Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Although when I was at school it was still taught as the British Empire was a benevolent empire.


My parents didn't disagree with that either - I think it was received wisdom up to the 80s - which became entrenched to some extent. The Germans never at any stage pretended the third reich was anything other than evil after 1945(as it was self evident)

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------

> I wouldn't

> expect a German to apologise / feel guilt or "face

> up to" the actions of Hitler, because it was

> absolutely nothing to do with them),


I think German kids spend a lot of time at school even now learning about this period of history, they even have a name for the process: Vergangenheitsbew?ltigung (won't let me post Wiki link to it, so you might need to google).


That seems like a good idea, i guess South Africans had their Truth and Reconciliation commmission too.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still waiting for an eulogy for the terrorsist who

> was shot outside the Houses of Parliament

> yesterday.....


For MM the praise from political leaders in NI and the rest of the U.K. And the wider world was almost unanimous- my comments are similar - Bill Clinton may attend his funeral and the Queen with whom he met several times, has written a personal message of codolence to his family.


Quids - you are a different person from what I thought you to be and that is surprising and disappointing for our friendship

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still waiting for an eulogy for the terrorsist who

> was shot outside the Houses of Parliament

> yesterday.....



You're a twat. That's a totally unneccesary comment designed purely to make you look good and put someone else on the wrong side of an argument.


Transparent, and pathetic.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still waiting for an eulogy for the terrorsist

> who

> > was shot outside the Houses of Parliament

> > yesterday.....

>

> For MM the praise from political leaders in NI and

> the rest of the U.K. And the wider world was

> almost unanimous- my comments are similar - Bill

> Clinton may attend his funeral and the Queen with

> whom he met several times, has written a personal

> message of codolence to his family.

>

> Quids - you are a different person from what I

> thought you to be and that is surprising and

> disappointing for our friendship




Yeah because all those people are going to risk uosetting the delicate apple cart with the pesky truth. Not likely, beat kept in the past, he did the right thing in the end, blah blah blah.

For a long time he was part of the problem. Then he wasn't. He did some terrible things, for which he never expressed any regret. I don't think he should be lionised. Maybe his passing should be seen as an opportunity to put another bit of a generally shameful past behind us.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still waiting for an eulogy for the terrorsist

> who

> > was shot outside the Houses of Parliament

> > yesterday.....

>

>

> You're a twat. That's a totally unneccesary

> comment designed purely to make you look good and

> put someone else on the wrong side of an argument.

>

>

> Transparent, and pathetic.


Well it didn't make him look good in your eyes did it

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For a long time he was part of the problem. Then he wasn't. He did some terrible things, for which

> he never expressed any regret. I don't think he should be lionised.


^^ This.


Although I recognised McGuinness' crucial role in the peace deal and his bravery to actually come to the table, he has never actually repented for his crimes.


I rather wish he's left a document answering the numerous questions he has refused to answer over the last 20 years, but I somehow doubt it.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Arlene Foster is going.

>

> Yes - haha - that really is not significant.

>

> I have to say, the person who I think comes out of

> the whole MM transition with greatest respect is

> the Queen.


The Queen does have reason to hate McGuinness - Lord

Mountbatten (not the best of people himself) was a

bit of a mentor to Charles etc.


I wonder what the Queen secretly feels.

Yes - That's why I said it. Apparently they spoke about it.


And irrespective of her private feelings, it was a great gesture by her.



Martin McGuinness raised the issue of the murder of the Queen?s cousin Lord Mountbatten during their private talks last week.


The Stormont deputy First Minister revealed that he addressed the 1979 IRA murder when he met the Queen in Belfast last Wednesday.


The former IRA commander shared an historic handshake with the Queen at the city?s Lyric theatre, but their conversation took place during a private meeting at the venue.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2167473/Martin-McGuinness-reveals-spoke-Queens-murdered-cousin-private-meeting.html#ixzz4c9LXAGkC

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still waiting for an eulogy for the terrorsist

> who

> > was shot outside the Houses of Parliament

> > yesterday.....

