Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> :)) you don't have any need to know about 1960s UK

> politicians. The only Irish politician I know now

> are the two Brians memorably described as the pair

> of useless gobshites on RTE News last week


What you don't know Quids is that's a term of affection. I once called someone on here a gobshite and.............oh I remember now, he sent me a threatening PM. Misunderstanding.

To get back to the Euro..........


The Germans railroaded everyone at breakneck speed into something which would have been better done slowly and carefully.

I felt that the Euro should have become an additional currency,


running alongside the individual currencies,


which would then give the originals room to fluctuate,


rather than everyone dropping their own legal tender.


After a few years the individual currencies would have naturally phased out and left a more stable Eurocoin to use on the international market.


The Germans were most responsible for the 'big hurry' in moulding countries into a europe controlled predominantly by Germany.


Now its all going wrong Germany wants to drop the euro and return the mark, as it would most benefit Germany, so much for we're all in it together.

The reason De gaulle didn't want Britain in was he feared that Britain would be used as a Trojan horse for American produce, which on the farming front would have stuffed France with all their little farmers costing far more to produce a ton of wheat than the Americans.

Well America and the trading relationship with the Commonwealth which was a lot stronger and more important to Britain back then. But he also cited the fact that constitutionally Britain is quite unique and different to the other states who were members at the time. As an example, while both are perfectly functional, European Law works quite differently from English Law and trying to run the two together can be difficult.


The fact is that De Gaulle?s reasons for rejecting Britain were pretty much the same as the reasons jingoistic British Euro-sceptics give for wanting out today. But they won?t have it from a Frenchy. Which makes it a wonderful thing to say to expose their true sentiments.


Also calling Quids a jingoistic Euro-sceptic is quite fun. Even if it isn?t really true.

  • 3 months later...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?It won?t work, you can?t marry up sovereign

> states with different political, economic and, er,

> cough ?accounting practices' together under one

> set of monetary rules.?

>

> ?The differences in economic cycles between

> various states means a one size fits all interest

> rate policy is extremely economically risky?

>

> ?Ultimately, it will mean the loss of sovereignty

> for most of its members and Germany ruling the

> roost?

>

> And so it came to pass. Next time will ?liberal?

> idealsists and worthy politicians please join in

> an actual debate rather than insult those who pose

> legitimate questions as ?little englanders?, or

> ?europhobes? etc etc?

>

> I doubt it, as ?liberal? idealists? ideas don?t

> tend to win arguments under scrutiny so smear,

> lies and demonisation are their normal tactic

> against those that dare even question their

> ?progressive? certainty.

>

>

> Discuss



Actually, this one is better come on Huge...do your best.


Incidentally, I get paid in Euros so this isn't personally great for me before accusations of Crowing start ;-)

I'm not sure what you're getting at Quids?


This comment is clearly erroneous: ?It won?t work, you can?t marry up sovereign states with different political, economic and, er, cough ?accounting practices' together under one set of monetary rules.?


You only need a daytrip from Kensington to Liverpool to see two two nations with different political, economic and accounting practices working together under one set of monetary rules.


I don't doubt that consistent interest rate policies are inherently risky. I just see no point in attemtping to make this a European 'national' issue. Perhaps a visit to Ripon from Henley would clear that one up? Since the challenges are as big within our borders as without, then it's a non-issue so far as European integration goes.


I don't know whether convergence means a loss of 'sovereignty', because I don't know what 'sovereignty' is. Since we are economically and structurally entirely dependent upon world trade, I argue that we have no 'sovereignty' that's worth anything more than the bleating of the Sun.


I can't see a reason to distinguish someone I don't know in Leeds from someone I don't know in Lisbon. The only distinction you could possibly draw would be completely arbitrary and constructed upon 500 year old social engineering, language and lines on maps.


Since this form of distinction is based on irrational and arbitrary prejudice, then the 'little englander' sobriquet is applied with complete accuracy. Not a smear or lie in sight.

The pound is worth about 1.15 euros at the moment. It has been hovering around this mark for about 2 1/2 years now give or take 5c despite all the shenanigans. Where will it be this time next year? (I am currently paid in GBP but am soon to be moing over to euros). If the pound strengthens significantly aginst the euro then i'm sunk.

A weak pound makes exports disproportionately cheap, and imports unhealthily expensive.


Whilst it offers a short term boost to national industry, it's only short term because they have to buy the resources in. At the moment they're still trading on pre-collapse medium-term reserve contracts.


At some stage in the next 12 months the pound will need to strengthen, and that'll be achieved through raising interest rates. If you're planning to negotiate on current exchange rates I'd probably tend to delay, on the grounds that the pound is unlikely to get weaker, but quite likely to get stronger. A no-lose gamble.


Having said that, it's entirely a personal conviction and I don't want to be held responsible if it doesn't work out.

Re Quids comment:

"Yup and thank Ed Balls too. That's when he was still being a highly competent and effective chancellor...then he lost it in hubris and hype."


Point of information - Mr Balls has never been Chancellor. It was Alastair Darling. Balls was his Chief Secretary.

Anyway, one day, we may get The Federation a la Star Trek, given that notherners still moan about 'London' taking/wasting etc all the time then imagine what the good Burgers of Lisbon and Dublin will have to say about Frankfurt in the coming years. Reality and idealism Huge...you know I'm with you on romantic idealism, but then I step into the real world.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...