Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The DWP estimates there will be at least 507,000 people aged 100 or over by 2066, including 7,700 people aged 110 or over - so-called super-centenarians.


Currently 11,800 people in the UK are aged 100 or over and fewer than 100 are over 110.


The government figures suggest that of the more than 10m who will go on to reach 100, 3m are currently aged under 16, 5.5m are aged between 16 and 50, and 1.3m are aged between 51 and 65.


Full article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12091758

By the time I reach 100, they will probably have found a way to halt the ageing process altogether.


They're already doing experiments with mice.


See for example: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/nov/28/scientists-reverse-ageing-mice-humans


(not a complete cure - but a significant breakthrough)

The 'technical' retirement age is 65 for men, but I quoted the 'real' figures some time ago, which is significantly younger - with a very large proportion not working from 55 onwards.


Whether it's government pensions or private pensions the cash to fund it only comes from the individual.


Even though parents and taxpayers pay for children's upkeep, this expense gets transferred as the child has kids of their own.


Hence the simple way to calculate is to imagine every individual as a self-contained financial unit: during their productive years they must pay for a childhood and a retirement, in addition to their existing living expenses.


It's easy to see that 35 years of income is not going to pay for 25 years of childhood and higher education, alongside 35 years of retirement.


For the next 20 years our generation is additionally going to be paying through the nose until the baby-boomer population crisis smooths itself out.

zeban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Retirement age is 65 now isn't it?


Mine comes up as 68 on the pension advisory site. I'm not looking forward to another 40 years of working and I'm pretty sure the kids I'll be teaching (assuming that's what i'll be doing then) won't appreciate someone their grandparents age trying to teach them.


507,000 people aged 100 is incredible.

It may be possible to live until we are a hundred, but consider a person who is not all that fit and already has many ailments that will not be cured, does that person want to live to a hundred getting worse, and being in need of care by those who does not know that person?

A person living many years after retiring will be using any savings that might have been saved when that has gone belongings or property will have to be sold to keep up the standard that a person enjoyed.

When all of your kin older, and far younger ones have gone, you alone are the last of the line, why would anybody wish to continue?

For my part when my time limit is up whether it hurts or is peaceful does not matter as there will be no memory for me.

Live for today keep fit that will be the natural way to live a long life.

Do not hope that a long life is available to a person who has abused their body and expect a perfect extension of healthy life.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Crikey, £4 plus does seem excessive for one card, let alone twelve at that price! Did he explain why he wanted to spend so much? There could be many reasons. Did the recipients also send expensive cards? If so, rather than putting them in the recycling bin, you could just cut the handwritten bit off and send them to a different relative the following Christmas!
    • Does anyone have one they no longer need? Thanks 
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, North of East dulwich station is not covered by the Dulwich Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) Suburban requirements.  And 1978 was before this guidance was agreed.  Hi Jenijenjen, We have vacant sites and sites that for certain heights would likely become available. Giibs & Dandy vacant builders yard - neighbours I've spoken to of this site are extremely concerned about what the council may now approve. Kwik Fit, Goose Green Trading Estate instantly come to mind as sites where tall buildings would bring a significant offer to the freeholders to see the sites up. The Southwark Plan treats Giibs & Dandy + Kwik Fit as one site suitable for residential redevelopment. It also lists the Trading Estate for this as well. See page.84 https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf Do you think developers having seen the council approve a 9 storey redevelopment are more or less likely now to seek the same at other East Duwlcih locations?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...