Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think that's funny I think that's offensive and puerile. It corrupts the innocent fun of children with the bizarre sexual hang ups of poorly adjusted adults.


It's the equivalent of stocking graphic pornography next to the Bash Street Kids.


You could only fail to see this if you were struggling to see beyond your own pretty reflection in the mirror.

Long ago we used to celebrate sculptures of genitals as fertility symbols, then the Victorians decided anything to do with bodily functions was taboo.


I'm not a fan of the Victorians and found the snow sex sculpture quite funny.


Not sure why you are so offended Hugo unless you are upset by the size of his snowy appendage or something :))

to be fair the post before the link was bit of a warning! "sexual" might give it away slightly!

if ur son or daughter searches simple non sexual words on google ur very often end up in porn links! if this was a site for KIDS imight have slight concern but seeing most if not all are adults im not particularly fussed!

some people are obviously too sensative! those people need to lock themselves up in a padded room and wrap them selves in cotton wool for the world is a horrible SEXUALLY infested place! lol

most advertising is sexual! get a grip! crikey! do people like this really exist or am i actually in some sort of wierd dream/ nightmare!


i refer to earlier posts! lol


hahahahahaha

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why sad?

Its sad, that people are now corrupting the poor old snowman.

Most people are very aware of sexuality,but we dont go around shoving it in peoples faces like pubesent school

boys.

Its nothing to do with anal retentive people or any other old Bullshite, people come out with,

Its just plain crass.

Corrupting young children is plain sick.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This presumably hasn't been done by vandals. It's hardly a Sycamore Gap situation. So if it's been done by professionals, unless it was a mistake (unlikely) there must have been a good reason, as it would have cost money. It would perhaps have been a good idea to put a notice on the tree explaining why such drastic work was done, but usually (I think) it would be either because of disease (often not noticeable on the surface) or that the roots or branches  were endangering nearby structures. As already said, nobody on here is likely to know. The tree department in Southwark Council are helpful in my (admittedly limited) experience. Please post on here when you have found out, as I agree what's left of the tree looks pretty odd. Depending on why the work was done, possibly they intend to remove the rest as well?
    • I have a very stupid question. I want to get a SIM card to put in an old mobile as a back up,  in case despite my best efforts my mobile gets stolen and I have no way of contacting anybody quickly, eg banks. Can I just buy any old cheap pay as you go  SIM card and put say ten pounds on it and it will then be fine for years (with the phone kept charged!) even if I don't use it, or do I have to use the phone  every so often to keep the SIM card valid?
    • I hate to see trees cut down to such an unfinished state. Unless the tree is home to wildlife, an effort should be made to remove & replace. Otherwise, it's just so useless & unsightly.
    • Given the level of care in Dulwich Park, I would not expect this to be careless or unnecessary. It will grow back.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...