wikileaks

[Hill Dweller]

I'll use whatever I wish in my posts, okay? >:D<

My use of 'obsequious' was about your evident admiration (of Wiki of all things) LOL < in hopes that also annoys you ;-)

We disagree about ASSange.

Let's leave it at that.

------------------------------------

The OP

wikileaks

Posted by: DICKENSMAN December 06, 06:04PM

They are trying to bring this man down for repeating the truth?

Is this witch-hunt justified?

-----------------

Clearly you didn't really want a convo about it.

[BrandNewGuy]

So that's Wikileaks consigned to the bin. Great. I wonder what's on telly...?

[Hill Dweller]

What wimpy behaviour BNG :-)

20/12/2010 21:03 BrandNewGuy

27/12/2010 15:41 BrandNewGuy

Been away for a few days?

Sorry about your inability to accord others the respect you must have for your own opinions.

[louisiana]

DFTT.

[ImpetuousVrouw]

Hill Dweller - do you realise you're coming over as a bit of a tit? Just thought I'd be neigbourly and let you know, incase you're unaware of it.

[Hill Dweller]

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DFTT.

In other words you cannot debate Lou?

Fine when it's all yadder yadder "I agree you agree we agree etc and yes he's anti-authoritarian so he must be the greatest".

Except ...... listen to the radio link fgs and hear first hand (late: I just did so again, what a pseud he is).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00wqfng

Edit: middle line

[Hill Dweller]

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hill Dweller - do you realise you're coming over

> as a bit of a tit? Just thought I'd be neigbourly

> and let you know, incase you're unaware of it.

What makes you think we're neighbours?

Or .... let me guess ..... anyone disagreeing with the established majority opinion MUST be a 'troll' and an agreer can't be a wannabe gang member ...... or can they?

[ImpetuousVrouw]

"East Dulwich" Forum?

[Hill Dweller]

Ah, there's a pre-requisite to joining ?

I mean of course a pre-requisite that's in addition to the one of approving of ASSange.

[Dickensman]

Apart from the American government, to the most part Assange seems to be approved of, after all he is only the postboy

for someone else's missives.

[SeanMacGabhann]

Hill dweller

Wolf

Do the math...s

[louisiana]

Yes SM, all that 'I'm a new boy around here' guff on every thread did strike me as incredibly fake. It was all just screaming 'I've been around here before but I'm trying to pretend I haven't'. (And the Wolf lives on the Hill, non?) But the thing that's soooo difficult to get rid of is tone of voice.

[Hill Dweller]

To Dickensman

Only the post boy? Don't the people using postmen/women (or boys, if you insist) usually stamp and post and describe their intended readers-to-be?

Don't we usually regard post as private? Would you like your postman/woman to read all of yours?

Your comparisons are silly and I doubt the ass would appreciate yours of him either.

To following pair LOL

I take all that guff as typical of forum paranoia that a newie is actually a returnee.

I have had one ID on this forum, I joined about 7 days ago in that/this ID (can't be faffed to check date but daresay you have).

Is the forum admin (or are they, if plural) in the habit of banning people? A huge nother LOL if so.

[Dickensman]

Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning people, usually for disturbing the peace of the forum, as you will no doubt discover if you continue.

[SeanMacGabhann]

Ahhh...very good. BBC an all that. Gotcha

[Hill Dweller]

Dickensman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning

> people, usually for disturbing the peace of the

> forum, as you will no doubt discover if you

> continue.

Jolly good, perhaps they (or you if you're being modest) will jump on those accusing others of making ad hominem attacks by doing nothing other than that themselves.

On the other hand you/they could do some thinking about OPers that expect their OPs to be agreed with (or disagreers to stay off thread).

Back to IF you are, you could educate the wannabe-MI5ers (who on other threads denounce that organ's activities) that you have access to IPAs, know that they are shown on every post, therefore know that all my posts have come from the same IPA at all times of day and night. Further on this one you could let them know whether 'Wolf' has ever functioned from that IPA and then ALSO you could let them know how very flattering they are being to 'Wolf' by letting him/her know how obsessed with him/her they are being ..... if s/he's looking in they are surely massaging his/her ego.

BIG LOL.

Act on the real point, stop behaving like a fecking paff Little Englander with your EDL-like threats.

[louisiana]

Hill Dweller Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dickensman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning

> > people, usually for disturbing the peace of the

> > forum, as you will no doubt discover if you

> > continue.

>

>

> Jolly good, perhaps they (or you if you're being

> modest) will jump on those accusing others of

> making ad hominem attacks by doing nothing other

> than that themselves.

> On the other hand you/they could do some thinking

> about OPers that expect their OPs to be agreed

> with (or disagreers to stay off thread).

> Back to IF you are, you could educate the

> wannabe-MI5ers (who on other threads denounce that

> organ's activities) that you have access to IPAs,

> know that they are shown on every post, therefore

> know that all my posts have come from the same IPA

> at all times of day and night. Further on this

> one you could let them know whether 'Wolf' has

> ever functioned from that IPA and then ALSO you

> could let them know how very flattering they are

> being to 'Wolf' by letting him/her know how

> obsessed with him/her they are being ..... if

> s/he's looking in they are surely massaging

> his/her ego.

>

>

> BIG LOL.

> Act on the real point, stop behaving like a

> fecking paff Little Englander with your EDL-like

> threats.

I think I rest my case? B) :-S

[Hill Dweller]

There's a good little Lou.

Say nothing except to express the toadying.

Care to advise who the mod/s are here?

It does seem the appropriate thread on which to ask :)

[Dickensman]

Wot's a paff?

Wot's an edl type threat?

Wot do I care anyway.........ranting buffoon.

[Hill Dweller]

paff = pathetic

EDL stands for English Defence League aka NF/BNP etcetcetc TYPE

[Hill Dweller]

Given your last five posts should I take it for granted you are among the forum's 'govt' Dick?

1. Re: wikileaks

Wot's a paff? Wot's an edl type threat? Wot do I care anyway.........ranting buffoon.

Forum: The Lounge

28/12/2010 08:54

Dickensman

2. Re: wikileaks

Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning people, usually for disturbing the peace of the forum, as you will no doubt discover if you continue.

Forum: The Lounge

28/12/2010 00:16

Dickensman

3. Re: wikileaks

Apart from the American government, to the most part Assange seems to be approved of, after all he is only the postboy for someone else's missives.

Forum: The Lounge

27/12/2010 23:58

Dickensman

4. Re: petrol prices

Oh for a snipers rifle!

Forum: The Lounge

27/12/2010 23:57

Dickensman

5. Re: Predictions for 2011

Take it with you to the McCann thread queeny! Or predict something for 2011.

Forum: The Lounge

[Dickensman]

Your talent for ranting reminds me of old wolfy.

Sorry to disappoint, I am not a 'govt' dick.

[Hill Dweller]

So enjoy your evening dick, whatever it might involve (other than bossing all and sundry) :-S

[Hill Dweller]

Still hoping for a reply to this post Lou :

Re: wikileaks

Posted by: Hill Dweller December 22, 12:39PM

especially given what I've subsequently read of your professional status (or the tactics of those you translate for).

[louisiana]

Hill Dweller, you are not nearly amusing enough to be a wag.

You are sadly merely a f-w drone. Stale.

Right, where's my Crabbies...