Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hmm problematic ... the logic would be that we should stop using condoms or other barrier methods as they tend to be made from rubber/plastic. Which would mean more pesky kids to trip over.


I am sure Mr Anus would agree that this is a bad thing and should be banned. All of it.

An alternative would be to recycle one's condoms. I do. Simply simmer in clean water with a little salt added. Make sure to thoroughly rinse afterwards, however, otherwise the salt condenses into lumps which can be quite painful when rolling over one's John Thomas.

Well lookee here.. I resisted this thread for a while (you know.. it's about bags) but it certainly seems to have come to the boil. I've learned many things.


I have detailed knowledge of Chav's contraception choices. I know I wouldn't want to be trapped in a lift with Dom'anus unless the 'summon help' button was in order. I see 'Foxtons Law' in action (whereby no thread is truly up-and-running until Foxtons has been brought into the equation.


As for the bags, I'd feel like a bit too much of a tit to carry one, but good luck etc.

Macroban the snubbers are on the case of the fox trotters,lets just say they have a surprise in store,by the time we finish with them,they will be paying money into the snub event and buying years supply of energy saving bulbs.You heard it here first.Bob you would never look a tit my love,not a strong silent type like you;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Considering the private revision study that my children undertook, perhaps 15 to 20 years ago in that library it seems a shame they have timed the refurbishment so it won't be open at this crucial time for children. But hey, so long as it's greener... 
    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...