Jump to content

wikileaks

Dickensman

By Dickensman
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

I'll use whatever I wish in my posts, okay? >:D<


My use of 'obsequious' was about your evident admiration (of Wiki of all things) LOL < in hopes that also annoys you ;-)



We disagree about ASSange.


Let's leave it at that.


------------------------------------

The OP


wikileaks

Posted by: DICKENSMAN December 06, 06:04PM


They are trying to bring this man down for repeating the truth?


Is this witch-hunt justified?


-----------------


Clearly you didn't really want a convo about it.

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DFTT.



In other words you cannot debate Lou?


Fine when it's all yadder yadder "I agree you agree we agree etc and yes he's anti-authoritarian so he must be the greatest".


Except ...... listen to the radio link fgs and hear first hand (late: I just did so again, what a pseud he is).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00wqfng



Edit: middle line

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hill Dweller - do you realise you're coming over

> as a bit of a tit? Just thought I'd be neigbourly

> and let you know, incase you're unaware of it.



What makes you think we're neighbours?


Or .... let me guess ..... anyone disagreeing with the established majority opinion MUST be a 'troll' and an agreer can't be a wannabe gang member ...... or can they?

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted
Yes SM, all that 'I'm a new boy around here' guff on every thread did strike me as incredibly fake. It was all just screaming 'I've been around here before but I'm trying to pretend I haven't'. (And the Wolf lives on the Hill, non?) But the thing that's soooo difficult to get rid of is tone of voice.
Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

To Dickensman

Only the post boy? Don't the people using postmen/women (or boys, if you insist) usually stamp and post and describe their intended readers-to-be?

Don't we usually regard post as private? Would you like your postman/woman to read all of yours?

Your comparisons are silly and I doubt the ass would appreciate yours of him either.


To following pair LOL

I take all that guff as typical of forum paranoia that a newie is actually a returnee.

I have had one ID on this forum, I joined about 7 days ago in that/this ID (can't be faffed to check date but daresay you have).

Is the forum admin (or are they, if plural) in the habit of banning people? A huge nother LOL if so.

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

Dickensman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning

> people, usually for disturbing the peace of the

> forum, as you will no doubt discover if you

> continue.



Jolly good, perhaps they (or you if you're being modest) will jump on those accusing others of making ad hominem attacks by doing nothing other than that themselves.

On the other hand you/they could do some thinking about OPers that expect their OPs to be agreed with (or disagreers to stay off thread).

Back to IF you are, you could educate the wannabe-MI5ers (who on other threads denounce that organ's activities) that you have access to IPAs, know that they are shown on every post, therefore know that all my posts have come from the same IPA at all times of day and night. Further on this one you could let them know whether 'Wolf' has ever functioned from that IPA and then ALSO you could let them know how very flattering they are being to 'Wolf' by letting him/her know how obsessed with him/her they are being ..... if s/he's looking in they are surely massaging his/her ego.



BIG LOL.

Act on the real point, stop behaving like a fecking paff Little Englander with your EDL-like threats.

louisiana

louisiana

Posted
Posted

Hill Dweller Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dickensman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning

> > people, usually for disturbing the peace of the

> > forum, as you will no doubt discover if you

> > continue.

>

>

> Jolly good, perhaps they (or you if you're being

> modest) will jump on those accusing others of

> making ad hominem attacks by doing nothing other

> than that themselves.

> On the other hand you/they could do some thinking

> about OPers that expect their OPs to be agreed

> with (or disagreers to stay off thread).

> Back to IF you are, you could educate the

> wannabe-MI5ers (who on other threads denounce that

> organ's activities) that you have access to IPAs,

> know that they are shown on every post, therefore

> know that all my posts have come from the same IPA

> at all times of day and night. Further on this

> one you could let them know whether 'Wolf' has

> ever functioned from that IPA and then ALSO you

> could let them know how very flattering they are

> being to 'Wolf' by letting him/her know how

> obsessed with him/her they are being ..... if

> s/he's looking in they are surely massaging

> his/her ego.

>

>

> BIG LOL.

> Act on the real point, stop behaving like a

> fecking paff Little Englander with your EDL-like

> threats.


I think I rest my case? B) :-S

Hill Dweller

Hill Dweller

Posted
Posted

Given your last five posts should I take it for granted you are among the forum's 'govt' Dick?



1. Re: wikileaks

Wot's a paff? Wot's an edl type threat? Wot do I care anyway.........ranting buffoon.

Forum: The Lounge

28/12/2010 08:54

Dickensman

2. Re: wikileaks

Admin certainly are in the 'habit' of banning people, usually for disturbing the peace of the forum, as you will no doubt discover if you continue.

Forum: The Lounge

28/12/2010 00:16

Dickensman

3. Re: wikileaks

Apart from the American government, to the most part Assange seems to be approved of, after all he is only the postboy for someone else's missives.

Forum: The Lounge

27/12/2010 23:58

Dickensman

4. Re: petrol prices

Oh for a snipers rifle!

Forum: The Lounge

27/12/2010 23:57

Dickensman

5. Re: Predictions for 2011

Take it with you to the McCann thread queeny! Or predict something for 2011.

Forum: The Lounge

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • malumbu
      BAD ADVICE FROM HOLLAND & BARRETT

      By malumbu · Posted

      I've found it quite a useful thread.  Apparently protein powders are toxic. Not that I have ever, or will ever, try them.   https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/the-hidden-dangers-of-protein-powders
    • beansprout
      What helps you keep on top of your home?

      By beansprout · Posted

      Personally can’t stand carpets however where I am renting has carpet in  bedroom and hall. Not great quality and certainly not cleaned. Was  in B & M recently and looking at carpet shampoo -wow got a can costing £2.99 to test.. No scrubbing as others seemed to imply. Spray, leave and poof - smells great, no dabbing or scrubbing and c leaving rubbish. First to admit is only temp solution but no need to hire carpet cleaner instantly  or pay for a company to come and deal with professionally. For 3/6 months happy to have used this - Have a carpet cleaner and in a month or so plan to use it.    Buy a steam cleaner for floors - not expensive - much better than mop and bucket and more hygienic all round. Can pick up second hand ones on e bay.
    • SeaHibiscus
      BAD ADVICE FROM HOLLAND & BARRETT

      By SeaHibiscus · Posted

      Is this a true story? What protein powder causes kidney damage? Why didn't you cite an article? I shop at H&B, mostly to buy their castor oil, however, I would recommend researching any product beforehand. They do have very informative articles on their website. To be honest, I don't see the point of this post. You could have just taken the product back for a refund or complained in store and in writing.
    • beansprout
      Love Dulwich rebranding as Turkish Restaurant

      By beansprout · Posted

      Well the Italian on Lordship Lane  recommended here was delicious.  Thank you so very much -my party were extremely pleased with ambience, location and lovely food plus puddings to die for. They are also on Deliveroo.  Will certainly be back when I am back in 6 weeks time. Went past Love Dulwich at lunchtime on my way to Italian - only a party of 2 - food might be excellent but decided to give it a miss - wasn’t impressed with manager who admitted he had only been there 2 weeks. Might be being totally unfair but doubt it, as no comments since about a month ago from Pugwash.  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...