Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As was told off by Admin (Sorry!) I have stared this thread...


Vik Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cute indeed but i'm going to have to bite my lip

> over the whole 'animals for sale' thing.sad smiley


Yes, very cute, but why "bite your lip" over selling them? I'm confuddled by that?


E (Being told by his wife to buy one!)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1473-selling-animals/
Share on other sites

Apologies for the confuddlement (Oooh what a good word!) E!


I don't agree with breeding animals for money, even if the dog got pregnant 'by accident' there are plenty of animal charities that will help to find suitible homes for the pups and then neuter the dog to stop it happening again, i'm really against using animals for financial gain.


*Steps off of soap box;-)*

Whoever sells the puppies will have to spend a fair bit of money and time caring for them before they're old enough to head on to a good home. Which is obviously a better solution for all concerned than a sack and a river. One way of looking at it could be that the buyer is part-funding this process. After all, you have to pay to get a puppy (or kitten) from Battersea or similar places for much the same reason.


(And Battersea do a great job, btw. Highly recommended to anyone looking for a pet.)

I don't agree with using animals to produce as many pups as possible for you to sell, I think that is bad. But don't have a problem with people selling pups if they find themselves with a litter they can't handle.


I always remember an Irish friend of mine telling me his mum wouldn't have the cat sorted at the vets because of her catholicism, so instead she'd be down the river with a bag on a regular basis... Now which is more "christian"? I think I'd rather those animals had been sold for a few quid.

> his mum wouldn't have the cat sorted at the vets because of her catholicism..


WHAT?!?!?! That's bonkers?

I'm no expert on the catechisms, but I'm sure the whole contraception thing doesn't extend to cats. And if it does, like you say, whatever happened to though shan't drown things in sacks with bricks in?

Bizarre. To the best of my knowledge the catholic church has no standpoint on neutering animals. Are you sure she wasn?t just a nutter?


The only problem I have with people selectively breeding dogs is that mutts then get born by accident and don?t get decent homes because everyone wants some kind of pure bred dog as a fashion accessory or status symbol.


In my experience mutts are generally healthier, more intelligent and make better pets. It?s something called hybrid vigor. Although I must declare my bias here as all the dogs I?ve ever had have been unwanted mongrels that I have taken in. They have all been great pets though.

Vik Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apologies for the confuddlement (Oooh what a good

> word!) E!

Go, use it, give it life!



> I don't agree with breeding animals for money.

Taking the totally opposite stance then surely that brings our whole food system into question. (Perhaps the veggie argument ?) Or do you just mean pets? .



> even if the dog got pregnant 'by accident' there

> are plenty of animal charities that will help to

> find suitible homes for the pups and then neuter

> the dog to stop it happening again, i'm really

> against using animals for financial gain.

Is that approach not simply putting more burdon on said charities? I guess you're talking about breeders, as opposed to people who find themselves up to their ankles in Puppy poo, and trying to sell them on?.


> *Steps off of soap box;-)*

CAREFUL! It's a high one! ;-)


Not tying to argue, just questioning, that's how you understand other people's POV.

Oh Keef darling, I forgive you - it is simply that I hate to feel exposed. My mother really is clinically insane you know! I have started a group called "Recovering Roman Catholics" on facebook, but she does not yet recognise she has a problem - and so she is unwilling to engage with it. What more can I do? I have even confiscated her cat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Considering the private revision study that my children undertook, perhaps 15 to 20 years ago in that library it seems a shame they have timed the refurbishment so it won't be open at this crucial time for children. But hey, so long as it's greener... 
    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...