Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Haven't noticed them doing it - is this just recently? The lights are supposed to change in their favour as they approach, from a sensor in the bus lane, maybe it's malfunctioning. Assuage your annoyance by reflecting that if it was working the lights would be turning red against you so you'd have to stop anyway...
Walked by there three times today and it seemed to be working a treat - bus lane light only turning green when a bus was coming, switching to red as soon as the bus passed, didn't seem to be being triggered by bicycles (I regularly cycle down there and I've never noticed it switching for me!). Perhaps it needs some tweaking but from today's observations seemed to be working fine.
On a bike you can easily clock 40 mph with or without a green light at the bottom of the hill, and that's without even pedalling - depending on your bike of course. Buses can do what they want and cars are continually subject to queuing for no reason with engines running. All types of vehicles then brake like crazy (even some bikes) when the lights go red after the bridge. It's a stupid f!!ckin' system for everyone.

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a bike you can easily clock 40 mph with or

> without a green light at the bottom of the hill,

> and that's without even pedalling - depending on

> your bike of course. Buses can do what they want

> and cars are continually subject to queuing for no

> reason with engines running. All types of vehicles

> then brake like crazy (even some bikes) when the

> lights go red after the bridge. It's a stupid

> f!!ckin' system for everyone.


Sorry to be pedantic "cars are subject to queuing for no reason" erm... surely a red light is a red light and is a reason even if it's perhaps not a justified reason.

Keneagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why do buses coming down dog kennel hill in the

> bus lane towards the station and under the bridge

> pull out of the bus lane into the outside lane for

> general traffic if the bus lane traffic lights are

> Red thus reducing even more the flow for general

> traffic under the bridge?


Because they can and it's quicker for them. Not sure what else you're looking for here tbh.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SpringTime Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On a bike you can easily clock 40 mph with or

> > without a green light at the bottom of the

> hill,

> > and that's without even pedalling - depending

> on

> > your bike of course. Buses can do what they

> want

> > and cars are continually subject to queuing for

> no

> > reason with engines running. All types of

> vehicles

> > then brake like crazy (even some bikes) when

> the

> > lights go red after the bridge. It's a stupid

> > f!!ckin' system for everyone.

>

> Sorry to be pedantic "cars are subject to queuing

> for no reason" erm... surely a red light is a red

> light and is a reason even if it's perhaps not a

> justified reason.



That's ok - you're right, not being a pedant :-) Of course they should wait for the red light, it's just that the red light doesn't need to be red.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But all those examples sell a wide variety of things,  and mostly they are well spread out along Lordship Lane. These two shops both sell one very specific thing, albeit in different flavours, and are just across the road from each other. I don't think you can compare the distribution of shops in Roman times to the distribution of shops in Lordship Lane in the twenty first century. Well, you can, but it doesn't feel very appropriate. Haa anybody asked the first shop how they feel? Are they happy about the "healthy competition" ?
    • ED is included in the 17 August closure set (or just possibly 15 August, depending on which part of the page you trust more) listed at https://metro.co.uk/2025/07/25/full-list-25-poundland-stores-confirmed-close-august-23753048/. Here incidentally are some snippets from their annual reports, at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/02495645/filing-history. 2022: " during the period we opened 41 stores and closed 43 loss-making/under-performing stores.  At the period-end we were trading from 821 stores in the UK, IoM and ROI. ... "We renogotiated 82 leases in the year, saving on average 45% versus the prior lease agreement..." 2023: "We also continued to improve our market footprint through sourcing better store locations, opening 53 and closing 51 stores during the year." 2024:  "The ex-Wilco stores acquired in the prior year have formed a core part of this strategy to expand our store network.  We favour quality over quantity and during the period we opened 84 stores and closed 71 loss-making/under-performing ones."
    • Ha! After I posted this, I thought of lots more examples. Screwfix and the hardware store? Mrs Robinson and Jumping Bean? Chemists, plant shops, hairdressers...  the list goes on... it's good to have healthy competition  Ooooh! Two cheese shops
    • You've got a point.  Thinking Leyland and Screwfix too but this felt different.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...