Jump to content

Recommended Posts

acumenman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The people who buy the BBC from third parties do

> they need a TVlicence?


Not that I've ever heard. The BBC police are not exactly going to show up at someone's door in Montreal or Washington I don't imagine.


There really is a market for them to sell the licenses to an international client base. Can't think of a reason they don't. Maybe someone else knows?

At the moment the BBC coverage of the situation in Egypt is exemplary.


Unless is of course, if you dont like the views of the protestors being broadcast. At least one BBC news crew have been arrested by the secret police, interestingly just after they had interviewed a pro-Mubarak official.


After being taken away in hoods and handcuffs, there was a flurry of phone calls and they were released.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They sell individual programme broadcast rights to

> channels around the world, hence why iplayer is

> limited to

> It's a very important revenue stream for the beeb.


I'm not sure about the rest of the world, but here the programs they're selling are so old and repetitive that they aren't competing with iplayer. And we honestly don't get anything here that's less than a few years old. The property shows are still talking about the fool-proof/rising property market for Pete's sake. I don't think you could even find them on iplayer.


I think I pay about ?1 a month for our awful BBC Canada channel; would happily pay much more for a licence to access current programs. Or a charge per download fee, you could hold an account and just be charged like pay-per-view. They can make much more revenue this way, I think. Maybe they just haven't kept up with what is otherwise mainstream technology?

acumenman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The people who buy the BBC from third parties do

> they need a TVlicence?


What they buy is access to the third party's internet server in the UK (a UK proxy server IP address).


The cost is not much less than for a UK TV licence.


How legal this is I have no idea. But it certainly seems to be widespread.

We had the BBC international team out here in Singapore before Christmas, and they confirmed they were developing an international edition of the iplayer.


Licensing is a major issue, many programmes are commissioned rather than made by the BBC: QI for example is made by talkback Thames, who also make things like the Apprentice and Escape to the Country for the BBC, whilst they do Britain's Got Talent for ITV.


International rights for programmes are a higher cost than just national ones, so it's difficult to justify this investment when funding is UK only.


They may be able to make money from selling access, but the question will be whether the administration and collection of the proceeds exceeds the additional licensing costs.

Okay that makes sense.


I guess my point though is that people are accessing BBC property without the money going to the BBC, and therefore offsetting the costs of production (admittedly a drop in the bucket but.......)


I'm certain that those using third party servers are not paying anything to the BBC, the server providers are making this money. I have considered going this route but my paranoid husband thinks it will blow up our computer and invalidate our warranty:-$. But I really really miss QI!

This example might not even be relevant but my husband recently watched the ashes via an Australian network, which was fine but being a Brit he felt it wasn't the same. Does it make sense to block access to something others are providing anyway? I'm now in over my head in the discussion as I don't really know how this all works, but again it seems like the BBC could be generating income in places they are not. As I said previously, we would gladly pay the licensing fee and I don't think we're alone on that. The rates for the third party servers are quite high anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...