Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think that's funny I think that's offensive and puerile. It corrupts the innocent fun of children with the bizarre sexual hang ups of poorly adjusted adults.


It's the equivalent of stocking graphic pornography next to the Bash Street Kids.


You could only fail to see this if you were struggling to see beyond your own pretty reflection in the mirror.

Long ago we used to celebrate sculptures of genitals as fertility symbols, then the Victorians decided anything to do with bodily functions was taboo.


I'm not a fan of the Victorians and found the snow sex sculpture quite funny.


Not sure why you are so offended Hugo unless you are upset by the size of his snowy appendage or something :))

to be fair the post before the link was bit of a warning! "sexual" might give it away slightly!

if ur son or daughter searches simple non sexual words on google ur very often end up in porn links! if this was a site for KIDS imight have slight concern but seeing most if not all are adults im not particularly fussed!

some people are obviously too sensative! those people need to lock themselves up in a padded room and wrap them selves in cotton wool for the world is a horrible SEXUALLY infested place! lol

most advertising is sexual! get a grip! crikey! do people like this really exist or am i actually in some sort of wierd dream/ nightmare!


i refer to earlier posts! lol


hahahahahaha

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why sad?

Its sad, that people are now corrupting the poor old snowman.

Most people are very aware of sexuality,but we dont go around shoving it in peoples faces like pubesent school

boys.

Its nothing to do with anal retentive people or any other old Bullshite, people come out with,

Its just plain crass.

Corrupting young children is plain sick.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • we actually need growth. It may be counter intuitive, but we need investment.   my example is about poor financial management, be it personal or central. I'm referring to poor government financial management.
    • This is to conflate household budgets with government budgets. They are very different things  a large part of the anger felt across the country is the decline in public services after a decade and a half of austerity.  You cut more you get more ugly anger  Of course people need to be persuaded to pay more - but that is only realistic path. You cut more you will find out the hard way 
    • The question marks are far poore
    • I think one could argue that degrading public services / infrastructure is what's led to our current, slow economic decline. We've spent 14 years trying austerity, and it's proven counter productive to growth and productivity. A successful economy and society needs good transport, education and early intervention health care. On taxes, it depends how you target them. Tax funded spending may be a positive fiscal multiplier. Taxes on work aren't great, or when they hit the poorest (who tend to spend most of what they earn, boosting economic activity). We need a well designed wealth tax (on idle assets), and stronger measures to target avoidance. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...