Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There are some suggestions on Twitter (from reported conversations with a Labour MP), that she may have been diagnosed with a serious, long-term condition. I guess more info will come out, but perhaps we should hold back on the judgement for now.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Diane Abbott is out for an indefinite period.

>

> Sounds pretty permanent to me.

>

> Dulwichfox


I am willing to bet you are wrong. She will be back provided JC survives to the end of June. These two go back a long way - you could even say "joined at the hip".


Care for a tenner on it?

Diane certainly seems pretty vacant. It's difficult to call though as she's not the cleverest at the best of times and her tendency to bulls@*t under pressure just makes her look particularly slow. I think she's just full of it and this is a cynical and somewhat desperate move by Jezza, but I may be proved wrong about her being ill.


Yes rah - good spot - it is the DM link (pretty obvious though!). If you Google her name and 'kicking a blind man's dog' that what comes up. Not sure of your point, although I could imagine you intended some sort of innuendo? It goes without saying the DM would lay it on thick with a trowel - naturally. That said - it appears elsewhere and she sounds pretty damn rude and up herself!

The nastier posters on this thread might like to take a look at the piece linked to below.



https://cookingonabootstrap.com/2017/06/07/we-need-to-talk-about-diane-abbott-now-explicit-content/


Diane Abbott is an intelligent, caring and articulate woman who has been bullied and subjected to vile abuse of the kind shown in that article for years.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The nastier posters on this thread might like to

> take a look at the piece linked to below.

>

>

> https://cookingonabootstrap.com/2017/06/07/we-need

> -to-talk-about-diane-abbott-now-explicit-content/

>

> Diane Abbott is an intelligent, caring and

> articulate woman who has been bullied and

> subjected to vile abuse of the kind shown in that

> article for years.



I presume you felt the same about Thatcher after the Brighton bombing Sue?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> https://cookingonabootstrap.com/2017/06/07/we-need

> -to-talk-about-diane-abbott-now-explicit-content/

>

> Diane Abbott is an intelligent, caring and

> articulate woman who has been bullied and

> subjected to vile abuse of the kind shown in that

> article for years.


Most of that may be true but it is a rather sanitised biography and it omits quite a lot. But it does prove that no matter what background and chances in life, one can progress to to the highest level.


But she does not have a firm grasp of her brief (laziness?) which is why she fails miserably when confronted by a competent interviewer on a one to one basis.


She was fortunate to get dropped into a safe Labour seat by virtue to her close links with Bernie Grant and and others. This also fitted with Labour's desire for more diversity. Then of course there is the JC intimacy.


She is a hypocrit (e.g. private schooling) and an anti-white racist.


Does not have a grasp of economics or even a head for numbers. She parrots idealogical slogans because she does not have the ability to think politically on her feet.


Changes her political views as frequently as she changes her hair style.


Somewhat of a liability.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The nastier posters on this thread might like

> to

> > take a look at the piece linked to below.

> >

> >

> >

> https://cookingonabootstrap.com/2017/06/07/we-need

>

> >

> -to-talk-about-diane-abbott-now-explicit-content/

> >

> > Diane Abbott is an intelligent, caring and

> > articulate woman who has been bullied and

> > subjected to vile abuse of the kind shown in

> that

> > article for years.

>

>

> I presume you felt the same about Thatcher after

> the Brighton bombing Sue?



Eh?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread is really distasteful


Yep, and well done Sue for posting that article. No great fan (of Abbott, not Sue!) for many reasons - hypocrisy over private schooling, unnecessarily inflammatory stances on many issues, excuses for missing challenging votes etc - but there's clearly something now wrong with her either mentally or physically and the clusterfuck bullying has been pretty ugly. I do think Corbyn should have noticed this and sidelined her earlier.


But you know, I'm sure we've all seen or been on the end of bullying in the workplace and know how just one person can reduce another to the edge of a nervous breakdown or beyond, getting daily abuse from thousands, of the vilest nature, like that...can't imagine it.

Is it now the case that people on this forum can just say anything they like about other named individuals as if there were no laws of libel? I have made this point to Admin tonight.


(To be honest, if I do not get a reply to this I will certainly be leaving this forum).

jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it now the case that people on this forum can

> just say anything they like about other named

> individuals as if there were no laws of libel? I

> have made this point to Admin tonight.

>

> (To be honest, if I do not get a reply to this I

> will certainly be leaving this forum).


Are you for real? You think it might be libel to point out someone who speaks out strongly against private education but sends her own children to one of the poshest most expensive private school in the UK?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just catching up on some of this thread. My own view is that the BBC clearly misquoted Trump in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen, and continues to repeat this lie even now. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this a story, more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. Trump used the term "fight" twenty time, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". In my opinion, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to "...fight. We fight like Hell and if you don't fight like Hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. Both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They (we) also face a 1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented act from the supposed 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet is ridiculous'. It is very clear that the Telegraph would love to end the BBC, as would the Times etc. For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him where to go, does show a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
    • The ‘tree people’ conjures up a very Tolkienesque image.
    • I am hoping to find Furniture Risers, 4" or above. Needed to raise a bed and a sofa.  If you have any that you no longer need / wish to sell, please contact me by PM. Thank you  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...