Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nice one Keano77, although of course they do not need to be handed a veto: they already, as a member of the 27, have one. The game theoretic reality is that this is 1 to 27: in this sense the EU does not exist in this negotiation. So what do we think the countries with large populations over here doing their excellent work will be insisting upon?


Meanwhile, in fantasy land, I am greatly looking forward to our now imminent war with Spain (such a nice homology with The Falklands) - (irony emoticon - I fear this needs emphasis these days). I see on the BBC "have your say" website that Brexiters are arguing for this. We think we are a great imperial power, so we must keep strategic access to the Med and defend 'our' people. So lets see what some exocets will do to change the Spanish mind. I suspect the good people of Gibralter may have other ideas given how they voted in the referendum, as may the people of Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and er ... London.


It has all unravelled so fast: I wonder if the Brexit camp can face this. I doubt it. They will just get more strident and stupid.

I listened to R4 today, and Ian Duncan Smith was on there.


Did he say "52,000 separate pieces of legislation to go through" in 2 years?


He said something to the effect of "If we don't get distracted and we're disciplined, we can do it"


Now in my very simple maths, that's 500 laws a week to transpose, before the deadline. And there's the minor point of a country to run.




*plays Chariots of Fire sound track*

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I listened to R4 today, and Ian Duncan Smith was

> on there.

>

> Did he say "52,000 separate pieces of legislation

> to go through" in 2 years?

>

> He said something to the effect of "If we don't

> get distracted and we're disciplined, we can do

> it"

>

> Now in my very simple maths, that's 500 laws a

> week to transpose, before the deadline. And

> there's the minor point of a country to run.

>

>

>

> *plays Chariots of Fire sound track*



Also known as "if it doesn't happen then it's everyone else's fault for not letting us do what we want when we want."

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The posturing is shaping up for an ugly fight with

> the EU handing Spain a veto on Gibraltar.

>

> I suggest we use some of the ?58.7 Billion we pay

> the EU each second to fund the separatist

> Catalans, Basques and Breton nationalists to sow

> discord. That'll learn 'em


We could also support a united Ireland.


Brittany is one of the poorest regions in a major economies in Europe and does very well out of the EU. Why would they want to leave? You wouldn't expect Cornwall and Wales to do similar would you now?


Anyway there are already communites just counting down the days before they leave in at least two of those regions - the British expats. At least Gibraltar new which side their bread was buttered.

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu, Wales voted for Brexit.

>

> God knows why.


I think malumbu was going for some sort of irony.


But, if that wasn't the case, so did Cornwall. And then they was shocked to find Brexit means they have lost ?60m worth of annual EU finding.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We could also support a united Ireland.


this has now become a mainstream possibility: see the reviews in the FT today. Dublin has (after a taboo of 15 years or so) begun to talk about it explicitly. It may be this or a wall (hard brexit would demand one).


should we not now try to support a united London? The M25 is not a bad sketch for a wall.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway nice to see the good old EU using

> Gibraltans as bargaining chips - where's the

> outrage EDF or are we inconsistent and

> hypocritical in our hate on this sort of

> disgusting behaviour - moral high ground lost EU

> (not a surprise given their form/integrity though)


hate? disgusting?


now there was I thinking the UK had triggered a divorce that the other party did not want at all. One based on stupidity: xenophobia, a misunderstanding of the nature of trade, an atavistic fear of immigration not to mention the culture of the other. A paradigmatic expression of ressentiment of cosmopolitanism, liberal values, and a modern understanding of the way the economy works.


So yes, I guess your words express ressentiment with some precision.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway nice to see the good old EU using

> Gibraltans as bargaining chips - where's the

> outrage EDF or are we inconsistent and

> hypocritical in our hate on this sort of

> disgusting behaviour - moral high ground lost EU

> (not a surprise given their form/integrity though)


Gibraltar itself itself is not on the table, just the border with Spain, no? And considering Spain has been a law unto itself as far as the Gibraltan border is concerned even whilst Britain has been in the EU, surely this is just business as usual anyway?

To give you the benefit of doubt Loz, I can with a rational hat on, see why the EU might be wise not to take sides in an international dispute over sovereignty.


But don't forget what we're dealing with here - a body that ordered the plunder of People's bank accounts in Cyprus.


Say no more

-----------------------------------

> -----

> > We could also support a united Ireland.

>

> this has now become a mainstream possibility: see

> the reviews in the FT today. Dublin has (after a

> taboo of 15 years or so) begun to talk about it

> explicitly. It may be this or a wall (hard brexit

> would demand one).

