Jump to content

Recommended Posts

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bit early for me, I'm usually there for about 8

> but I will keep a lookout for the car (and coming

> home too). What a nasty piece of work hitting your

> son and not stopping. Just out of interest, are

> you looking for financial compensation for the

> damage to the bike?


He's a student on a gap year so the money to repair his bike would come in handy although not the main issue, to be honest. He was on his way to work so probably wiped out his pay for the day. He's not complaining about it. That's life. He'll just suck it up. He has learnt that he needs to approach junctions cautiously to avoid potential collisions with careless motorists which has been a useful lesson for him.


Edited to say that I am a car driver myself so that was not an attack on motorists in general.

This has a positive outcome:


"He has learnt that he needs to approach junctions cautiously to avoid potential collisions with careless motorists which has been a useful lesson for him"


Easily forgotten by all (drivers, cyclist and pedestrians)

and i include myself in all of those categories.

Good outlook Pearson. It does annoy me a bit that the onus is on the cyclist to modify their behaviour in order to compensate for bad driving, but he will be safer for it. The driver should also learn not to pull out at a junction without looking though. He obviously didn't care enough to stop when he hit the OP's son, so the actual act of causing an accident and possibly injuring someone clearly wasn't lesson enough, which for any normal person would have been. I think he should financially compensate you for any damage, just for the principle. But we don't live in an ideal world, and I've been in similar situations where I was just glad to have come away unscathed.


The good thing is that your son is ok and he has learned a lesson that will ultimately make him safer.

When my father taught me to drive he told me the concept of "Defensive Driving". It's quite simple - assume that everyone else on the road (car, bike, pedestrian, whatever) is an idiot.


It is really quite effective. And is easily applicable to whatever mode of transport you want.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When my father taught me to drive he told me the

> concept of "Defensive Driving". It's quite simple

> - assume that everyone else on the road (car,

> bike, pedestrian, whatever) is an idiot.

>

> It is really quite effective. And is easily

> applicable to whatever mode of transport you want.



Couldn't agree more. In fact, it's a good policy to apply to virtually any area of life!


Mamma Mia - glad your son is OK, seems to have learnt a valuable lesson, even if it's a shame that it's necessary. Hope you manage to track this driver down and the police have a word and his driving skills improve.

I've been researching cycling courses on his behalf as I think he would benefit from having an instructor to advise him how to approach busy roundabouts and junctions etc in heavy traffic. Not being a cyclist myself I am unable to pass this kind of knowledge onto him. I have found details for the Accompanied Cycling course run by Southwark. Has anyone tried this course? Did you find it useful? Not sure he will agree to it but I'll have a go.
I did the Adult Bikability Training offered by Southwark Council via Cycling Instructor Ltd (not sure if they still do this with all the budget cuts). It was fab and a huge boost to my confidence - we focused entirely on dealing with heavy traffic as that was what made me most nervous. If it's the same thing, definitely worth doing.

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I did the Adult Bikability Training offered by

> Southwark Council via Cycling Instructor Ltd (not

> sure if they still do this with all the budget

> cuts). It was fab and a huge boost to my

> confidence - we focused entirely on dealing with

> heavy traffic as that was what made me most

> nervous. If it's the same thing, definitely worth

> doing.


Was it a two-hour one-to-one course?

Mamma Mia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Was it a two-hour one-to-one course?


Yes - see here http://www.cyclinginstructor.com/cyclinginstructor.nsf/%28$Category1%29/6627A293DE39FDCC802571CD0059876B?OpenDocument


My trainer was Helena.

>I've been researching cycling courses on his behalf as I think he would benefit from having an

>instructor to advise him how to approach busy roundabouts and junctions etc in heavy traffic.


I think what's been said about defensive riding hits the mark. To think what might happen if the road-user you can see acts as if they can't see you or are not going to be considerate to you; or if what you can't see contains a possible hazard. What's happened to him could well be very useful experience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...