EDF Addicts Anonymous

[Otta]

He was ertainly looking as recently as last month. He was funny.

[Seabag]

I could stop, if I really wanted to

Honest, I could, I could, I could

*breaks down, thumps the walls*

[aquarius moon]

.

[Otta]

If someone was that openly hostile to you AqM you'd be upset I reckon.

[Louisa]

What about when someone is that openly hostile to me and I'm expected to be goaded and not reply? Banged to rights me thinks.

I found it funny AqM!

Louisa.

[aquarius moon]

.

[Otta]

What comment was that then?

[Louisa]

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And general issues is any better? the whole

> forum

> > is predictable now. Some of that is to do with

> it

> > being a decade almost of covering topic after

> > topic multiple times. Posters come and go. None

> of

> > us are sacred cows. I would argue none of us

> have

> > ever been that great either, lots of self

> > congratulation going on and dare I say it 'rose

> > tinted' spectacles being worn.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> You're not there, and that's a bonus

>

> Tho the other numpty is, thus mitagating the

> value

>

> Ho hum ...

Taken from a thread a few nights ago bemoaning the demise of the lounge. Foxy goaded without reason (the post was in response to me for goodness sakes).

Louisa.

[????]

Oh is that kind old dear Foxy who laughably threatened me with going to the police for internet hate crime for saying I liked a Seabag post......

[DulwichFox]

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What comment was that then?

Come on Otta. I think you know damn well what comment.

You don't seem to have memory loss regarding something I may of said in some distant thread some time back

when you want to pick me up on something I said later that was perhaps contradictory.

DulwichFox

[aquarius moon]

.

[DulwichFox]

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh is that kind old dear Foxy who laughably

> threatened me with going to the police for

> internet hate crime for saying I liked a Seabag

> post......

Grow up ????. Both your offensive posts were taken down by the Moderators..

Talking about people being dead and a Rotting Fox Carcass in the Canal..

I did not threaten you with going to the Police..

In my PM. I said hate mail on Social Media is a crime and a Police matter.

DulwichFox.

[numbers]

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Taken from a thread a few nights ago bemoaning the

> demise of the lounge. Foxy goaded without reason

> (the post was in response to me for goodness

> sakes).

>

> Louisa.

What's with all the "post was in response to me for goodness sakes" ? Why feign surprise/innocence when there's been plenty of times you've aligned yourself with foxy on this forum as if you're some kind of posting duet.

Admittedly you didn't really do this in the past, you were funnier back then too. Less of a broken record with the same old shtick.

Regular readers will know what I mean.

[aquarius moon]

.

[Louisa]

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Taken from a thread a few nights ago bemoaning

> the

> > demise of the lounge. Foxy goaded without

> reason

> > (the post was in response to me for goodness

> > sakes).

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> What's with all the "post was in response to me

> for goodness sakes" ? Why feign surprise/innocence

> when there's been plenty of times you've aligned

> yourself with foxy on this forum as if you're some

> kind of posting duet.

> Admittedly you didn't really do this in the past,

> you were funnier back then too. Less of a broken

> record with the same old shtick.

> Regular readers will know what I mean.

Just to clarify. Foxy and I are not a "posting duet" - we have never met one another. Just because we agree on certain topics doesn't mean we are in a clique of any kind, and I'm sure foxy will agree with me on this point. I honestly do not mind people not liking me on here or finding my comments boring. But I take offence to anyone suggesting I've made the forum boring, as if I've gone out of my way to do it, that's hurtful. I've never intended to go out of my way to do that. Now how about we all get along again and put a line under all of this? I'll try and wear a clowns hat and blow a whistle to encourage friendly banter. Friends everyone?

Louisa.

[numbers]

FGS I happen to agree with eg. quids on loads of things but don't go around posting how it's us against the rest of you ad nauseum. And that's how it comes across when you both do that. No one cares that you share the same views on certain things, it's the way you go about acting like the persecuted. Yes of course we are all friends looking for banter & interesting things to read here.

Anyway, we've lost a great poster for good today and I'm sad about it.

Long live the lounge & all that.

[Otta]

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> You can't wish people dead just because you don't

> like their forum posts.

>

> Dead is dead. Awful to make jokes about it. The

> person is gone forever. Is that amusing? Think

> before you post.

But you can wish people die in a fire because they go to a bull fight you disagree with?

Loving your logic.

And having looked at your recent posts I am guessing that's where I've upset you. No idea where I've ignored you.

Either way I stand by my posts on that other thread, burning people to death because they disagree with your world view is extremist behaviour, it's not a normal thing to say.

[Louisa]

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway, we've lost a great poster for good today

> and I'm sad about it.

>

Who?

Louisa.

[Louisa]

And numbers how and in what way do I go about acting persecuted? I'm probably one of the least persecuted people, if I was persecuted I would be a shy retiring wall flower and that I most certainly am not. I know a lot of what people say on here is tongue in cheek banter, I do get that.

Louisa.

[DulwichFox]

Otta

AqM's comments were in the context of people

Paying a lot of money to watch innocent animals

Being set light to and then slaughtered after

A terrifying ordeal in a bull ring.

There may be many people who wish the same

Fate to those people. See how they like it?

Foxy

[Otta]

There may be. And in my opinion they would also be misguided.

That doesn't mean I think what they did to the bull was in any way okay.

[red devil]

A better and more rational response would be to say those people need educating, not burned alive...two wrongs etc etc

[numbers]

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And numbers how and in what way do I go about

> acting persecuted? I'm probably one of the least

> persecuted people, if I was persecuted I would be

> a shy retiring wall flower and that I most

> certainly am not. I know a lot of what people say

> on here is tongue in cheek banter, I do get that.

Well Lou, maybe persecuted is not the right word, victimised perhaps?

I think its the way some of your posts come across as if its just you and... din din din ...'The Fox' against the...din din din... 'Rest of the Forum' type thing, thats all. Retiring wall flower, no, I didn't have you down as that :)

[aquarius moon]

My comments are irrelevant now anyway.

Apart from the occasional post in the football threads, I won't be using the forum anymore.

[Alan Medic]

Why is that am?