Jump to content

Recommended Posts

theres shitloads about, depending on how much support / advice you need.The cheapest one may well hit you with extra charges per quarter or for cash returns.


TD waterhouse ( ex Schwab) get a good reputation but also offers ISA and SIPP facilities if you want to manage your pension pot. It isnt for the novice obviously, but not for the Pro either - stops etc are easilty set up on positions.


It is probabaly cheaper to trade covered warrants, ETF or CFDs if you are not bothered about the scrip itself - but you would need to look at IG or another bookie for this side of the business


I may not agree with the machine that is global capital, But I do understand how it works

huncamunca Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> theres shitloads about, depending on how much

> support / advice you need.The cheapest one may

> well hit you with extra charges per quarter or for

> cash returns.

>

> TD waterhouse ( ex Schwab) get a good reputation

> but also offers ISA and SIPP facilities if you

> want to manage your pension pot. It isnt for the

> novice obviously, but not for the Pro either -

> stops etc are easilty set up on positions.


I understood this until this point....


Can you elaborate, ir if you need to elaborate shoudl i steer clear of doing this?!?!?1

Stops are similar to 'buy/sell limits' and are set up in advance. There are different types of stop order. This link may be helpful: Exchange Orders


Do note that most lay people who trade on their own behalf end up losing money.


Edited to say: Oops - on re-reading I think you meant you didn't understand covered warrants, ETF and CFDs? Sorry.

I use Hargreaves Landsdown Vantage account (google it)- no connection with the company etc. Easy to add monies (via debit/credit card) to buy funds and shares and hold them within an ISA or a regular share/fund account. The website is also user friendly.


You get some good discounts off some popular funds by holding them in the vantage account. However, I think their charges for share purchases are probably higher than others (a collegue mentioned Share Centre?? to me).


I guess you have taken a firm view to invest in shares rather than funds...

Halifax online charges 11.95 per transaction according to their website. Marginally cheaper than the bigger high street banks that generally charge 12.50 per trade (ie 25 for in-out round trip)


If it's just share dealing you're after to be honest they're all much-of-a-muchness. I'd find one that makes moving your money in and out easy, charges reasonable fees, and offers ISA/SIPP protection. Job done.



If you want to trade offshore (eg european, asian, Us stocks), get access to the capital markets (bonds), fx markets, or trade warrants/cfd's/etf's/etc's/etn's/structured stuff, this is genearlly where the difference in service becomes more apparent. If you don't know what that is or don't want it, steer well clear.


as always: caveat emptor.


How does your broker compare?

Comparison: Real-time Online UK trades

Interactive Investor ?10.00

Selftrade ?12.50

TD Waterhouse ?12.50

Barclays ?12.95


Very easy to move money in and out. Free of Charge ISAs, SIPPs etc etc. No Inactivty charges.Check the web site

I have been using Barclays Stockbrokers for a few years now, Market Master account plus foreign dealing account, you can't have a foreign dealing account on its own though. Both accounts have inactivity fees on them per quarter if not used. Hope this helps too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...