Jump to content

Recommended Posts

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bit early for me, I'm usually there for about 8

> but I will keep a lookout for the car (and coming

> home too). What a nasty piece of work hitting your

> son and not stopping. Just out of interest, are

> you looking for financial compensation for the

> damage to the bike?


He's a student on a gap year so the money to repair his bike would come in handy although not the main issue, to be honest. He was on his way to work so probably wiped out his pay for the day. He's not complaining about it. That's life. He'll just suck it up. He has learnt that he needs to approach junctions cautiously to avoid potential collisions with careless motorists which has been a useful lesson for him.


Edited to say that I am a car driver myself so that was not an attack on motorists in general.

This has a positive outcome:


"He has learnt that he needs to approach junctions cautiously to avoid potential collisions with careless motorists which has been a useful lesson for him"


Easily forgotten by all (drivers, cyclist and pedestrians)

and i include myself in all of those categories.

Good outlook Pearson. It does annoy me a bit that the onus is on the cyclist to modify their behaviour in order to compensate for bad driving, but he will be safer for it. The driver should also learn not to pull out at a junction without looking though. He obviously didn't care enough to stop when he hit the OP's son, so the actual act of causing an accident and possibly injuring someone clearly wasn't lesson enough, which for any normal person would have been. I think he should financially compensate you for any damage, just for the principle. But we don't live in an ideal world, and I've been in similar situations where I was just glad to have come away unscathed.


The good thing is that your son is ok and he has learned a lesson that will ultimately make him safer.

When my father taught me to drive he told me the concept of "Defensive Driving". It's quite simple - assume that everyone else on the road (car, bike, pedestrian, whatever) is an idiot.


It is really quite effective. And is easily applicable to whatever mode of transport you want.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When my father taught me to drive he told me the

> concept of "Defensive Driving". It's quite simple

> - assume that everyone else on the road (car,

> bike, pedestrian, whatever) is an idiot.

>

> It is really quite effective. And is easily

> applicable to whatever mode of transport you want.



Couldn't agree more. In fact, it's a good policy to apply to virtually any area of life!


Mamma Mia - glad your son is OK, seems to have learnt a valuable lesson, even if it's a shame that it's necessary. Hope you manage to track this driver down and the police have a word and his driving skills improve.

I've been researching cycling courses on his behalf as I think he would benefit from having an instructor to advise him how to approach busy roundabouts and junctions etc in heavy traffic. Not being a cyclist myself I am unable to pass this kind of knowledge onto him. I have found details for the Accompanied Cycling course run by Southwark. Has anyone tried this course? Did you find it useful? Not sure he will agree to it but I'll have a go.
I did the Adult Bikability Training offered by Southwark Council via Cycling Instructor Ltd (not sure if they still do this with all the budget cuts). It was fab and a huge boost to my confidence - we focused entirely on dealing with heavy traffic as that was what made me most nervous. If it's the same thing, definitely worth doing.

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I did the Adult Bikability Training offered by

> Southwark Council via Cycling Instructor Ltd (not

> sure if they still do this with all the budget

> cuts). It was fab and a huge boost to my

> confidence - we focused entirely on dealing with

> heavy traffic as that was what made me most

> nervous. If it's the same thing, definitely worth

> doing.


Was it a two-hour one-to-one course?

Mamma Mia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Was it a two-hour one-to-one course?


Yes - see here http://www.cyclinginstructor.com/cyclinginstructor.nsf/%28$Category1%29/6627A293DE39FDCC802571CD0059876B?OpenDocument


My trainer was Helena.

>I've been researching cycling courses on his behalf as I think he would benefit from having an

>instructor to advise him how to approach busy roundabouts and junctions etc in heavy traffic.


I think what's been said about defensive riding hits the mark. To think what might happen if the road-user you can see acts as if they can't see you or are not going to be considerate to you; or if what you can't see contains a possible hazard. What's happened to him could well be very useful experience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...