>

> For MM the praise from political leaders in NI and

> the rest of the U.K. And the wider world was

> almost unanimous- my comments are similar - Bill

> Clinton may attend his funeral and the Queen with

> whom he met several times, has written a personal

> message of codolence to his family.

>

> Quids - you are a different person from what I

> thought you to be and that is surprising and

> disappointing for our friendship



Hi Mick, I am sorry I offended you and certainly my post looks more personally directed at you than what was meant as a general point and absolutely would have been better on another thread - probably this one - so apologies.


My general point - and one that was annoying maybe even angering me - is that the coverage between yesterday's events and Guinness eulogies in the press and the treatment of yesterday's attacker seemed very disconnected when at the end of the day they both were involved in some kind of terrorism and both targeted innocent people .

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still waiting for an eulogy for the terrorsist

> who

> > was shot outside the Houses of Parliament

> > yesterday.....

>

>

> You're a twat. That's a totally unneccesary

> comment designed purely to make you look good and

> put someone else on the wrong side of an argument.

>

>

> Transparent, and pathetic.



I genuinely couldn't give a toss what someone I don't know on an internet forum thinks about me

That's probably good; if you make a habit of comments like that you'll need to develop a thick skin.


I mean really, Mick has a sympathetic viewpoint for an IRA terrorist so you assume he will eulogise that (thankfully no longer) waste of oxygen from yesterday? Cheap shot, badly done.


Personally I think there's plenty of fault to be found with his view of McGuinness, and none of it means he has sympathy for any other cause.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ???? Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Still waiting for an eulogy for the

> terrorsist

> > who

> > > was shot outside the Houses of Parliament

> > > yesterday.....

> >

> >

> > You're a twat. That's a totally unneccesary

> > comment designed purely to make you look good

> and

> > put someone else on the wrong side of an

> argument.

> >

> >

> > Transparent, and pathetic.

>

>

> I genuinely couldn't give a toss what someone I

> don't know on an internet forum thinks about me


It shows

Red Devil wrote>>>>>

The question was asked in relation to MM's comment I extend that to all innocent victims of terrorism.

Along with the British Army, British politicians, the Royal family etc, the IRA saw the police as legitimate targets, so I wanted to know if he felt that a policemen murdered by Republican terrorists during The Troubles should be classed as an innocent victim or not...



Innocent victims of terrorism - yes. As in they themselves are not terrorists


Whether those in the organisations named above all performed their roles with the honesty and fairness that all of the public should have a right to expect in a democracy is a very different matter.


Whether those directing the members of these organisations, directed them to do illegal acts again is another matter. Whether they deliberately protected one part of the community whilst costing the lives of another part of the community is another.


State collusion in terrorist killing of catholics has been the subject of a British enquiry, been proven, and furthermore the British Government has apologised publically. Yes publically.


For example, when the British state, including the police force, army and probably MI5 colludes with British terrorists to kill a catholic solicitor then catholics rightly feel that the rule of law has broken down and feel threatened by the state.


So, as you know, you are asking a very dumb question.


"David Cameron has apologised to the family of the murdered Belfast lawyer Pat Finucane and agreed that there was state collusion between police officers and soldiers and his loyalist killers.


Launching the De Silva report into one of the most divisive murders of the Northern Ireland Troubles, the prime minister said there were "shocking levels of collusion" in the killing. Cameron told the House of Commons that the depth of the co-operation between the security forces and Finucane's loyalist killers was "unacceptable".


The prime minister admitted that the report made for "extremely difficult reading" in regard to Sir Desmond de Silva's findings, such as the revelation that 80% of the Ulster Defence Association's (terrorists) intelligence information came from official state sources."



When the state is supplying the terrorists with the state's own intelligence, the line between state and terrorist obviously becomes blurred.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> State collusion in terrorist killing of catholics

> has been the subject of a British enquiry, been

> proven, and furthermore the British Government has

> apologised publically. Yes publically.


Of course they did - some horrible dodgy stuff went on.


You only have to google FRU and Stakeknife to read up

on some of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...