Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We're preparing the contract for our new nanny, using the nannytax standard contract. What percentage of a nanny's pay do you pay (or is fair to pay) a nanny when you go on holiday (without her)? We don't travel much but there may be a week here and a few days there when we won't need her. Is anything below 100% pay being cheap? I don't want to be cheap. I just want to know what's common practice :)

I always agreed a certain number of days/weeks paid holiday a year. The deal was that we could chooser when to take half and she could choose when to take the other half, although in practise we agreed the big ones at the beginning of the year and all took them at the same time.


If I then took other odd days off that exceeded the agreed leave, I paid in full on the grounds its not their fault I have decided to have more time off, and they have their bills to pay.

Yes that's what we do too. In practice we've ended up taking quite a bit of extra holiday, and have always paid it 100% in full...as mellors says it's not their choosing. My nanny asked for an extra week off when we were around but had family to stay and for that we agreed that she would work those days off in extra time/babysitting.

You should always pay your nanny in full when you choose to take extra holidays, it is your choosing not your nanny's.

In my previous job I used offically get 5 weeks paid leave but in reality it was more like 8 therefore I didn't really feel I could complain if my employers asked me to come in for one or two mornings/afternoons to do any nursery duties that I may not get time to do during my normal working routine - sorting through clothes, toys, books that the children have outgrown or sewing labels into school uniforms etc.

you have to pay 100%. If you are employing a nanny, you pay for 52 weeks a year, just like any employer. you have some freedom over how many holiday days you offer in total, since you can include bank holidays in the total (though many people don't, or only in part.)


For a full time employee, the legal minimum is 5.6 weeks (28 days), though this can include bank holidays.


see here for calculations on part time:

http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/layer?topicId=1079427399

nylonmeals Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you sure that the legal minimum is 28 days for

> full time employee? That was more than I got at

> work when I was full-time.


I believe that is 4 weeks + 8 public holidays

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...