Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The kid was 6....just 6! Bloke in question along

> with 17 family members went on holiday and she

> missed 7 days of schooling. Really! This is all

> ludicrous in my opinion and it's taken away the

> discretion of the Head.


Headteachers still have the discretion to allow absences in term time, if they do it's marked as authorised absence and the local authority isn't involved. All this ruling does is confirm what was already the case, that parents are not allowed to withdraw their children from school without the headteacher's permission.

By my understanding Headteachers can now only grant authorised absences for exceptional circumstances which include close family bereavement and religious holidays. Is that right?


AND


Otta I was talking about you taking your child out of school for 4 days (authorised I'm aware). Had the school denied your request what would you have done?

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By my understanding Headteachers can now only

> grant authorised absences for exceptional circumstances


Yes, since September 2013. (Previously was as in http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/1751/regulation/7/made ).


> which include close family bereavement


There is nothing specified, other than in an LA's code of conduct. I doubt anyone would dream of refusing such leave, and to do so could well be deemed so unreasonable as to be unlawful.


> and religious holidays.


Many could well be exempt, as in s.444(3) of the Education Act 1996:


The child shall not be taken to have failed to attend regularly at the school by reason of his absence from the school?

(a) with leave,

(b) at any time when he was prevented from attending by reason of sickness or any unavoidable cause, or

© on any day exclusively set apart for religious observance by the religious body to which his parent belongs.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/56/part/VI/chapter/II/crossheading/school-attendance-offences-and-education-supervision-orders

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By my understanding Headteachers can now only

> grant authorised absences for exceptional

> circumstances which include close family

> bereavement and religious holidays. Is that

> right?


Yes - family crises also. The chief point of the current guidance is that permission should not be given for holidays if the only reason is because the holiday was cheaper than it would be in the school holidays. Holidays could still be allowed if the the head decides there are special circumstances - for example if a parent was terminally ill and the family were having one last trip before their death.

TT, had they said I couldn't take the kids out for a day for their great gran's 100th, I'd have taken the kids anyway, and paid any fine.



Or actually I might have contested the fine, because a 100th birthday is a genuine one off event, not a holiday that could be taken any time.


But if they'd upheld the fine I'd have paid it and moved on. I wouldn't have gone to court and claimed the state had taken away my rights as a parent, because the state will have had nothing to do with it.

OK and for what it's worth it would most definitely be a contestable case (yours) had they refused.


I'm still very uncomfortable with this Pratt case though and I know you say it's just that he refused to pay the fine but I kinda like that he stood his ground, it can't have been easy being pursued through all the courts in the land over the past 2 years. And it wasn't just a holiday that could have been taken at any time, there were 17 other family members going, all trying to co-ordinate their life schedules, some of them may have only been able to afford to go on the dates that they went. It would be awful to think that the guy and his kids would have had to miss out on such an enriching family experience because a head teacher decided that 7 days off school for a 6 year old was against the rules. Some rules are just meant to be broken!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't that exacrtly what this ruling says?

>

> I am really pleased the guy lost. If you can

> afford flights to Florida and Disney, you can

> afford to just pay the ?60 fine and shut the f**k

> up about it.

>

> That's not to say I don't think you should ever

> take kids out of school, but if there isn't a good

> reason (and Disney isn't a good reason) then you

> shouldn't start screaming about knowing what's

> best for your kids. It's just entitlement for me.


THIS!!

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OK and for what it's worth it would most

> definitely be a contestable case (yours) had they

> refused.

>

> I'm still very uncomfortable with this Pratt case

> though and I know you say it's just that he

> refused to pay the fine but I kinda like that he

> stood his ground, it can't have been easy being

> pursued through all the courts in the land over

> the past 2 years. And it wasn't just a holiday

> that could have been taken at any time, there were

> 17 other family members going, all trying to

> co-ordinate their life schedules, some of them may

> have only been able to afford to go on the dates

> that they went. It would be awful to think that

> the guy and his kids would have had to miss out on

> such an enriching family experience because a head

> teacher decided that 7 days off school for a 6

> year old was against the rules. Some rules are

> just meant to be broken!


It wouldn't have been easy if the guy was anything other than the rampant self-publicist that he so plainly is. I think he has very much enjoyed his moment in the spotlight and certainly been pretty liberal about his tv interviews and the suchlike.


And the Headteacher didn't decide that he couldn't take his child on this 'amazing' holiday, rather they decided that those circumstances weren't exceptional and levied a ?60 fine which matey could easily have paid and still been in pocket from the reduced cost of his holiday.


No one asked him to drag the LEA to a Mags Ct, that was his choice.

Where my daughter works in a college , she asked for a day to attend a funeral of her partner's father, but was refused on the grounds that she only worked part time and term time and was not entitled to a day off. If she went sick she would have been sacked.


My other daughter informed her son's primary school that he was 'sick' so that he could attend his great grandfather's funeral in Sussex as the head was very strict allowing time off even for a family funeral. The Head also had refused some parents to withdraw their child a couple of days before term ceased as their holiday travel plans had changed.


I think along as a child has achieved consistent attendance (95%) parents should be allowed to take a child out of school for 5 days or less for a holiday - especially if it coincides with the last week of term.


When I studied in Holland, the country was divided into 3 regions, each with different start and end days of school holidays. I was informed that if all the schools closed at the same time, it would cause chaos as too many people moving around the country.


A few years ago my friend's secondary school in Bromley did an experimental scheme of having 2 weeks at Whitsun (May half term) and 2 weeks in October (Autumn Half term) with a much shorter Easter and Summer break. Both teachers and parents loved it - parents as they were able to go on holiday at cheaper rates, also split up the need to get weeks of child care. Teacher's loved it as broke the school year up and also assisted with their own family holidays. For some reason, despite the success, Bromley decided that they would not continue with the scheme.

Proposals were made several years ago that the academic year should be split into 4 terms and that GCSEs and A levels be sat in April/May with the results coming out late July/Early August which would give more time for those going onto FE. This I believe would also help parents avoid the expensive holidays costs.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> staggered school holidays are a great idea.


Wouldn't there then be massive complaints from parents with kids in different schools who found they'd have to find three weeks' childcare instead of two? Not to mention the problems for teachers whose children's holidays didn't coincide with theirs. I agree it's a nice idea but it could be problematic.

Spot on Otta


Bit of a delayed response on this as we are away with our kids over the Easter break , and yes we could have saved a lot more than ?60 by taking them in term time.


A couple of years ago we took them out for 3 days to attend a wedding in Krakow. We asked for and were given permission by the head. No problem.

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A couple of years ago we took them out for 3 days

> to attend a wedding in Krakow. We asked for and

> were given permission by the head. No problem.


That's great, but what if they'd said no

i didn't seriously consider that they wouldn't as we have a good relationship with the school, their attendance was near 100% and the legislation and guidelines are clear that sort of trip is generally permitted.




But to play along, we could have not gone, we could have gone without the kids, or we could have made it a very short trip to attend the Saturday service. All doable options.


> DuncanW Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A couple of years ago we took them out for 3

> days

> > to attend a wedding in Krakow. We asked for and

> > were given permission by the head. No problem.

>

> That's great, but what if they'd said no

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> But to play along, we could have not gone, we

> could have gone without the kids, or we could

> have made it a very short trip to attend the

> Saturday service. All doable options.



Or you could have just gone, and paid the fine if they bothered taking it that far (which most probably wouldn't).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...