Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't speak for the reliability of it, but screenshots of the account are circulating on social media. Search "twitter suspended terrorist account Manchester".


The Express has also picked up the story...https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/uk/808077/Manchester-terror-bombing-explosion-attack-Ariana-Grande-manchester-arena-ISIS-twitter/amp

Also making social media rounds:


22-05-13 lee rigby

22-03-16 Brussels attack

22-07-16 Munich attack

22-03-17 London attack

22-05-17 Manchester attack

22-07-17 ???

Can you see a pattern??



Are these ALL right? I spot checked a couple.

Weird. Make of it what you will.

There will always be utter bastards like this in the world, but we should remember that not one single terrorist organisation has ever succeeded in its stated aims through the use of violence and murder alone.


Israel is still there, Northern Ireland is still there, capitalism is still flourishing. America got past McVey. For decades people have thought that killing a few innocents would show how seriously they should be taken.


Ultimately, as long as all they do is kill and maim, we will continue to go on with out lives, never giving in to these people. Manchester joins the sad group of places scarred by savage hatred, but it will pick itself up and show the world what it - and the rest of us - think of those who believe this is a path to getting what they want.


And though it's a horrible way to look at it, it says volumes about how they've been curtailed that something like a pop concert is the only type of target they have any realistic chance of attacking.

Concerning social media, a friend of mine posted this elsewhere.


"I was watching as this happened last night and Twitter is becoming as much of a hinderance as a help in situations like these. People talk about fake news like it's dreamt up by media organisations - which it sometimes is - or kids in Macedonian caves, but it's plain as day that a large number of normal users derive some kind of egotistical satisfaction from playing journalist/detective and being first to the "story". The balloon theory came and went, mainly because a security guard at the venue told someone that is what it was. People are still telling parents there are 60 kids holed up in a Holiday Inn, they're not. There was a grid of missing people being shared, most of whom were never missing but their mates had posted their pic almost immediately. The Sun (obviously never a hotbed of accuracy) asked to use a picture purporting to be of dead bodies in the foyer and it wasn't even the same arena. All of which is incredibly shit if you're a parent looking on.


These reports led to inference and speculation on BBC and Sky, who were keen to keep up with the American networks that were ahead of the curve. The American networks were ahead in calling 1) a nail bomb 2) fatalities, because they don't care about due journalistic diligence and went with the if it quacks like duck approach. Anyone could quickly discern what had likely happened when pics of people in torn clothing and with shrapnel wounds started emerging, but there's a difference in confirming it. It's a dangerous precedent and could play into would-be attackers hands."

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> huh?! I suppose that's one thing to be focussing

> your anxiety on.


huh?! That perfectly reasonable set of observations about social media were probably not either tj's only focus or a source of anxiety. It can indeed be extraordinarily heartless and potentially dangerous to relay rumours, which in these cases alas always include false ones.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> robbin Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > huh?! I suppose that's one thing to be

> focussing

> > your anxiety on.

>

> huh?! That perfectly reasonable set of

> observations about social media were probably not

> either tj's only focus or a source of anxiety. It

> can indeed be extraordinarily heartless and

> potentially dangerous to relay rumours, which in

> these cases alas always include false ones.


Yes, thanks, that's basically it.

These are terrible events, and unspeakable for those involved. However, we should be grateful to the security services. This kind of attack is now very rare (far rarer than the IRA attacks when I was younger). We have not had anything like this since 2005. It has become hugely difficult for people to organise this sort of thing (even if this proves to be from a cell from which further atrocities follow).

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saffron Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can you see a pattern??

>

> Erm... no not really!


Erm thanks, Jeremy...though to clarify, it was not a question I myself was asking! It was a quote making social media rounds.


It was just somethig I found interesting/weird, i.e. that someone had found this pattern at all. As robbin notes, there are sadly many other bombings not included.


I could have looked at all these dates for years and never come up with this. People are strange.


Conspiracies abound, no doubt.

There's posts on YouTube (mainly by Americans) within a short no. of hours after the attack claiming the Manchester attack is a hoax - challenging the 'way' people were evacuating the arena (bystanders were just stood there watching, but the poster didn't realise he was showing a clip from Victoria station as people ran there to get trains - so of couse there would be bystanders who were regular customers waiting for their trains wondering what the sudden panicked influx of people wa all about).

There's always someone going to say what happened is not real.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There's always someone going to say what

> happened

> > is not real.

>

>

> A.K.A REALLY sad people with empty lives.


I suspect it's just a coping mechanism of sorts

A lot of it is just misguided tossers, the couple I saw relating to Manchester were prsented as fact with a "but I'll leave you to decide" finale.

Utter BS.

Even if they'd been correct, the 'facts' presented to back-up the assertion simply didn't support it !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...