>

> should we not now try to support a united London?

> The M25 is not a bad sketch for a wall.


London outer boroughs would be outside of this but we could have an extenstion to Brighton, in the way that East Berlin was connected to West Germany.


The outer Boroughs would be happy - Bromley would be in Kent again, Dagenham in Essex, and Middlesex be more that a postal address.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To give you the benefit of doubt Loz, I can with a rational hat on, see why the EU might be wise no

> to take sides in an international dispute over sovereignty.

>

> But don't forget what we're dealing with here - a body that ordered the plunder of People's bank

> accounts in Cyprus.

>

> Say no more


Well, I certainly didn't that little tangent coming...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its good to hear concern for this amazing resource. If you ever visit you will find it full of Dulwich teenagers upstairs studying for exams, community is so vital for that generation. I am sure we dont want that to evaporate entirely. There is not much left. With all knowledge of the huge wealth that exists in the area, it would be so warm and rewarding for some of that to be passed to Dulwich library. The ground floor loos were returning to a state of nature itself. Moss was starting to grow.   X
    • The planned closure of Dulwich Library for over 6 months to refurb and change the heating seems odd. The description of works does not seems to align with the expected length of closure.  Some library authorities use shop fitters over December/January when they have no other work to undertake such library refurbs. The costs are especially keen as a result. And shop fitters are used to compressed time works. Win win.  I would hope the works involve using the vacant unused second floor. Perhaps relocating the first floor librarian back offices there to make a bigger user space on the first floor.
    • The consultation advertised as being last night Tuesday 18th, and to which our Councillor Renata Hamvas told me she was unable to attend, never happened because Events Team and Gala never showed up at Pod 1 Peckham Library. Cllr Hamvas is not supporting the 2nd weekend.  I then noticed in Southwark News the meeting is scheduled for tonight Wednesday 19th Nov 2025.  I can't attend. CllrVictoria Mills doesn't reply to my emails. Anyone able to go? I am unable to leave the house at this time. 
    • Just received this email: You’re receiving this email because you signed the petition: “Limit the sale of fireworks to those running local council approved events only”. The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “Limit the sale of fireworks to those running local council approved events only”. Government responded: The Government recognises the negative impact fireworks can have on some people and animals. However, when used responsibly they are a source of enjoyment for many people. The Government’s intention is to minimise the negative impact of fireworks and to support their considerate use, while reducing the risks and disturbances to individuals, animals, and property. The majority of individuals who use fireworks do so in a responsible and safe manner and there are enforcement mechanisms in place to tackle situations when fireworks are misused. At this point in time the Government does not have any plans to ban the sale of fireworks to consumers. We have launched a fireworks campaign for this fireworks season to provide guidance on minimising the impacts of fireworks on animal welfare and encouraging responsible use. Lower noise fireworks are promoted in the campaign alongside encouraging people to consider going to a public display. Public displays are more likely to be well-publicised, providing people with an opportunity to prepare ahead of the display taking place. The campaign also includes new guidance for those running community fireworks events, and social media posts that emphasise the risks from the misuse of fireworks. This supplements existing guidance from Government and other organisations that is available to help people to use fireworks safely and appropriately. My safety: fireworks - GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/my-safety-fireworks) Organising non-professional fireworks displays - GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/organising-non-professional-fireworks-displays) A regulatory framework currently controls the sale, availability, and use of fireworks to consumers. For example, there is an 11pm curfew in place for the use of fireworks, with later exceptions only for the traditional firework periods of November 5th, Diwali, New Year’s Eve and the Chinese New Year. Using fireworks outside the curfew hours is a criminal offence enforced by the police and can lead to imprisonment and a substantial fine. There is also a maximum noise level of 120 decibels with many retailers also offering ‘lower noise’ and ‘no bang’ fireworks. A number of animal welfare organisations, along with industry and local authorities, provide advice and guidance to enable people to minimise the negative impacts of fireworks on people, animals and our communities. We work closely with these organisations to amplify this messaging in the run up to, and during, key dates when fireworks are commonly used.  To inform any future action the Government will continue to engage with businesses, consumer groups and charities to gather evidence on the issues with and impacts of fireworks. Department for Business and Trade Click this link to view the response online: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/732559?reveal_response=yes This petition has over 100,000 signatures. The Petitions Committee will consider it for a debate. They can also gather further evidence and press the government for action. The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee Thanks, The Petitions Team House of Commons
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...