the "real reasons".


FFS.


If you want it dropped, maybe practice what you preach, eh?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > Sue... Just drop it.

>

>

> Why did you post about it on this thread then? It

> wasn't me who brought up Xoco, nor me who posted

> that it had closed, nor me who hinted as to the

> "real reasons".

>

> FFS.

>

> If you want it dropped, maybe practice what you

> preach, eh?


I did not mention Xoco.. Michael Palaeologus did.. and I simply said it had closed..


It is your very self that continues to harp on about why it has closed..

and I do not know the facts of why it has closed.. So I have nothing further to say on the matter..


Appology accepted in advance.


Foxy.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy, if you're going to drop gnomic comments

> about Sue's assumed reasons for the closure,

> telling her those aren't the reasons, it's fair

> enough for her to ask what you mean, isn't it?


That is enough.. This thresd is about Swadesh closing.


DF.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Foxy, if you're going to drop gnomic comments

> > about Sue's assumed reasons for the closure,

> > telling her those aren't the reasons, it's fair

> > enough for her to ask what you mean, isn't it?

>

> That is enough.. This thresd is about Swadesh

> closing.

>

> DF.


I take it then you'll be going back and deleting your several comments about Xoco closing, about other LL restaurant related matters not specific to Swadesh and your little divertissement with Lou about the prices at a curry house in Cardiff?


Hypocrisy thy name is Foxy.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > >

> > > Sue... Just drop it.

> >

> >

> > Why did you post about it on this thread then?

> It

> > wasn't me who brought up Xoco, nor me who

> posted

> > that it had closed, nor me who hinted as to the

> > "real reasons".

> >

> > FFS.

> >

> > If you want it dropped, maybe practice what

> you

> > preach, eh?

>

> I did not mention Xoco.. Michael Palaeologus

> did.. and I simply said it had closed..

>

> It is your very self that continues to harp on

> about why it has closed..

> and I do not know the facts of why it has

> closed.. So I have nothing further to say on the

> matter..

>

> Appology accepted in advance.

>

> Foxy.


Oh please. So tedious for those of us making the mistake of reading this thread thinking it's about the closure of Swadesh. zzzzz

That's what happens with forum threads.


They're like everyday conversation. They touch on loosely associated issues as well as the thread topic.


If it had stuck to the closure of Swadesh the thread would have come to a natural close ages ago and be way down the page of threads by now.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's what happens with forum threads.

>

> They're like everyday conversation. They touch on

> loosely associated issues as well as the thread

> topic.

>

> If it had stuck to the closure of Swadesh the

> thread would have come to a natural close ages ago

> and be way down the page of threads by now.


I don't mind threads like that. They're fine. It's the puerile bickering that gets me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...