Jump to content

wikileaks

Dickensman

By Dickensman
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

I'll use whatever I wish in my posts, okay? >:D<


My use of 'obsequious' was about your evident admiration (of Wiki of all things) LOL < in hopes that also annoys you ;-)



We disagree about ASSange.


Let's leave it at that.


------------------------------------

The OP


wikileaks

Posted by: DICKENSMAN December 06, 06:04PM


They are trying to bring this man down for repeating the truth?


Is this witch-hunt justified?


-----------------


Clearly you didn't really want a convo about it.

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DFTT.



In other words you cannot debate Lou?


Fine when it's all yadder yadder "I agree you agree we agree etc and yes he's anti-authoritarian so he must be the greatest".


Except ...... listen to the radio link fgs and hear first hand (late: I just did so again, what a pseud he is).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00wqfng



Edit: middle line

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hill Dweller - do you realise you're coming over

> as a bit of a tit? Just thought I'd be neigbourly

> and let you know, incase you're unaware of it.



What makes you think we're neighbours?


Or .... let me guess ..... anyone disagreeing with the established majority opinion MUST be a 'troll' and an agreer can't be a wannabe gang member ...... or can they?

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted
Yes SM, all that 'I'm a new boy around here' guff on every thread did strike me as incredibly fake. It was all just screaming 'I've been around here before but I'm trying to pretend I haven't'. (And the Wolf lives on the Hill, non?) But the thing that's soooo difficult to get rid of is tone of voice.
Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

To Dickensman

Only the post boy? Don't the people using postmen/women (or boys, if you insist) usually stamp and post and describe their intended readers-to-be?

Don't we usually regard post as private? Would you like your postman/woman to read all of yours?

Your comparisons are silly and I doubt the ass would appreciate yours of him either.


To following pair LOL

I take all that guff as typical of forum paranoia that a newie is actually a returnee.

I have had one ID on this forum, I joined about 7 days ago in that/this ID (can't be faffed to check date but daresay you have).

Is the forum admin (or are they, if plural) in the habit of banning people? A huge nother LOL if so.

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

Dickensman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning

> people, usually for disturbing the peace of the

> forum, as you will no doubt discover if you

> continue.



Jolly good, perhaps they (or you if you're being modest) will jump on those accusing others of making ad hominem attacks by doing nothing other than that themselves.

On the other hand you/they could do some thinking about OPers that expect their OPs to be agreed with (or disagreers to stay off thread).

Back to IF you are, you could educate the wannabe-MI5ers (who on other threads denounce that organ's activities) that you have access to IPAs, know that they are shown on every post, therefore know that all my posts have come from the same IPA at all times of day and night. Further on this one you could let them know whether 'Wolf' has ever functioned from that IPA and then ALSO you could let them know how very flattering they are being to 'Wolf' by letting him/her know how obsessed with him/her they are being ..... if s/he's looking in they are surely massaging his/her ego.



BIG LOL.

Act on the real point, stop behaving like a fecking paff Little Englander with your EDL-like threats.

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted

Hill Dweller Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dickensman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning

> > people, usually for disturbing the peace of the

> > forum, as you will no doubt discover if you

> > continue.

>

>

> Jolly good, perhaps they (or you if you're being

> modest) will jump on those accusing others of

> making ad hominem attacks by doing nothing other

> than that themselves.

> On the other hand you/they could do some thinking

> about OPers that expect their OPs to be agreed

> with (or disagreers to stay off thread).

> Back to IF you are, you could educate the

> wannabe-MI5ers (who on other threads denounce that

> organ's activities) that you have access to IPAs,

> know that they are shown on every post, therefore

> know that all my posts have come from the same IPA

> at all times of day and night. Further on this

> one you could let them know whether 'Wolf' has

> ever functioned from that IPA and then ALSO you

> could let them know how very flattering they are

> being to 'Wolf' by letting him/her know how

> obsessed with him/her they are being ..... if

> s/he's looking in they are surely massaging

> his/her ego.

>

>

> BIG LOL.

> Act on the real point, stop behaving like a

> fecking paff Little Englander with your EDL-like

> threats.


I think I rest my case? B) :-S

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

Given your last five posts should I take it for granted you are among the forum's 'govt' Dick?



1. Re: wikileaks

Wot's a paff? Wot's an edl type threat? Wot do I care anyway.........ranting buffoon.

Forum: The Lounge

28/12/2010 08:54

Dickensman

2. Re: wikileaks

Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning people, usually for disturbing the peace of the forum, as you will no doubt discover if you continue.

Forum: The Lounge

28/12/2010 00:16

Dickensman

3. Re: wikileaks

Apart from the American government, to the most part Assange seems to be approved of, after all he is only the postboy for someone else's missives.

Forum: The Lounge

27/12/2010 23:58

Dickensman

4. Re: petrol prices

Oh for a snipers rifle!

Forum: The Lounge

27/12/2010 23:57

Dickensman

5. Re: Predictions for 2011

Take it with you to the McCann thread queeny! Or predict something for 2011.

Forum: The Lounge

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Milan05
      suitcase for a volunteer going to Ghana

      By Milan05 · Posted

      hallo, Do you have a suitcase for a student going to Ghana to teach sports? Taking a parachute, cones, mini hurdles, batons and dodge balls and a pump, then leaving it there for the school If I could have any old suitcase please it would be amazing! Thank you
    • doo
      Looking to borrow gazebo

      By doo · Posted

      Looking to borrow a gazebo for birthday party this Saturday, can you help? Julian - 07961463111
    • Sue
      Tree Killer – Seeking Advice on Dealing with Toxic Neighbours

      By Sue · Posted

      Whilst I agree, I have been thinking about this recently in relation to some of the other posts on here about anti social behaviour. We are all products of our upbringing - our experiences at home, school and beyond - plus whatever we have inherited genetically which might affect our behaviour (the nature/nurture thing). So in this case, if people haven't been brought up to love and appreciate trees and other wild things, plus as you say they may be deeply unhappy (or have other undiagnosed issues) it's easy to see how they could have ended up doing this. Also, it's possible they had quite low intelligence and didn't really grasp what they were doing and the effect it would have on so many other people. But that's just surmise and possibly completely wrong. From what I've read about it, they seemed to be two mates egging each other on, like two big kids. I'm not for a minute excusing what they did, and it's right they should be punished, but I really hope they might get some sort of rehabilitation in prison (it would  be appropriate to have them do some kind of community service like planting saplings, wouldn't it, or working in woodland conservation). And the same goes for phone robbers and shoplifters (rehabilitation, not planting saplings), though for SOME  shoplifters there might also be other issues at play, not excluding poverty. Sorry Jasonlondon,  I've gone off at a real tangent here, lucky it's in the lounge! Oh oops I've just noticed it isn't. Sorry admin. Oh, and then there's a whole philosophical discussion to be had about free will and determinism ..... 🤣🤣🤣
    • Sue
      78 and 363 bus stops

      By Sue · Posted

      Thanks! I'll find out in a few weeks when I get the results! It was one of those disconcerting things where a disembodied voice keeps booming  at you to breathe in and hold it, then breathe normally. Apart from that it was OK, all completely painless. I imagine there will be quite a few people going from ED, though I presume it covers the whole Southwark area 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...