Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nice one Keano77, although of course they do not need to be handed a veto: they already, as a member of the 27, have one. The game theoretic reality is that this is 1 to 27: in this sense the EU does not exist in this negotiation. So what do we think the countries with large populations over here doing their excellent work will be insisting upon?


Meanwhile, in fantasy land, I am greatly looking forward to our now imminent war with Spain (such a nice homology with The Falklands) - (irony emoticon - I fear this needs emphasis these days). I see on the BBC "have your say" website that Brexiters are arguing for this. We think we are a great imperial power, so we must keep strategic access to the Med and defend 'our' people. So lets see what some exocets will do to change the Spanish mind. I suspect the good people of Gibralter may have other ideas given how they voted in the referendum, as may the people of Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and er ... London.


It has all unravelled so fast: I wonder if the Brexit camp can face this. I doubt it. They will just get more strident and stupid.

I listened to R4 today, and Ian Duncan Smith was on there.


Did he say "52,000 separate pieces of legislation to go through" in 2 years?


He said something to the effect of "If we don't get distracted and we're disciplined, we can do it"


Now in my very simple maths, that's 500 laws a week to transpose, before the deadline. And there's the minor point of a country to run.




*plays Chariots of Fire sound track*

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I listened to R4 today, and Ian Duncan Smith was

> on there.

>

> Did he say "52,000 separate pieces of legislation

> to go through" in 2 years?

>

> He said something to the effect of "If we don't

> get distracted and we're disciplined, we can do

> it"

>

> Now in my very simple maths, that's 500 laws a

> week to transpose, before the deadline. And

> there's the minor point of a country to run.

>

>

>

> *plays Chariots of Fire sound track*



Also known as "if it doesn't happen then it's everyone else's fault for not letting us do what we want when we want."

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The posturing is shaping up for an ugly fight with

> the EU handing Spain a veto on Gibraltar.

>

> I suggest we use some of the ?58.7 Billion we pay

> the EU each second to fund the separatist

> Catalans, Basques and Breton nationalists to sow

> discord. That'll learn 'em


We could also support a united Ireland.


Brittany is one of the poorest regions in a major economies in Europe and does very well out of the EU. Why would they want to leave? You wouldn't expect Cornwall and Wales to do similar would you now?


Anyway there are already communites just counting down the days before they leave in at least two of those regions - the British expats. At least Gibraltar new which side their bread was buttered.

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu, Wales voted for Brexit.

>

> God knows why.


I think malumbu was going for some sort of irony.


But, if that wasn't the case, so did Cornwall. And then they was shocked to find Brexit means they have lost ?60m worth of annual EU finding.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We could also support a united Ireland.


this has now become a mainstream possibility: see the reviews in the FT today. Dublin has (after a taboo of 15 years or so) begun to talk about it explicitly. It may be this or a wall (hard brexit would demand one).


should we not now try to support a united London? The M25 is not a bad sketch for a wall.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway nice to see the good old EU using

> Gibraltans as bargaining chips - where's the

> outrage EDF or are we inconsistent and

> hypocritical in our hate on this sort of

> disgusting behaviour - moral high ground lost EU

> (not a surprise given their form/integrity though)


hate? disgusting?


now there was I thinking the UK had triggered a divorce that the other party did not want at all. One based on stupidity: xenophobia, a misunderstanding of the nature of trade, an atavistic fear of immigration not to mention the culture of the other. A paradigmatic expression of ressentiment of cosmopolitanism, liberal values, and a modern understanding of the way the economy works.


So yes, I guess your words express ressentiment with some precision.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway nice to see the good old EU using

> Gibraltans as bargaining chips - where's the

> outrage EDF or are we inconsistent and

> hypocritical in our hate on this sort of

> disgusting behaviour - moral high ground lost EU

> (not a surprise given their form/integrity though)


Gibraltar itself itself is not on the table, just the border with Spain, no? And considering Spain has been a law unto itself as far as the Gibraltan border is concerned even whilst Britain has been in the EU, surely this is just business as usual anyway?

To give you the benefit of doubt Loz, I can with a rational hat on, see why the EU might be wise not to take sides in an international dispute over sovereignty.


But don't forget what we're dealing with here - a body that ordered the plunder of People's bank accounts in Cyprus.


Say no more

-----------------------------------

> -----

> > We could also support a united Ireland.

>

> this has now become a mainstream possibility: see

> the reviews in the FT today. Dublin has (after a

> taboo of 15 years or so) begun to talk about it

> explicitly. It may be this or a wall (hard brexit

> would demand one).

>

> should we not now try to support a united London?

> The M25 is not a bad sketch for a wall.


London outer boroughs would be outside of this but we could have an extenstion to Brighton, in the way that East Berlin was connected to West Germany.


The outer Boroughs would be happy - Bromley would be in Kent again, Dagenham in Essex, and Middlesex be more that a postal address.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To give you the benefit of doubt Loz, I can with a rational hat on, see why the EU might be wise no

> to take sides in an international dispute over sovereignty.

>

> But don't forget what we're dealing with here - a body that ordered the plunder of People's bank

> accounts in Cyprus.

>

> Say no more


Well, I certainly didn't that little tangent coming...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am struggling to understand how Green policies translate to local issues? The Southwark Greens leaflet I received reads like a general wish list but is not locally specific. I know the same can be said of other political parties. What specifically are Greens plans for housing, protecting local parks, council tax, transport and roads/ pavement upkeep, CPZ/LTNs?
    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...