Jump to content

Recommended Posts

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Clearly the most effective way to reduce spending

> is to eliminate anyone over 65 in a one off budget

> rebalancing cull. Apart from reducing the pensions

> bill, this will solve the housing crisis as well

> as the NHS capacity issues.


Not concerned when you hit 65?

May as well ban families of more than two children, introduce gender screening to ensure there is the correct balance and make entire families live together in a community forever rather than insist the new adults fly the nest at the earliest opportunity *sigh

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Clearly the most effective way to reduce spending

> is to eliminate anyone over 65 in a one off budget

> rebalancing cull. Apart from reducing the pensions

> bill, this will solve the housing crisis as well

> as the NHS capacity issues.


Why stop with eliminating the old? - eliminate the sick, the disabled, the poor & the unemployed & you can have your ideal eugenicist utopia that the gallant Nazi cousins fought for. Then the ?258billion saved would build all the houses that were needed - solution all round. Fixed.

Way back in the 1970s the WRP had a manifesto which included setting up a workers' militia instead of the police, locking everyone up who was a drug addict or alcoholic- because apparently in their 'utopia' people would not need these escapes - some of the members I met were teachers, Vanessa Redgrave and her late brother, Robert Powell popped up at a spring fair fund raiser, and Mungo Jerry (the band) played at the conference.

These ideas do not go away- their adherents are just better than they used to be at hiding them...

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Way back in the 1970s the WRP had a manifesto

> which included setting up a workers' militia

> instead of the police, locking everyone up who was

> a drug addict or alcoholic- because apparently in

> their 'utopia' people would not need these escapes

> - some of the members I met were teachers, Vanessa

> Redgrave and her late brother, Robert Powell

> popped up at a spring fair fund raiser, and Mungo

> Jerry (the band) played at the conference.

> These ideas do not go away- their adherents are

> just better than they used to be at hiding them...


Way back in the 1960s some Tory candidates campaigned with the slogan "If you want a nigger neighbour, vote Labour." These ideas don't go away, and their adherents don't even bother trying to hide them.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Way back in the 1970s the WRP had a manifesto

> > which included setting up a workers' militia

> > instead of the police, locking everyone up who

> was

> > a drug addict or alcoholic- because apparently

> in

> > their 'utopia' people would not need these

> escapes

> > - some of the members I met were teachers,

> Vanessa

> > Redgrave and her late brother, Robert Powell

> > popped up at a spring fair fund raiser, and

> Mungo

> > Jerry (the band) played at the conference.

> > These ideas do not go away- their adherents are

> > just better than they used to be at hiding

> them...

>

> Way back in the 1960s some Tory candidates

> campaigned with the slogan "If you want a nigger

> neighbour, vote Labour." These ideas don't go

> away, and their adherents don't even bother trying

> to hide them.


You just can't resist the urge to scratch that itch you have ,can you? Or is pouring salt in your own wounds?

Green Goose Wrote:


> You just can't resist the urge to scratch that

> itch you have ,can you? Or is pouring salt in your

> own wounds?


Just to save you time and trolling energy, after this message I've decided to ignore your childish attempts at provocation in the same way I'm now deleting your tedious private messages unread - do stop sending them, even you must have better things to do with your life than to harass people who couldn't care less about your opinions via private message. If you ever have anything to say which is actually relevant to discussion, do post it - in public - and I'll be glad to debate. Until then, your drivel will be ignored, both publicly and privately.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Green Goose Wrote:

>

> > You just can't resist the urge to scratch that

> > itch you have ,can you? Or is pouring salt in

> your

> > own wounds?

>

> Just to save you time and trolling energy, after

> this message I've decided to ignore your childish

> attempts at provocation in the same way I'm now

> deleting your tedious private messages unread - do

> stop sending them, even you must have better

> things to do with your life than to harass people

> who couldn't care less about your opinions via

> private message. If you ever have anything to say

> which is actually relevant to discussion, do post

> it - in public - and I'll be glad to debate.

> Until then, your drivel will be ignored, both

> publicly and privately.


You get PMs? I feel strangely jealous! ;-)


*suggests a group hug... ?

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> miga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Clearly the most effective way to reduce

> spending

> > is to eliminate anyone over 65 in a one off

> budget

> > rebalancing cull. Apart from reducing the

> pensions

> > bill, this will solve the housing crisis as

> well

> > as the NHS capacity issues.

>

> Why stop with eliminating the old? - eliminate the

> sick, the disabled, the poor & the unemployed &

> you can have your ideal eugenicist utopia that

> the gallant Nazi cousins fought for. Then the

> ?258billion saved would build all the houses that

> were needed - solution all round. Fixed.


Let's not over reach, one group at a time. We've done the immigrants, let's do the elderly next and see where we end up, yeah?

Winder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One sees the odd house with a poster in the window

> or a bill board in the front yard saying " VOTE

> for ****".

>

> Is this naff or should we all be doing it?


One of the houses on my street has stuck up handwritten anti-Labour messages that they've had their young children write / draw. Things about 'no magic money tree' and 'McDonnell is a Marxist' etc.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and some of them are right up top of your party =

> policy, advisors, McDonnells secret army



Yeah, I know...I know.

V

Honestly? I generally try to be a moderate. I hold strident views on certain things but for the most part I believe in the value of compromise and cooperation, there are times when I recognise my view is not the majority view and I accept that. I live in a democracy and while I'm free to argue my case and complain about the outcome, losing sometimes is part of that. I also don't subscribe to the narrative that the Tory party is evil personified. I disagree with a large parts of what they do, but I also like having free and fair elections and so again, losing is sometimes part of the price I pay for living where I do.


But a strong Labour Party - or any party - has a role to play as effective opposition, without which any government can run amoke. But I'm very nervous about what will emerge the other side of the GE. I simply don't understand some of what Corbyn is doing. I keep thinking that somehow Labour will suddenly coalesce into this coherent and unified party with a sense of purpose and an understanding of the electorate.


And then Dianne Abbott gets on TV again and I'm reminded that however principled and honourable Jeremy Corbym might believe himself to be, he's surrounded by some complete tools.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can’t say I approve but equally staff can vote with their feet. Cabs to collect and deliver - not bad.Maybe Gail’s know something none of us do… Having said that, sure those that are walking in and around Dulwich might prefer cake, hot drinks etc in a venue that is not a pub with the noise from over loud punters… so guess one waits and sees…  Do take some pics or let us know if people are popping in… my guess is yes… 
    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...